Dynamic Fluid E-Module with STEM Approach to Stimulate HOTS of High School Students in Distance Learning

Agus Suyatna(1,Mail), Viyanti Viyanti(2), Sestika Sestika(3) | CountryCountry:


(1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Integrity:
Similarity:
AI Score:

© 2025 Agus Suyatna, Viyanti Viyanti, Sestika Sestika

Efforts to grow HOTS in high school students are very important to provide for 21st century skills and the demands of the industrial revolution era 4.0. One of these efforts is by providing teaching materials that can stimulate HOTS. This research was aimed to develop a fluid e-module with a valid, effective, and practical STEM approach to stimulate HOTS for high school students. We used the ADDIE R & D model research method which consists of five stages, which are analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The developed e-module product was examined for validity, legibility, effectiveness, and practicality tests. The e-module validity test was conducted by five physics learning experts using a Likert scale questionnaire instrument and analyzed using the percentage technique. The legibility test was conducted by five high school students using a Likert scale questionnaire. The practicality test was carried out in senior high schools in Bandar Lampung using a Likert scale questionnaire. The effectiveness test was carried out using the one-group pretest-posttest design. The effectiveness of the dynamic fluid e-module in stimulating HOTS was determined based on the N-gain value and the difference between the pretest and posttest means. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. The results showed that the developed dynamic fluid e-module with the STEM approach was valid, effective, and practical to stimulate HOTS in distance learning in high school.

 

Keywords: e-module, STEM approach, stimulating HOTS, dynamic fluid.

 

 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v21i2.pp132-145


Annuuru, T. A., Johan, R. C., & Ali, M. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger [Increasing Higher Level Thinking Ability in Natural Science Lessons for Elementary School Students through the Treffinger Learning Model]. Educational Technologia, 1(2). 136–144 Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667-1686.

Bao, L., Fang, K., Cai, T., Wang, J., Yang, L., Cui, L., ... & Luo, Y. (2009). Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison. American Journal of Physics, 77(12), 1118-1123

BSNP. (2010). Pengembangan Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI [Development of the XXI Century National Education Paradigm]. (online). Retrived from http://www.bsnp-indonesia.org/id/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ Laporan-BSNP-2010.pdf on 07 September 2018. Ghaliyah, S., Bakri, F., & Siswoyo, S. (2015, October). Pengembangan modul elektronik berbasis model learning cycle 7E pada pokok bahasan fluida dinamik untuk siswa SMA kelas XI [Development of an electronic module based on the 7E learning cycle model on the subject of dynamic fluids for XI grade high school students]. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (Vol. 4, pp. SNF2015-II). Gonzalez, H.B. & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A Primer. Congressional Research Service. Hake, R. R. (2002, August). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Physics education research conference (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-14). Hannover Research. (2011) Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press. NW, Suite 300, P 202.756.2971 F 866.808.6585]. Washington, DC: U.S.

Howe, C., McWilliams, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance favours the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 67-93 Karanggulimu, L., Sudjito, D. N., & Noviandini, D. (2017). Desain modul praktikum mandiri tentang gerak parabola menggunakan simulasi [Design of independent practicum module about parabolic motion using simulation]. PhET” Projectile Motion”. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional.

Knight, J. K., Wise, S. B., & Southard, K. M. (2013). Understanding clicker discussions: Student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 645-654

Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178-1187 Nurmayanti, F., Bakri, F., & Budi, E. (2015). Pengembangan modul elektronik fisika dengan strategi PDEODE pada pokok bahasan teori kinetik gas untuk siswa kelas XI SMA [Development of Electronic Physics Module with PDEODE Strategy on the Subject of Gas Kinetic Theory for Class XI High School Students]. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains, 2015, 337. Oktaria, D. (2015). Refleksi diri sebagai salah satu metode pembelajaran di Fakultas Kedokteran. Lampung: FK Universitas lampung [Self-reflection as one of the learning methods in the Faculty of Medicine. Lampung: FK, University of Lampung].

Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638.

Risca, A. & Nadi, S. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran guided inquiry berbasis eksperimen terhadap keterampilan berfikir kritis siswa pada materi fluida statis di SMA Negeri 1 Gedangan [The effect of experimental-based guided inquiry learning model on students' critical thinking skills on static fluid material in SMA Negeri 1 Gedangan]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika. 3(2). 167–173.

Saleta, M. E., Tobia, D., & Gil, S. (2005). Experimental study of Bernoulli’s equation with losses. American journal of physics, 73(7), 598-602. Setiadi, R., & Muflika, A. A. (2012). Eksplorasi pemberdayaan courseware simulasi PhET untuk membangun keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA [Explore the empowerment of PhET simulation courseware to build high school students' science process skills]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(2), 258-268. Simon, S., & Richardson, K. (2009). Argumentation in school science: Breaking the tradition of authoritative exposition through a pedagogy that promotes discussion and reasoning. Argumentation, 23(4), 469. Sugianto, D., Abdullah, A. G., Elvyanti, S., & Muladi, Y. (2013). Modul virtual: Multimedia flipbook dasar teknik digital [Virtual module: Multimedia flipbook, basic digital technique]. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 9(2). Suyatna, A., Maulina, H., Rakhmawati, I., & Khasanah, R. A. N. (2018). Electronic versus printed book: A comparison study on the effectivity of senior high school physics book. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 391-398. Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2013, March). Pendidikan STEM dalam entrepreneurial science thinking ‘ESciT’: Satu perkongsian pengalaman dari UKM untuk ACEH [STEM Education in Entrepreneurial Science Thinking 'ESciT': A Collaboration of Experiences from SMEs for ACEH]. In Aceh Development International Conference (pp. 26-28).. Task Force STEM (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Dublin, CA: Californians Dedictaed to Education Foundation.

Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159-170. Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159-170.

Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. doi:10.5703/1288284314636.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.