Relationship between Formal Reasoning and Understanding of Physics Concepts for Eleventh Grade Students: A Case of SMAN 3 Wajo

Besse Nadifa Zalzabila(1,Mail), Kaharuddin Arafah(2), Mutahharah Hashim(3)

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

Copyright (c) 2025 Besse Nadifa Zalzabila, Kaharuddin Arafah, Mutahharah Hashim
Article Metrics→


Download Full Text: PDF

Abstract

This research is a correlational descriptive study that aims to describe formal reasoning and understanding of physics concepts and the relationship between the two. The population in this study were all students of class XI MIPA SMAN 3 Wajo, while the number of samples based on the Proportional Random Sampling technique was 135 students. The instrument research is in the form of formal reasoning test instruments and understanding of physics concepts. Instrument validation used the Gregori test and continued with empirical validation Data analysis techniques performed consisted of descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis. Based on the descriptive statistical analysis, it was found that the students' formal reasoning and conceptual understanding were in the medium category. Meanwhile, based on inferential statistical analysis, the results of the product-moment correlation test obtained an r count of 0,584. The value of the r count which is positive indicates the relationship between variables is positive. The results of the significance test obtained 0,01<0,05 so it can be said that the relationship between formal reasoning and understanding of physics concepts is significant. So it can be concluded that the relationship between formal reasoning and conceptual understanding is positive and significant.

 

Keywords: physics learning, formal reasoning, conceptual understanding.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i1.pp72-83

References

Acar, Ö., Büber, A., & Tola, Z. (2015). The effect of gender and socio-economic status of students on their physics conceptual knowledge, scientific reasoning, and nature of science understanding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2753–2756.

Arafah, K. (2020). The effect of guided discovery method and learning interest on students’ understanding of physics concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 147–154.

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st-century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1). 82

Benjamin Bloom. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objective : the classification of educational goals. New York: McKay.

Bolat, M., & Sözen, M. (2009). Knowledge levels of prospective science and physics teachers on basic concepts of sound (sample for Samsun city). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1231–1238.

Ding, L. (2014). Verification of causal influences of reasoning skills and epistemology on physics conceptual learning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2).

Effendy, S., & Yuliant, I. (2018). The ability of scientific reasoning and mastery of physics concept of state senior high school students in palembang city. Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 504–509.

Farooq Joubish, M., & Ashraf Khurram, M. (2011). Cognitive development in jean piaget’s work and its implications for teachers. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(8), 1260–1265.

Handoko, A. (2014). Relevant research analysis on improving students’ understanding of mathematical concepts. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 3(2), 25–35.

Hardi, E. K. (2013). Analysis of student physics learning outcomes based on high school formal concrete thinking ability. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(4), 25–35.

Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601–1621.

Jamaa Bok, Y., Ambrose, A., & Maikudi, H. (2022). Formal reasoning: a predictor of academic achievement among chemistry students in secondary schools within kafanchan metropolis. Africans Scholar Journal of Chemistry Innovation & Tech Research (JSITR-9), 3(2), 151–164.

Kartal Taşoğlu, A., & Bakaç, M. (2014). The effect of problem-based learning approach on conceptual understanding in teaching of magnetism topics. Eurasian J. Phys. & Chem. Educ (Vol. 6).

Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57.

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. Ann Arbor, 115–134.

Luo, M., Sun, D., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: Student performance and the interaction effects between grade level, gender, and academic achievement level. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41.

Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skills of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117.

Muslih, M. (2016). Philosophy of science (study of basic assumptions, paradigm and theoretical framework of science). Yogyakarta: LESFI.

Nawi, M. (2012). The effect of learning strategies and formal reasoning skills on mathematics learning outcomes of sma al ulum medan students. Jurnal Tabula Rasa PPS Unimed, 3(2), 81–96.

Riwanto, D., & Azis, A. (2019). Analysis of students' concept understanding in solving physics problems in class X MIA SMA Negeri 3 Soppeng 1. Journal of Science and Physics Education.

Sahin, M. (2010). The impact of problem-based learning on engineering students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of energy and momentum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 519–537.

Salma, V. M. (2015). Development of an e-diagnostic test to identify high school students’ understanding of physics concepts on the subject of static fluids. Universitas Semarang, 4(3), 23–35.

Silaban, B., & Pardede, H. (2021). The correlation between formal reasoning ability and physics concept mastery of senior high school nasrani 1 medan students in 2018/2019 academic year. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(2). Retrieved from www.ijisrt.com745

Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 185–212.

Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7(11).

Soeharto, S., & Csapó, B. (2022). Exploring Indonesian student misconceptions in science concepts. Heliyon, 8(9).

Sriyansyah, S. P., & Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Prospective physics teachers’ consistency and scientific reasoning in the learning of force concept. Wducational and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 21–24.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative research methods, qualitative, and r&d (3rd ed., Vol. 27). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Syihab Ikbal, M., Ali, M., Setianingsih, E., & Alauddin Makassar, U. (2016). Relationship between formal reasoning with physics concepts understanding of class viii students of MTSN Makassar Model. Journal of Physics and Its Applied Education, 4(3), 38–45.

Vachliotis, T., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2021). Developing basic systems thinking skills for deeper understanding of chemistry concepts in high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41.

Wahana, M. (2016). Philosophy of science (1st ed., Vol. 3). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Diamond.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.