The Influence of the Guided Inquiry Learning Model in Supporting Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
This study systematically examines the implementation of guided inquiry-based learning in chemistry learning. The study covers guided inquiry implementation, applicable chemical materials, measured variables, research media, and gaps. The research was conducted through a systematic literature review by following the PRISMA framework based on identification, screening, feasibility, and inclusion to ensure rigorous and transparent article selection. The selected articles published between 2016 and 2025 were retrieved using the ScienceDirect, Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar databases, resulting in 24 articles. The articles were then analyzed using a thematic synthesis approach, following Braun & Clarke's steps, to answer the research questions. This review aims to provide teachers and researchers in chemistry education with information on the influence and application of the guided inquiry learning model. The review shows that the guided inquiry learning model has been integrated with various learning approaches and models, such as green chemistry, STEM, SETS, scientific, experimental, contextual, simulation, and other learning models. Chemical equilibrium is the most researched material, while reaction rate is still relatively understudied. The most commonly measured aspect was learning outcomes, followed by critical thinking, high-level thinking skills (HOTS), and science process skills. In terms of learning tools, students’ worksheets (LKPD) are the most widely used because they can systematically facilitate guided inquiry. The analysis also shows that research is still dominated by a quantitative approach focused on learning outcomes. At the same time, research that measures cognitive and affective aspects, such as comprehension and self-efficacy, remains limited. The use of other media is still limited. Guided inquiry learning using electronic modules is a promising research opportunity because it can support all stages of inquiry in a structured way and integrate digital features that increase student engagement and help visualize abstract chemistry concepts.
Keywords: guided inquiry learning, chemistry, high school.
Abdukamalovna, A. F. & Bakhtiyar, S. U. (2026). Experimental analysis of the formation of 4k skills in chemistry in students through media education. Sarcouncil Journal of Education and Sociology, 5(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18369682
Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Asaki, I. A. (2023). Factors contributing to teachers' conceptual difficulties in teaching organic chemistry in secondary school. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12433
Afriyuni, S. P., Linda, R., & Erviyenni, E. (2025). The development of e-LKPD uses a CORE-based Liveworksheet application (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, and Extending) on reaction rate material. Chemistry Education Practice, 8(2), 270. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v8i2.9388
Alafnan, M. A. (2025). Enhancing educational outcomes using AlAfnan taxonomy: integrating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3), 2419–2437. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.33147
Alberto, M. C. L., Viviana, B. V. C., Vladimir, B., Enríquez, C., & Fernanda, P. A. P. (2024). Innovative strategies to strengthen teaching-researching skills in chemistry and biology education: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9(July), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363132
Alimova, F. A., & Raimova, N. S. (2025). On practical experience of the festival format: STEAM and development of scientific literacy in extracurricular activities. ISRG Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 201–204.
Andromeda, Iryani, Ellizar, Yerimadesi, & Selvira, W. P. (2019). Effectiveness of chemical equilibrium module based guided inquiry integrated experiments on science process skills high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012152
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2023). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students' higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Boonmoh, A., & Sanmuang, K. (2024). Challenges of ICT teachers in integrating digital literacy post-COVID-19 curriculum revisions in Thailand's English teacher education programs. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(3), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.3p.208
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bremner, N., Sakata, N., & Cameron, L. (2022). The outcomes of learner-centered pedagogy: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 94(May), 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649
Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A. C. W., Wojcikiewicz, S. K., & Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506
Das, M. (2024). Holistic assessment in school education: An in-depth analysis of NEP-2020 and its challenges. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32646
Deepika, G. (2024). The future of education: Trends and innovations in teaching and learning. Global International Research Thoughts, 12(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.36676/girt.v12.i1.110
Dong, M. W. Y. (2023). The importance of implicit knowledge in chemistry teaching and learning. Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, 3(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.53759/5181/jebi202303021
Hanifa, E., Hairida, H., Rasmawan, R., Masriani, M., & Lestari, I. (2024). Readiness of chemistry teachers in implementing the independent curriculum in high school. Educational: Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 956–963. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5913
Iyamuremye, A., Twagilimana, I., & Niyongabo, N. F. (2024). Investigating chemistry teachers' technological, pedagogical, and collaborative skills of using web-based discussion tools in teaching organic chemistry in selected Rwandan secondary schools. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2426451. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2426451
Jafarov, S. (2024). Education, research and globalization. South Florida Journal of Development, 5(10), e4485. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv5n10-012
Kalyani, L. K. (2021). The role of technology in fostering collaboration and digital literacy in education. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. London: Libraries Unlimited.
