Aakre, I. G., & Eggen, P.-O. (2026). University Students’ Preferred Models of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01651

Adewumi, O., Asino, T., Kushimo, O., & Audu, C. (2024). Exploring The Effectiveness of Immersive Mobile Learning in Enhancing STEM Subjects. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 18(2), 49–60. https://www.ijemt.org/index.php/journal/article/view/343

Al Ghawail, E. A., & Ben Yahia, S. (2026). Mobile augmented reality techniques with gamification to enhance learnability for higher institute students of chemistry course. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(1), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2023-0508

Amdayani, S., Dibyantini, R. E., Syafriani, D., & Dalimunthe, M. (2025). Development of STEM-PjBL-Based Teaching Materials to Enhance Students’ Science Literacy on Acid-Base Topic. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(3), 1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1289-1307

Atinaf, W., Belachew, W., Abebe, A., & Melesse, T. (2026). The Effects of Blended Learning on Undergraduate Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding and Molecular Geometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(8), 4350–4363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01880

Badri, A. Al, & Shahat, M. A. (2026). Enhancing High School Students’ Spatial Thinking in Organic Chemistry through Digital Molecular Visualization (KingDrawHD). Journal of Chemical Education, 103(7), 3586–3598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01783

Baeha, N. H., Zahnur, & Oktavia, R. (2025). Learning Media Visualisation of Distance in Augmented Reality-Based Three-Dimensional Space. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 9(1), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v9i1.87270

Bhaskar, R. G., Cook, A., Rotich, F., Arévalo, S., & Popova, M. (2026). Characterizing Student Reasoning with Multiple Representations of Molecular Structure. JACS Au, 6(8), 4776–4792. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.6c00898

Bullock, M., Thoms, L.-J., & Huwer, J. (2026). A Closer Look at How Students Use Augmented Reality to Learn About a Chemical Reaction in the Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(3), 1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01254

Chang, J. (2026). Integrating Augmented Reality in STEM Inquiry: A Focus on Scaffolding for Design Practices. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10367-0

Christopoulos, A., Mystakidis, S., & Perikos, I. (2026). Digital chemistry laboratories: A systematic review of immersive technologies in secondary education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 14, 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103268

Dalimunthe, M., Sugiharti, G., Amdayani, S., & Isa Siregar, M. (2025). The Effectiveness of STEM-Based Electrochemistry E-Modules in Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 14(1), 70–76. https://jpk.fkip.unila.ac.id/v2/article/view/18

Deng, W., Shen, X., Hao, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Designing integrated STEM curriculum to enhance STEM literacy among middle school students: insights from Chinese context. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(5), 1785–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-09962-5

Eikeseth, U., Lykknes, A., Demirdöğen, B., Machková, V., Bílek, M., & Cakmakci, G. (2026). Textbook Representations of Chemical Bonding: Insights from Czechia, Norway, and Turkey. Education Sciences, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16071060

Eticha, A. T., Teju, E., Bedassa, K. B., Deneke, D., Wondimu, S., Ejigu, K., Bekele, T., Takala, C., & Yadesa, W. (2026). Unveiling prevalence, persistence, and sources of fundamental chemical misconceptions among high school students using a four-tier diagnostic instrument. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/D6RP00134C

Fahrunisa, A. H., Nahadi, N., & Fatimah, S. S. (2025). Analysis of Conceptual Readiness in Chemical Bonding Concepts among Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers Using a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Universal Education Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v2i3.79

Fahrunisa, A. H., & Sudrajat, A. (2022). Development of three-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test instruments for measuring students’ misconceptions in chemical bonding. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 11(1), 121–137. https://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JPK/article/download/24246/pdf

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hamerská, L., Koperová, D., & Rusek, M. (2025). Measuring pre-service chemistry teachers’ graph and table interpretation skills: when performance meets confidence. Chemistry Teacher International, 7(4), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2025-0022

Hasdemir, D., Şekercan, B. B., & Seyhan, H. G. (2026). Determining Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Fundamental Chemistry Concept. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2026(5), 1–10. https://izlik.org/JA96ZH57GZ

Hidayat, R., Samsudin, S., Wang, X., & Rahman, S. N. A. (2026). Augmented Reality in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70164

Hitlal, D., Beckles, D., & Thurab-Nkhosi, D. (2026). Virtual Reality in the Caribbean Classroom: Boosting Undergraduate Chemistry Motivation and Performance with 3D Virtual Reality. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(1), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00948

Jeon, Y. E., Ji, J. Y., & Hong, H. G. (2024). Development and Evaluation of a Marker Arrangement-Based Mobile Augmented Reality Application for Learning Covalent and Ionic Bonding in the High School Curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01316

