Students’ Mathematical Literacy Ability from van Hiele’s Theory in Geometry
), Sukestiyarno Sukestiyarno(2), Rochmad Rochmad(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v24i1.pp124-134
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Septiana Ulul Azmi, Sukestiyarno Sukestiyarno, Rochmad Rochmad
Mathematical literacy in Indonesia in 2015 saw the results of the Pisa show that it was ranked 62 out of 70 countries by obtaining a score of 386. That the mathematical literacy of Indonesian students is not satisfactory or can be said to be low. The method used in this research is qualitative research. The purpose of this study was to describe students' mathematical abilities in terms of Van Hiele's theory. Data collection techniques include (1) test questions, (2) interviews, and (3) documentation. Data supporting data analysis used includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results obtained were that students with level 3 at Van Hiele were included in the high level category at the junior high school level able to complete 6 indicators of mathematical literacy well, which means students with level 3 Van Hiele then mathematical literacy would be high. Students with level 1 on moderate Van Hiele are only able to complete 4 indicators of mathematical literacy well because students are only able to design strategies but are still lacking in using mathematical tools, while students with level 0 on low Van Hiele are only able to complete 2 indicators of mathematical literacy well because students are less able to design strategies because in the process students are still hesitant in solving a problem.
Keywords: mathematical literacy, van Hiele theory, junior high school students.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i1.pp124-134
Abdussakir .(2010). Pembelajaran geometri sesuai teori van hiele dalam El-Hikmah: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Keagamaan, Vol VII Nomor 2, Januari 2010, ISSN 1693-1499.Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Maliki Malang.
Abidin, Y. (2018). Pembelajaran literasi, strategi meningkatkan kemampuan matematika, sains, membaca dan menulis. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Abidin, Z. Z., & Abu, M. S. (2011). Alleviating geometry levels of thinking among indonesian students using van hiele based interactive visual. Edupress. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11790040.pdf.National Board of Education Standard. (2006). Retrieved 05 Desember 2022 from http://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/kompetensi/Panduan_Umum_KTSP.pdf
Aini, N. R., Suharto, & Yudianto, E. (2018). Analisis berpikir literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika pada pokok bahasan pola bilangan berdasarkan kecerdasan majemuk. Kadikma, 9(2), 127–135. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/9964
Amimah, H. S., & Fitriyani, H. (2017). Level berpikir siswa smp bergaya kognitif refleksif dan impulsive menurut teori van hiele pada materi segitiga. Prosiding seminar nasional Unimus.
Apriyanti, S & Fitriyani, H. (2017). Teori Van Hiele: Tingkat berpikir siswa smp bergaya kognitif refleksif dan impulsif pada materi segiempat. Prosiding seminar nasional Unimus.
Aula, M. F. R., Suyitno, H., & Rosyida, I. (2019). Mathematical literacy ability viewed from student’s learning style based on gender differences on pbl assistance project assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 96–103.
Baiduri, B. (2019). Strategi literasi dalam pembelajaran matematika pada era industri 4.0. Must: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 4(1), 77-94.
Casanova, J. R., Cantoria, C. C. C., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2021). Students’ geometric thinking on triangles: Much improvement is needed. Infinity, 10(2), 217-234.’
Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12, 1-16.
Fitriyani, H., Sri, A. W., & Aan, H. (2018). Students’ geometric thinking based on van hiele’s theory, Volume 7, No. 1, February 2018, ISSN 2460-9285. Journal of Mathematics Educations.
Hardianti, D., Priatna, N., & Priatna, B. A. (2017). Analysis of geometric thinking students’ and process-guided inquiry learning model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012088). IOP Publishing.
Hawari, N. W. (2020). Literature study: improving student's thinking ability in geometry materials with the van hiele theory learning model in the time pandemy covid-19."
Kurniawati, N. D. L., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). Analysis of mathematical literacy skills and mathematics self-efficacy of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012053.
Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students’ in term of gender differences. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 050019.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia pisa result and impact on the reading learning program in indonesia. international conference on interdisciplinary language, literature and education (ICILLE 2018), 373–377.
Nurdianasari, H., Rochmad, & Hartono. (2015). Kemampuan literasi matematika peserta didik kelas viii berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Unnes Jurnal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(2) : 76-83.
Obi, C. N., Agwagah, U. N. V., & Agah, J. J. (2014). Effect of origami on students’ retention in geometry. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 4(5), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.9790/ 7388-04514650.
OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) Result From PISA 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use?. Journal of Mathematics Education.Vol. 4 No.1.Hal. 89-100
Rohman, S. (2019). An analysis of students’ literacy ability in mathematics teaching with realistic mathematics education based on lesson study for learning community. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1265
Sari, R.H.N. & Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1) : 100- 107.
Siew, N., Chong, C., & Abdullah, M. (2013). Facilitating students’ geometric thinking through van hiele’s phase-based learning using tangram. Journal of Social Sciences. 9 (3): 101-111.
Stacey, K. (2012). The international assement of mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Item.University of Melbourne.
Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2016). Assessing mathematical literacy: the pisa experience. Australia: Springer.
Sturgeon, A. (2018). Why literacy should be included in an effective elementary math curriculum. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Educations, 14(2) : 557-560.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Jakarta: Alfabeta
Sukestiyarno, YL. (2013). Statistika dasar. Semarang: UNNES Press
Sukestiyarno, YL. (2020). Olah data penelitian berbantuan spss. Semarang: UNNES Press
Sutisna, A. P., Budi, A. S., & Noornia A. (2019). The influence of the realistic mathematics education approach and early mathematical ability to mathematical literacy Int. J. Multidiscip. Curr. Res. 6 798–801
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Bortoli, L. 2013. A teacher’s guide to PISA mathematical literacy. Australia: ACER Press.
Usman, H., Yew, W. T., & Saleh, S. (2020). Effects of Van Hiele’s Phase-based Teaching Strategy and Gender on Retention of Achievement in Geometry among Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal 134
of Pedagogical Development and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), ep2009. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/9139
Utami, M. W., Setiawan, T. B., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2016). Tingkat berpikir geometri siswa kelas VII-B smp negeri 1 Jember materi segiempat berdasarkan Teori van Hiele ditinjau dari hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Edukasi, 3(2), 43-47.
Van De Walle, J. A. (2008). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah pengembangan pengajaran. Alih bahasa: Suyono. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Van de Walle, J A. (2001). Geometric thinking and geometric concepts. in elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally, 4th ed. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Wardono and S Mariani.(2018). The analysis of mathematics literacy on PMRI learning with media schoology of junior high school students. International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education 2017 (ICMSE2017). J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 983 012107.
Wardono, W., Waluya, B., Kartono, K., Sukestiyarno, S., & Mariani, S. (2015). The realistic scientific humanist learning with character education to improve mathematics literacy based on PISA. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 349-362.
Yulia., Martin, K., & Juli A., (2021). Mathematical literacy: a case study on padang students' mathematical ability. Al Jabar; Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 12, No. 1, 2021, Hal 109 – 120 p-ISSN: 2086-5872, e-ISSN: 2540-7562.
Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Wijaya, A. (2020). Two decades of realistic mathematics education in Indonesia. In International reflections on the Netherlands didactics of mathematics (pp. 325–340). Springer, Cham.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.