Analysis of Mathematics Education Students' Reasoning in Determining the Truth Value of Quantification
), Dwi Juniati(2), Siti Khabibah(3), Sumaji Sumaji(4) (1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Surabaya,
(4) Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2025 Uki Suhendar, Dwi Juniati, Siti Khabibah, Sumaji Sumaji
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp657-672
Abstract
Reasoning refers to the structured and logical process of drawing conclusions from given premises. Students of mathematics education, who are being prepared as future educators, are expected to possess strong logical reasoning skills in order to comprehend and convey more advanced mathematical concepts. This study aims to analyze the reasoning abilities of mathematics education students in determining the truth value of quantified statements. The central research question is: How do students' reasoning abilities relate to the accuracy of their problem-solving in the context of quantification? An explorative qualitative approach was employed to explore students' reasoning in evaluating the truth values of quantified statements. The study involved 13 students from the Mathematics Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo who were enrolled in the Mathematical Foundations course during the 2024/2025 academic year. Data collection instruments included a set of test questions and open-ended interview protocols. The analysis focused on indicators of mathematical reasoning, including: (1) identifying facts, patterns, properties, and relationships, (2) drawing logical conclusions, (3) making predictions and solving problems, and (4) constructing systematic and valid arguments. Following the written assessment, three students representing different levels of performance were selected for in-depth interviews. The findings revealed that while all three participants demonstrated potential in mathematical reasoning, each exhibited specific areas requiring further development. Subject N was proficient in deconstructing quantification problems and drawing logical conclusions, although further probing during the interview revealed gaps in deeper conceptual understanding. Subject A displayed semantic comprehension of quantification but lacked precision in applying formal logic and integrating numerical analysis. Subject F demonstrated a verbal understanding of truth value criteria and was capable of drawing conclusions, yet faced challenges with formal notation, particularly with singular quantifiers. Overall, the participants exhibited promising reasoning abilities but required reinforcement in interpreting formal notation, constructing valid arguments, and accurately applying logical structures. Misinterpretations of quantifier symbols and formal argument patterns were identified as common errors.
Keywords: mathematical reasoning, truth valu, quantification.
References
Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129
Barrera, D., Salazar-Torres, J., Vera, M., & Gelvez-Almeida, E. (2019). Problem solving strategy in the teaching and learning processes of quantitative reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1408(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1408/1/012024
Bellucci, F., Moktefi, A., & Pietarinen, A. V. (2018). Introduction: History and philosophy of logical notation. History and Philosophy of Logic, 39(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1372881
Bernard, P., & Dudek-Róycki, K. (2019). Influence of training in inquiry-based methods on in-service science teachers’ reasoning skills. Chemistry Teacher International, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0023
Budiyono, H., Kusmana, A., & Hadiyanto. (2020). Penalaran dan metakognisi kaitannya dengan kemampuan menulis siswa SMA TT-HAS Kabupaten Muaro Jambi. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(2), 16–30.
Corneli, J., Martin, U., Murray-Rust, D., Rino Nesin, G., & Pease, A. (2019). Argumentation theory for mathematical argument. In Argumentation (Vol. 33, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9474-x
Cresswell, C., & Speelman, C. P. (2020). Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A cross-sectional assessment from students to professors. PLoS ONE, 15(7 July), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236153
D’Agostino, M., & Modgil, S. (2018). Classical logic, argument and dialectic. Artificial Intelligence, 262, 15–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.05.003
Dalen, D. van. (1983). Logic and structure. in logic and structure.
DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Ebbinghaus, H. D., Flum, J., & Thomas, W. (1984). Mathematical logic second edition. springer-verlag.
Elsyavira, Rahmi, D., Kurniati, A., & Yuniati, S. (2024). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa kelas x sma. Pedagogy, 9(1), 97–103.
Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, S., & Rahardi, R. (2020). Exploring students’ thinking process in mathematical proof of abstract algebra based on Mason’s framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.689809
Ginting, N., & Hasanuddin. (2020). Penalaran dalam penelitian pendidikan islam. Seminar of Social Sciences Engineering & Humaniora, 271–275.
Hansen, E. K. S. (2022). Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00365-y
Hasanah, S. I., Tafrilyanto, C. F., & Aini, Y. (2019). Mathematical Reasoning: The characteristics of students’ mathematical abilities in problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012057
Huang, H., Cheng, H., Qian, L., Chen, Y., & Zhou, P. (2024). Wh-Words: Existential or universal quantifiers in child mandarin? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 53(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10079-4
Huth, M. R. A., & Ryan, M. D. (2000). Modelling and reasoning about systems.
Lazić, B., Milošević, M., & Sabo, K. (2022). Open-ended tasks as a means of encouraging logical thinking in initial teaching of mathematics. Zbornik Radova Pedagoskog Fakulteta Uzice, 5649(24), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfu2224141l
Matušek, V. (2021). Logical reasoning in life situations and in mathematics. Mathematics in Education, Research and Applications, 7(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.15414/meraa.2021.07.01.58-62
Miseliunaite, B., Kliziene, I., & Cibulskas, G. (2022). Can holistic education solve the world’s problems: a systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159737
Muhammad, S. H., Dewi, R. S., Hayatun, T., Inka, L., Ribka, S., & Marisa, A. (2024). Mengukur dan memahami penalaran teori dan praktik.
Muhtadi, D., Sukirwan, Hermanto, R., Warsito, & Sunendar, A. (2020). How do students promote mathematical argumentation through guide-redirecting warrant construction? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012031
Nieuwland, M. S. (2016). Quantification, prediction, and the online impact of sentence truth-value: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(2), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000173
Nii Laryeafio, M., & Ogbewe, O. C. (2023). Ethical consideration dilemma: systematic review of ethics in qualitative data collection through interviews. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 3(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-09-2022-0014
Peças, P., John, L., Ribeiro, I., Baptista, A. J., Pinto, S. M., Dias, R., Henriques, J., Estrela, M., Pilastri, A., & Cunha, F. (2023). Holistic framework to data-driven sustainability assessment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043562
Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2010). Students’ interpretations of mathematical statements involving quantification. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(3), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219777
Reinmuth, F. (2020). Holistic inferential criteria of adequate formalization. Dialectica, 74(June), 291–325. https://doi.org/10.48106/dial.v74.i2.05
Rudito, M. A. (2009). PYTHAGORAS: jurnal matematika dan pendidikan matematika tingkat-tingkat berpikir mahasiswa dalam universal dari bentuk kalimat biasa menjadi bentuk kalimat formal. 5(1), 13–24.
Tamba, K. P. (2020). Analisis kesalahan pada materi kuantifikasi menggunakan matriks enam sel. Jumlahku, 06(02), 102–115.
Wehmeier, K. F. (2024). On quantification and extensionality. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 17(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020324000066
Wingate, T. G., Bourdage, J. S., & Steel, P. (2024). Evaluating interview criterion‐related validity for distinct constructs A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 33(1), 1–21.
Zendrato, P. S., Kariani Mendrofa, N., Zega, Y., & Telaumbanua, Y. N. (2022). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i2.88
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.