<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/lib/pkp/xml/oai2.xsl" ?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
		http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
	<responseDate>2026-04-25T19:19:22Z</responseDate>
	<request identifier="oai:ojs.jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id:article/70" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmipa/oai</request>
	<GetRecord>
		<record>
			<header>
				<identifier>oai:ojs.jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id:article/70</identifier>
				<datestamp>2025-03-14T07:54:40Z</datestamp>
				<setSpec>jpmipa:ART</setSpec>
			</header>
			<metadata>
<oai_dc:dc
	xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
	http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">How is Augmented Reality Developed in Physics Education? A Review with NVivo from 2019-2024</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Aminudin, Adam Hadiana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Syamsiah, Endah Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nabilah, Fatih Najah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Samsudin, Achmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This review aims to identify developments in Augmented Reality (AR) in physics education from 2019-2024 through NVivo analysis. A total of 19 articles from the Scopus database (SJR 2023: 2 (Q1), 6 (Q2), 4 (Q3), and 7 (Not Applicable)) were used in this review and filtered through the prism guide. The focus of this review includes: 1) The Aim; 2) Methods; 3) Participants; 4) Instruments; 5) Analysis; 6) Concept, and; 7) Software or Device. The results of this review explain that: 1) Based on the objective, the application used is AR (89%); 2) The method used is the development method (47%); 3) Most participants are high school students (42%); 4) The instruments used were questionnaires (37%); 5) N-gain analysis is the most widely used analysis (11%); 6) The physics concept used is electricity (16%), and; 7) The software or device used is 3D Blender (16%) and Unity (16%). Thus, we concluded that the development of AR for physics concepts has become interesting research over the last 5 years (2019-2024). The recommendation from this review is that when developing AR in physics learning, especially abstract ones, you can conduct research using development methods and 3D Blender and Unity software.         Keywords: augmented reality, physics education, NVivo analisis.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp582-600</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">FKIP Universitas Lampung</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2024-09-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmipa/article/view/70</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA; Vol 25, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA; 582-600</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2685-5488</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1411-2531</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmipa/article/view/70/49</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Adam Hadiana Aminudin, Endah Nur Syamsiah, Fatih Najah Nabilah, Achmad Samsudin</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
			</metadata>
		</record>
	</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
