Development of a Complex Thinking Test Instrument for Decision Making of Environmental Change Topics
Abstract
The development of test instruments to measure students' decision-making abilities is rarely used in learning. This research aims to develop a complex thinking test instrument for decision-making aspects of environmental change topics. This type of research is research and development (R&D) using a 4-D model modified to 3-D (definition, design, and development) and combined with test instrument development using six stages. Interviews, test instrument validation sheets, and tests were conducted during research data collection. The test instrument developed consisted of 12 descriptive questions and was tested on 363 high school students. Data analysis consisted of content validity, inter-rater reliability, and Rasch analysis. Before the test instrument was tested, it was validated by seven experts. The research results show that the content validity analysis developed is valid because of V-count =0.94 > (V-table =0.76). Interrater reliability analysis obtained a value of 0.806, categorized as good. Item validity (item fit) shows 12 valid questions. The difficulty level of the questions (item measure) shows that three questions are challenging, three are complicated, four are easy, and two are straightforward. Reliability shows an excellent Cronbach's alpha value (0.89), a reasonable person reliability value (0.85), and an excellent item reliability value (0.98). Based on the analysis results, it can be concluded that the questions are declared valid and reliable.
Keywords: development, test instrument, decision making, presseisen taxonomy, rasch analysis.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i4.pp1893-1905
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afrita, M., & Rahmawati, D. 2020. Validitas instrumen tes berpikir tingkat tinggi (hots) pada materi sistem respirasi di kelas XI SMA. Mangifera Edu, 4(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v4i2.83
Akmala, N. F., Suana, W., & Sesunan, F. 2019. Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sma pada materi hukum newton tentang gerak. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.472
Ardhani, Y. 2020. Kualitas butir soal penilaian akhir tahun mata pelajaran teknologi dasar otomotif kelas x teknik kendaraan ringan otomotif di Smk Muhammadiyah Gamping. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 3(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v3i1.34917
Arifin, Z. 2017. Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal Theorems (the Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v2i1.571
Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. 2020. Advances in rasch analyses in the human sciences. advances in rasch analyses in the human sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5
Camila, C. G., Afandi, A., Tenriawaru, A. B., Artika, W., & Siregar, N. 2023. Development of higher order thinking skill questions using Stahl and Murphy’s taxonomy on excretion system topic. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 6(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v6i2.60632
Dietrich, C. 1988. Critical thinking in the college currtculum: somev/here or nov/here? In What Socrates Began: An Examination of the lntellect (Libby G. C, pp. 20–24). the Univenity of Southern Maine Portland, Main. https://digitalcommons. usm.maine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1237&context=facbooks#page=21
Elan, E., Sumardi, S., & Juandi, A. S. 2022. Penyusunan instrumen penelitian tindakan kelas dalam upaya peningkatakan keterampilan sosial. Jurnal Paud Agapedia, 6(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpa.v6i1.51339
Elviana. 2020. Analisis butir soal evaluasi pembelajaran pendidikan agama islam menggunakan program anates. Jurnal MUDARRISUNA, 10(2), 58–74. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/mudarrisuna/article/view/7839
Fatimah, Laela Umi, & Alfath, K. 2019. Analisis kesukaran soal, daya pembeda dan fungsi distraktor. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari
Fikri, A. M. K., Sudarti, S., & Handayani, R. D. 2022. Analisis deskriptif kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (hots) siswa ma unggulan nurul iman pokok bahasan suhu dan kalor dengan menggunakan taksonomi bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12(2), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.581
Harefa, M., Lase, N. K., & Zega, N. A. 2022. Deskripsi minat dan motivasi belajar siswa pada pembelajaran biologi. 1(2), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo. v1i2.65
Hindrasti, N. E. K., Sabekti, A. W., & Sarkity, D. (2021). Pelatihan menyusun soal kemampuan berpikir kritis dan analisis menggunakan model rasch bagi guru ipa. Reswara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.46576/rjpkm.v2i2.1066
Kurniawan, & Andriyani, K. D. K. 2018. Analisis soal pilihan ganda dengan rasch model. Jurnal Statistika, 6(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.26714/jsunimus.6.1.2018.%25p
Magdalena, I., Syariah, E. N., Mahromiyati, M., & Nurkamilah, S. 2021. Analisis instrumen tes sebagai alat evaluasi pada mata pelajaran sbdp siswa kelas ii sdn duri kosambi 06 pagi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 276–287. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/nusantara
Mardapi, D. 2008. Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes. mitra cedikia press.
Marthiani, I. 2024. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.61132/yudistira.v2i2.727
Maulana, AK, & Rochintaniawati, D. (2021). Analysis of decision-making skills of grade XI Students of SMAN 1 Cihaurbeuti. ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal, 2(2), 83–89. DOI:10.4135/9781506307633.n706 Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/yudistira.v2i2.727
Mufidah, S., & Wijaya, A. 2017. Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika realistik pada materi aritmatika sosial untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa smp kelas VII. 6, 11–18. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/download/6970/6695
Nasution, H. fadilah. 2016. Instrumen penelitian dan urgensinya dalam penelitian kuantitatif. Sustainability (Switzerland), 4(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.24952/masharif.v4i1.721
Octaviana, R. I., Anggara, M. B., Jamilah, R., Darmana, A., & Suyanti, R. D. 2022. Analisis item soal kimia SMA menggunakan rasch model. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12248
Perinetti, G. 2018. StaTips Part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr5-17434
Presseisen, B. . 1985. Thinking skills throughout the curriculum: a conceptual design. Research for Better Schools, Inc.
Rahmasari, Y., Noviekayati, I., & Pratitis, N. T. 2023. Self-Determination and conformity with student career decision making , how are they related? International Journal of Social and Management Studies (Ijosmas), 4(6), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v4i6.376
Riyanto, S., & Hatmawan, Aglis, A. 2020. Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang manajemen, teknik, pendidikan dan eksperimen. CV Budi Utama.
Sanjaya, M. S. M., Wahidin, & Maryuningsih, Y. 2019. Penerapan pembelajaran biologi berbasis entrepreneurship pada materi. Jurnal Ilmu Alam Indonesia, 2(1), 21–35. https://syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jia/article/view/6272
Sugiono, Noerdjanah, & Wahyu, A. 2020. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas alat ukur sg posture evaluation. Jurnal Keterapian Fisika, 5(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.37341/jkf.v5i1.167
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. 2015. Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan (issue september). Trim Komunikata Publishing House. http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/14228
Suranata, K., Apriliana, I. P. A., & Ifdil, I. 2020. The effect of problem-solving training to improve student’s critical thinking and decision-making skills: racked analysis. Acta Counseling and Humanities, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46637/ach.v1i1.6
Suratno, S., Kamid, K., & Sinabang, Y. 2020. Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) di tinjau dari motivasi belajar. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan IImu Sosial, 1(2), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.38035/JMPIS
Syahri, andi alim, & Ahyana, N. 2021. Analisis kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi menurut teori anderson dan krathwohl. 1(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i1.16
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, & Others. 1974. Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: a sourcebook. Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Center for Innovation in (Issue Mc). Indiana University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf
Utami, A. C., Khoiri, N., Saefan, J., & Ristanto, S. (2023). Analisis keterampilan pengambilan keputusan pada pemecahan masalah fisika peserta didik kelas X SMA N 1 Mranggen. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran di Sekolah, 4(2), 721-727. https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.176
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.