Jiménez, Z. A. (2019). Teaching and Learning Chemistry via Augmented and Immersive Virtual Reality. Technology Integration in Chemistry Education and Research (TICER), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1318.ch003

Jones, O. A. H., Spichkova, M., & Spencer, M. J. S. (2026). Chemistry in 3D: Using Augmented Reality Apps in Chemical Education. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00679

Kamaruldzaman, M. L. H., Osman, K., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2026). Development and validation of an education for sustainable development integrated STEM module. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 20(4), 2176–2186. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v20i4.25273

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Laohapornchaiphan, J., & Chenprakhon, P. (2024). A Review of Research on Learning Activities Addressing the Submicroscopic Level in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(11), 4552–4565. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00156

Loch, F., Huwer, J., & Thoms, L.-J. (2026). Lowering Barriers to Augmented Reality in Chemistry─Easy Creation of Virtual 3D Molecular Models. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00278

Maya, C., & Alférez, M. G. (2026). Molecular Symmetry at Play: An Interactive Game for Undergraduate Chemistry Students Created with Genially. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(7), 3996–4002. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01694

Mellyzar, M. (2021). Analysis of Students Understanding of Chemical Bonds Concept Using Three Tier Multiple Choice. Journal of Educational Chemistry (JEC), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2021.3.1.7560

Mengyao, H., & Ismail, Z. (2025). Designing and developing sustainable development goals problem-based learning strategy to enhance students’ motivation in learning mathematics. Research in Mathematics, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684830.2025.2536897

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508

Mukaromah, K., & Fibriana, F. (2024). Improvement of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills by Guided Inquiry with Augmented Reality-based Solar System Learning Media. International Journal of Science Education and Teaching, 3(3), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijset.2024.8

Nguyen‐Vinh, K., Hoang, M. A., Pham, T. C., & Tran, L. D. (2026). Embedding Rule‐Based Augmented Reality Scaffolding in Experiential Learning Cycles: An SEM Study of Student Engagement in Lab‐Based STEM. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70275

Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Rahayu, S., Asih, E. J. V. T., Ardyansyah, A., & Alam, M. D. (2025). Enhancing High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Acid-Base Chemistry through Augmented Reality Modules. Educación Química, 36(4), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2025.4.90694

Rahmawati, Y., Dianhar, H., & Arifin, F. (2021). Analysing Students’ Spatial Abilities in Chemistry Learning Using 3D Virtual Representation. Education Sciences, 11(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040185

Ramdani, A., Wilujeng, I., Purwoko, A. A., Setiadi, D., Kosim, Yustiqvar, M., & Islamiah, N. (2026). STEM-based inquiry science e-book assisted by augmented reality to improve students’ science literacy. Discover Education, 5(1), 645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01641-4

Ribič, L., & Devetak, I. (2025). Augmented reality in developing students’ understanding of chemistry triplet: a systematic literature review. In Chemistry Teacher International (Vol. 7, Number 1, pp. 157–172). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2024-0060

Sankar, G. (2026). Overcoming Visual–Spatial Challenges in Stereochemistry: Exploring a Structured and Collaborative Approach to Mastering Cyclohexane Conformations in Higher Education Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(1), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01265

Stofiana, T., Sunendar, D., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2026). Educational design models in transition: A comparative review. Journal of Educational Research & Practice, 16, 1–39. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2177&context=jerap

Sudijono, A. (2005). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Thoms, L.-J., Blick, G., Schmidt, L., Furrer, F., Purandare, M., Loch, F., & Huwer, J. (2026). Chemistry Teachers’ Perception of Students’ Difficulties in Reading and Drawing Chemical Structures. Journal of Chemical Education, 103(4), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00204

Ungu, D. A. K., Won, M., Matovu, H., Hernandez-Alvarado, R. B., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Tasker, R., & Tsai, C.-C. (2025). Students’ perceptions of physical magnetic models and immersive virtual reality for chemistry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 47(17), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2574523

Urun Arici, N. (2026). Enhancing the Conceptual Understanding of Pre-Service Science Teachers: Augmented Reality in Online Education for Interparticle Forces. Research in Science Education, 56(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10379-w

Zhang, Y., Feijoo-Garcia, M. A., Gu, Y., Popescu, V., Benes, B., & Magana, A. J. (2024). Virtual and Augmented Reality in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: An Umbrella Review. In Information (Switzerland) (Vol. 15, Number 9). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090515

Zieliński, G., & Gawda, P. (2024). Analysis of the Use of Sample Size and Effect Size Calculations in a Temporomandibular Disorders Randomised Controlled Trial—Short Narrative Review. In Journal of Personalized Medicine (Vol. 14, Number 6). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14060655