From Behaviorism to Cognitive Neuroscience: An 83-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Mental Arithmetic Research in Educational Psychology (1942–2024)



Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Leiden Levita Sahensolar, Isma Widiaty, Mubiar Agustin

This study addressed the absence of a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of mental arithmetic research in educational psychology by systematically mapping its evolutionary trajectory over 83 years (1942–2024). Using Scopus database searches, 1,749 unique deduplicated records were retrieved, with 626 "arithmetic skills" records serving as the core dataset for descriptive bibliometric analyses of temporal trends, publication characteristics, and theoretical implications. Results revealed exponential growth in publications across five research eras, with the Digital Era (2010–2019) and Contemporary Era (2020–2024) collectively contributing 72.2% of the total output. Journal articles dominated the corpus (85.1%); English-language publications accounted for 93.9% of the dataset; and the low proportion of review articles (4.2%) indicates that knowledge synthesis remains underdeveloped relative to empirical output. Bibliometric patterns reveal a progressive paradigm shift from behaviorist frameworks to cognitive modeling, and then to cognitive-neuroscientific approaches, accelerated by advances in neuroimaging and educational technology. This study provides the first systematic 83-year bibliometric mapping of mental arithmetic research, offering an evidence base to guide future research directions, identify conceptual gaps, and inform mathematics education curriculum and policy, particularly relevant for contexts such as Indonesia, where arithmetic achievement gaps persist.

 

Keywords: bibliometrics, mental arithmetic, educational psychology, mathematical cognition.


Keywords: Pembelajaran Campuran

Amland, T., Grande, G., Scherer, R., Lervåg, A., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2025). Cognitive factors underlying mathematical skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 151(1), 88–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000457

Ammon, U. (2001). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278–291.

Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44(1-2), 75–106.

Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 243–248.

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V., & Van Dooren, W. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 1–8.

Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147(2), 134–168.

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Brown, V. M., Price, R., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2023). Anxiety as a disorder of uncertainty: Implications for understanding maladaptive anxiety, anxious avoidance, and exposure therapy. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 23(3), 844–868.

Campbell, J. I. (1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1(2), 121–164.

Chen, C. Y., Yang, G. Y., Tu, H. X., Weng, X. C., Hu, C., & Geng, H. Y. (2023). Brain active areas associated with a mental arithmetic task: An eLORETA study. Sensors, 23(24), Article 9745.

Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., Henik, A., & Goebel, R. (2007). Notation-dependent and-independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53(2), 307–314.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cui, R., Ding, H., & Zhu, F. (2021). Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(2), 707–726.

Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21.

Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1-2), 1–42.

Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3–6), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000239

Douglas, A. A., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2024). Parental early math support: The role of parental knowledge about early math development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 66, 124–134.

Dowker, A. (2023). The componential nature of arithmetical cognition: Some important questions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1188271.

Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), e2022376118.

Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016). Researchers' individual publication rate has not increased in a century. PLoS One, 11(3), e0149504.

Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243–264.

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 345–362.

Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.

Ginsburg, H. P. (1977). Children's arithmetic: The learning process. New York: Van Nostrand.

Goettfried, E., Thaler, K., Delazer, M., Basso, D., Piazza, M., Knoflach, M., & Zamarian, L. (2025). Arithmetic proficiency across adulthood: Cognitive and subjective influences. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(5), Article 84.

Huber, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H. C. (2014). Adaptive processing of fractions—Evidence from eye-tracking. Acta Psychologica, 148, 37–48.

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impact of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565.

Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.

Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Li, M., & Chen, X. (2024). Improving mental arithmetic ability of primary school students with schema teaching method: An experimental study. PLOS ONE, 19(4), Article e0297013.

Marczewska, M., & Kostrzewski, M. (2020). Sustainable business models: A bibliometric performance analysis. Energies, 13(22), 6062.

McNeil, N. M., Jordan, N. C., Viegut, A. A., & Ansari, D. (2025). What the science of learning teaches us about arithmetic fluency. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 26(1), 10–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006241287726

Myers, K. R., Tham, W. Y., Yin, Y., Cohodes, N., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., ... & Wang, D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 880–883.

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208.

Núñez-Peña, M. I., Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Tubau, E. (2013). Individual differences in arithmetic skill reflected in event-related brain potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 80(2), 143–149.

Prime, H., Andrews, K., Markwell, A., Gonzalez, A., Janus, M., Tricco, A. C., Bennett, T., & Atkinson, L. (2023). Positive parenting and early childhood cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 26(2), 362–400.

Saban, W., Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Borra, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2024). Distinct contributions of the cerebellum and basal ganglia to arithmetic procedures. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(2), Article e1482222023.

Schneider, M., Beeres, K., Coban, L., Merz, S., Susan Schmidt, S., Stricker, J., & De Smedt, B. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), e12372.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

Thorndike, E. L. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. New York: Macmillan.

Van Rinsveld, A., Guillaume, M., Kohnen, S., & Schiltz, C. (2021). Mental arithmetic in the bilingual brain: Language matters. Neuropsychologia, 101, 17-29.

Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2004). Representation of number in animals and humans: A neural model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1493–1504.

Viesel-Nordmeyer, N., & Prado, J. (2023). Arithmetic skills are associated with left fronto-temporal gray matter volume in 536 children and adolescents. npj Science of Learning, 8(1), Article 56.

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.

Zhang, Y., Tolmie, A., & Gordon, R. (2022). The relationship between working memory and arithmetic in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 13(1), Article 22.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.

CSV Scopus
file tambahan

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.