Kurniawan, E. D. A., Ridho, D., Ardila, M., Pratiwi, A. J., Samosir, R. A., & Siregar, A. D. (2025). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an environmentally friendly chemistry practikum guided based on guided inquiry: The evaluation stage of the ADDIE model. Innovatio: Journal for Religious-Innovation Studies, 25(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.30631/innovatio.v25i1.5971
Leying, F. D. S., Muftih, I., Nurhadi, M., Afdal, M., Suharti, Hasri, & Anwar, M. (2024). Improving students' skills in understanding chemical materials through practicum training at SMAN 3 East Luwu. Journal of Student and Community Service, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1234/mahabakti.v1i1.1550
Minarni, Sulistiyono, & Pandra, V. (2025). Analysis of the needs of chemistry modules based on contextual teaching and learning (CTL) for grade XI students of SMA Negeri 4 Lubuklinggau. JagoMIPA: Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(2), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v5i2.1489
Moju, M., Taylor, L., & Iweuno, B. (2025). Tackling the challenge of chemical representations through sensemaking practices in chemistry education. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00703-3
Moraes, E. B., Kipper, L. M., Kellermann, A. C., Austria, L., Leivas, P., Moraes, J. A. R., & Witczak, M. (2023). Integration of industry 4.0 technologies with education 4.0: advantages for improvements in learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2021-0201
Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking science education practices: Shifting from investigation-centric to comprehensive inquiry-based instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010073
Muhammad, N. Q., & Wati, S. (2025). Independent curriculum: Future-oriented curriculum. Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v6i1.1320
Nababan, Y. S. A., & Dalimunthe, M. (2025). The effect of the guided inquiry model on metacognitive skills and student learning outcomes on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution materials. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 8(4), 5312–5318. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4241
Nguyen, V. H., Halpin, R., & Joy-Thomas, A. R. (2024). Guided inquiry-based learning to enhance student engagement, confidence, and learning. Journal of Dental Education, 88(8), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13531
Novita, F. R. N. A. and D. (2024). Development of E-Lkpd guided inquiry based on liveworksheets to train. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 13(3), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v13n3.p192-198
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: a case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00110a
Page, M. J. McKenzie, J. E. Bossuyt, P. M. Boutron, I. Hoffmann, T. C. Mulrow, C. D. Shamseer, L. Tetzlaff, J. M. Akl, E. A. Brennan, S. E. Chou, R. Glanville, J. Grimshaw, J. M. Hróbjartsson, A. Lalu, M. M. Li, T. Loder, E. W. Mayo-Wilson, E. McDonald, S. McGuinness, L. A. Stewart, L. A. Thomas, J. Tricco, A. C. Welch, V. A. Whiting, P. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pane, E. P., Sauduran, G. N., Simanjuntak, B., Lampola Sitorus P., & Pasaribu, S. (2025). Analysis of students' learning difficulties in understanding chemistry learning materials for Class XI MIA HIGH SCHOOL. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.9.2.458-465
Potier, D. N. (2023). The use of guided inquiry to support student progress and engagement in high school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 1033–1038. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00793
Putra, R. P., Yaqin, M. A., & Saputra, A. (2024). Object of evaluation of learning outcomes of Islamic religious education analysis of bloom taxonomy analysis (cognitive, affective, psychomotor). Global Edu: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v5i1.1590
Qian, Y., Wang, Y., Wen, J., Wu, S., & Zhang, J. (2023). One hundred core concepts in chemistry and upper-secondary school teachers' and students' chemistry conceptual structures. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.493
Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
Reyes, R. L. (2025). Integrating real-world problems into chemistry curricula: Enhancing relevance and student engagement. Forum for Education Studies, 3(2), 2177. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2177
Risna, Hasan, M., & Supriatno. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning oriented to green chemistry to enhance students' higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012095
Rocha, A. C., Steola, A. C., & Kasseboehmer, A. C. (2026). Exploring chemistry: The impact of an interactive chemistry model on student motivation in non-formal education spaces. Journal of Science Communication, 25(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.22323/167120260102161441
Rosero-Cardenas, W. I., Ruiz-Gaona, P. G., Sislema-López, R. N., Tocagon-Cabascango, J. F., & Tituaña-Sánchez, L. G. (2024). The Future of Learning: Preparing Elementary Students for the Digital World. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(4), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n4/133
