Problem-Based Learning versus STAD Leaning Model for Improving Students' Argumentation Skills in Thermochemistry
), I Wayan Dasna(2), Anugerah Ricky Wijaya(3), Istri Setyowati(4)
| 
Country:
(1) Malang State University, Indonesia
(2) Malang State University, Indonesia
(3) Malang State University, Indonesia
(4) SMA Laboratorium Malang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
This study investigates whether the use of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model and Cooperative learning STAD can improve argumentation skills in the thermochemistry chapter. The research sample is 72 grade 11 high school students. The research design was quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest control group design. The results of the study: (1) there was no difference in initial ability between the PBL and CL STAD classes with a significance value of > 0.00; (2) there are differences in argumentation skills between PBL and CL STAD classes with a significance value <0.00; (3) the PBL model N-Gain test was 60.50% in the "quite effective" category and CL STAD was 41.97% in the "less effective" category. Therefore, the PBL model is more effective in improving students' argumentation skills.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i1.pp298-308
Ain, T. N., Wibowo, H. A. C., Rohman, A., & Deta, U. A. (2018). The scientific argumentation profile of physics teacher candidate in Surabaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 997.
Anggraini, V. D., Mukhadis, A., & Muladi. (2013). Problem-based Learning, Motivasi Belajar, Kemampuan Awal, dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(2), 187–195.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach. tenth edition. New York: McGrawHill Education.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. 1980. Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education. Medical Education. New York; Springer.
Barrows, H. (1986). A Taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education. 32(1), 1–20.
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2020) The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 30817(1), 2020.
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., Seng. C. H., & Ibrahim. N. H. (2015). Mastery of scientific argumentation on the concept of neutralization in chemistry: A Malaysian Perspective. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 85-101.
Hastiana, Y., Siroj, R. A., & Irma, I. (2021). Development of electronic magazine teaching materials for key determination and cladograms in ethnobotany and phytochemical studies. Bioeduscience, 5(2), 131–136.
Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16-23.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824,
Kuhn, D., & Moore, W. (2015). Argument as core curriculum. Learning: Research and Practice. Advance online publication, 1(1), 66-78.
Kumala, G. S. R., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Bernalar dan argumentasi melalui problem-based learning. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(02), 14. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.739
Lazarou & Sutherland. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14.
McNeill, K.L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. Behavioral Sciences, 488. doi: 10.4324/9780203810057.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). Model silabus mata pelajaran sekolah menengah atas/madrasah aliyah (sma/ma). Jakarta : Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Okebukola, P. A., & Ogunniyi, M. B. (1984). Cooperative, competitive and individualistic science laboratory interaction patterns effects on students’ achievement and acquisition of practical skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), 875-884.
Pritasari, A. C., Dwiastuti, S., Probosari, R. M., & Sajidan (2015). The argumentation capacity improvement through the problem-based learning implementation in class x mia 1 sma batik 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4 (2), 158-163.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning teori riset dan praktik. Bandung : Nusa Media
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian : kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.