Students' Understanding of Climate Change after Learning using Immersive Virtual Learning

Asita Al Mufida(1,Mail), Ari Widodo(2), Rini Solihat(3) | CountryCountry:


(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

DOI 10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp642-650
Metrics→
              
Indexing Site→


Download Full Text: PDF

Copyright (c) 2025 Asita Al Mufida, Ari Widodo, Rini Solihat


Immersive Virtual Learning is a learning that is considered meaningful for students to learn the complex concept of climate change because of the many interactions of the systems involved in it, and is considered a concept that is quite challenging for students. It is known that there are still many students who have limited knowledge about climate change so that learning methods are needed that can help them understand the concept of climate change well. This study aims to see how students' understanding after learning using the Immersive Virtual Learning method, and compared with conventional learning methods. Using the Pre-Post Experiment Control Group Design involving 59 students who were divided into treatment and control classes, resulted in data showing that students' understanding in the two classes experienced a significant difference, but very small improvement, even though the treatment class experienced a better improvement. than the control class. Based on this, it can be concluded that students' understanding has increased slightly after learning to use the Immersive Virtual Learning method.

 

Keywords: immersive virtual learning, understanding, climate change.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp642-650


Abdullah, A. H., Soh, H. M., Mokhtar, M., Hamzah, M. H., Ashari, Z. M., Ali, D. F., Samah, N. A., Jumaat, N. F., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., & Rahman, S. N. S. A. (2021). Does the Use of Smart Board Increase Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)? IEEE Access, 9, 1833–1854.

Assan, N. (2015). Gender differentiated climate change discourse in rural communities in developing countries . - ( ISSN : 2322- 2956 , Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences ,... Review article Gender differentiated climate change discourse in. March.

Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107.

Beck, D. (2019). Special Issue: Augmented and Virtual Reality in Education: Immersive Learning Research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 16191625.

Caranto, B. F., & Pitpitunge, A. D. (2015). Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet. Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet, 21–30.

Cheng, K. H. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of exploiting immersive virtual field trips for learning in primary education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–18.

Crop, A., Society, S., Kisauzi, T., Mangheni, M. N., Sseguya, H., Bashaasha, B., & Studies, I. (2012). Evaluation naturelle de l’impact de Beauveria bassiana : Champignon enthomopathogène dans la dynamique de population de Hypothenemus hampei , scolyte de baies des cerises de Coffea canefora. Evaluation Naturelle de l’impact de Beauveria Bassiana : Champignon Enthomopathogène Dans La Dynamique de Population de Hypothenemus Hampei , Scolyte de Baies Des Cerises de Coffea Canefora, 20(2), 443–451.

Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Rousell, D. (2019). Education for what? Shaping the field of climate change education with children and young people as co-researchers. Children’s Geographies, 17(1), 90–104.

De Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2021). Learning in immersed collaborative virtual environments: design and implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–19.

Di, W., Danxia, X., & Chun, L. (2019). The effects of learner factors on higher-order thinking in the smart classroom environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 483–498.

Dimitrov, R. S. (2010). Inside UN Climate Change Negotiations : The Copenhagen Conference. 27(6), 795–821.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

Handayani*, N. A., & Jumadi, J. (2021). Analisis Pembelajaran IPA Secara Daring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 [Analysis of Online Science Learning during the Covid19 Pandemic]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(2), 217–233.

Huang, C. L., Luo, Y. F., Yang, S. C., Lu, C. M., & Chen, A. S. (2020). Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 596–615.

Irawati, T. N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematika pada Materi Bilangan Bulat [Analysis of High-Level Thinking Skills for Junior High School Students in Solving Mathematics Problem Solving Problems on Integer Materials]. Jurnal Gammath, 3(2), 1–7.

Klippel, A., Zhao, J., Oprean, D., Wallgrün, J. O., Stubbs, C., La Femina, P., & Jackson, K. L. (2020). The value of being there: toward a science of immersive virtual field trips. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 753–770.

Kolleck, N. (2016). Uncovering influence through Social Network Analysis: the role of schools in Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 308–329.

Lambert, J. L., Lindgren, J., & Bleicher, R. (2012). Assessing Elementary Science Methods Students’ Understanding About Global Climate Change. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1167–1187.

Markowitz, D. M., Laha, R., Perone, B. P., Pea, R. D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2018). Immersive Virtual Reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(NOV).

McNeal, K. S., Libarkin, J. C., Ledley, T. S., Bardar, E., Haddad, N., Ellins, K., & Dutta, S. (2014). The Role of Research in Online Curriculum Development: The Case of EarthLabs Climate Change and Earth System Modules . Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 560–577.

Meutia, P., Fahreza, F., & Rahman, A. A. (2020). Analisis Dampak Negatif Kecanduan Game Online [Analysis of the Negative Impacts of Online Game Addiction]. Genta Mulia, XI(1), 22–32.

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: a systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812.

Ojala, M. (2016). Facing anxiety in climate change education : From therapeutic practice to hopeful transgressive learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 41–56.

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Learning about history in immersive virtual reality: does immersion facilitate learning? Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1433–1451.

Petersen, G. B., Klingenberg, S., Mayer, R. E., & Makransky, G. (2020). The virtual field trip: Investigating how to optimize immersive virtual learning in climate change education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2098–2114.

Pletz, C., & Zinn, B. (2020). Evaluation of an immersive virtual learning environment for operator training in mechanical and plant engineering using video analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2159–2179.

Rao, D. C. H., & Saha, S. K. (2019). An Immersive Learning Platform for Efficient Biology Learning of Secondary School-Level Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1671–1694.

Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 705–725.

Sachmpazidi, D., Olmstead, A., Thompson, A. N., Henderson, C., & Beach, A. (2021). Team-based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1).

Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2010). Runaway Climate Change as Challenge to the ‘Closing Circle’ of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 37–50.

Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: Fourth edition. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, 11005.

Tan, A. L. (2018). Journey of science teacher education in Singapore: Past, present and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1–16.

Tawfik, A. A., Shepherd, C. E., Gatewood, J., & Gish-Lieberman, J. J. (2021). First and Second Order Barriers to Teaching in K-12 Online Learning. TechTrends, 65(6), 925–938.

Trott, C. D. (2019). Reshaping our world: Collaborating with children for communitybased climate change action. Action Research, 17(1), 42–62.

WIDYANTO, P. (2020). Satya Sastraharing Vol 04 No. 02 Tahun 2020

https://ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/Satya-Sastraharing. Satya Sastraharing, 04(02), 16–35.

Zhao, J., LaFemina, P., Carr, J., Sajjadi, P., Wallgrun, J. O., & Klippel, A. (2020). Learning in the Field: Comparison of Desktop, Immersive Virtual Reality, and Actual Field Trips for Place-Based STEM Education. 893–902.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.