Said, I., Hamzah, B., Kade, A., Ratman, R., & Ningsih, P. (2021). Student's learning outcomes through the application of guided inquiry learning model based on scientific approach in fundamental chemical laws. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012058
Salo, P., Francisco, S., & Olin Almqvist, A. (2024). Understanding professional learning in and for practice. Professional Development in Education, 50(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2311108
Sanjaya, W. (2006). The Learning Strategy is oriented towards the standards of the educational process. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Saravanakumar, A. R., Raja, G. P., & Sivakumar, P. (2023). Transforming education: Perceptions and challenges of technology-enabled teacher education programmes. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 001–007. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjet.2023.5.2.0077
Sharma, M., Doshi, B. M., Verma, M., & Verma, A. K. (2022). Strategies for developing critical-thinking capabilities. World Journal of English Language, 12(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n3p117
Stieff, M. (2019). Improving learning outcomes in secondary chemistry with visualization-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(7), 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00205
Surendran, D., Arulkumar, V., Aruna, M., Sangamithrai, K., & Thangadurai, N. (2024). Improving the quality of education through data analytics and big data contributions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2742(1), 20001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183570
Talvio, M., Ferreira, M., & Meda, L. (2023). Teachers' conceptions and practices of teaching and learning: Development of four relevant theoretical and empirical dimensions. Brasileira de Educação Journal, 28(April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782023280065
Thayban, T., Kurniawati, E., & Munandar, H. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking skills through STEM-Based guided inquiry on reaction rate. Jambura Journal of Education Chemistry, 7(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v7i2.37428
Thoms, L.-J., Blick, G., Schmidt, L., Furrer, F., Purandare, M., Loch, F., & Huwer, J. (2026). Chemistry teachers' perception of students' difficulties in reading and drawing chemical structures. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(4), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00204
Thoms, L. J., Blick, G., Schmidt, L., Furrer, F., Purandare, M., Loch, F., & Huwer, J. (2026). Chemistry teachers' perception of students' difficulties in reading and drawing chemical structures. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(4), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00204
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Wafiroh, Z., & Budijastuti, W. (2020). The theoretical feasibility of student worksheets based on guided inquiry model of human reproductive system to train critical thinking skills. BioEdu, 9(3), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v9n3.p525-534
Wardani, S., & Anggraeni, A. Y. (2019). The effectiveness of guided inquiry learning based on contextual to improve chemistry literacy ability of senior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022041
Widiya, A. W., & Radia, E. H. (2023). The effect of the guided inquiry learning model on critical thinking skills and social studies learning outcomes. Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 6(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v6i2.477
Widyaningrum, L., & Andromeda, A. (2023). The Influence of the Lesson Study for Learning Community Based Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Basic Chemistry Law Material on the Learning Outcomes of Students of SMA Pertiwi 1 Padang. Jedchem (Journal of Education and Chemistry), 5(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.36378/jedchem.v5i2.3205
Wulan, & Yusmaita, E. (2023). Analysis of chemical understanding and process skills in the independent curriculum phase F acid-base topics for SMA/MA. Journal of Beta Chemistry, 3(2), 37–44. http://ejurnal.undana.ac.id/index.php/jbkHalaman%7C37
Yaayin, B., Archie, P., & Dorsah, P. (2024). Utilising context-based learning to promote students' conceptual understanding and performance in organic chemistry. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 12(6), 28–44. www.idpublications.org
Yanti, W. I., & Suyanta. (2025). The effect of guided inquiry learning integrated with SETS on students' critical thinking ability and self-efficacy in learning buffer solutions. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 2429–2439. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.4.p.2429-2439
Zhong, J., Ismail, L., & Lin, Y. (2025). Investigating EFL students' engagement in project-based speaking activities: from a multi-dimensional perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598513
Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.