Assessing the Acceptance of Blended Learning Implementation in Universitas Lancang Kuning using the Technology Acceptance Model
), Ambiyar Ambiyar(2), Fadhilah Fadhilah(3), Syahril Syahril(4), Sutejo Sutejo(5), Yogi Ersan Fadrial(6)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
(6) Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v22i2.pp198-205
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2021 Rizki Novendra, Ambiyar Ambiyar, Fadhilah Fadhilah, Syahril Syahril, Sutejo Sutejo, Yogi Ersan Fadrial
The Covid-19 pandemic has forced learning activities to be carried out online. In response to this, Universitas Lancang Kuning, which has implemented the Blended Learning application, wants to measure the level of use and understand the factors that influence the acceptance of the system in an agency. The study was conducted at the Unilak Fasilkom with 92 samples. Data obtained by distributing questionnaires based on indicators and variables of the technology acceptance modelling method. The results of this study indicate that the multiple regression analysis of the variables that have an influence on the real condition of information users is the variable Benefits of using information systems (X1), User Ease of Information Systems (X2), and User Attitudes towards Information Systems (X3) have a significant influence on real condition of information system users (Y). Meanwhile, the behavior of information system users (X4) has no effect.
Keywords: technology acceptance model, blended learning, covid-19 pandemic.
Darma, I. K., Karma, I. G. M., & Santiana, I. M. A. (2020). Blended Learning, Inovasi Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi [Blended Learning, Mathematics Learning Strategy Innovation in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era for Higher Education]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 3, 527–539.
Nerisafitra, P., & Susanto, F. A. (2019). Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mahasiswa dalam Menggunakan Website Pembelajaran dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [Analysis of Factors Affecting Students in Using Learning Websites with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)]. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Educational Technology (JIEET), 03, 97–100. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jieet/article/view/6834
Rahayu, F. S., Budiyanto, D., & Palyama, D. (2017). Analisis Penerimaan E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta) [E-Learning Acceptance Analysis Using the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) (Case Study: Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta)]. Jurnal Terapan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.2017.12.20
Setiawan, T. H., & Aden. (2020). Efektifitas Penerapan Blended Learning Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Akademik Mahasiswa Melalui Jejaring Schoology Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 [The Effectiveness of Applying Blended Learning in an Effort to Improve Students' Academic Ability Through Schoology Networks During the Covid-19 Pandemic]. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif (JPMI), 3(5), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.493-506
Alfian, Ari, N., & Tjahjadi, D. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model pada Sistem Pembelajaran E-Learning. Information Management for Educators and Professionals [Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning Learning Systems], 4(1), 63–72.
Djusar, S., Sadar, M., & Asril, E. (2020). Analisa Kualitas Layanan Sistem Smart Unilak Menggunakan Servqual Method [Analysis of Unilak Smart System Service Quality Using Servqual Method]. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 278–290.
Fiyah, N., Mayangky, N. A., Hadianti, S., & Riana, D. (2019). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model Pada Aplikasi Platform Perdagangan Elektronik Di Kalangan Mahasiswa [Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model on Electronic Trading Platform Applications Among Students]. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 12(1), 59–68.
Hartatik, S. R., & Budihartanti, C. (2020). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap Penerapan Aplikasi Go-Jek Dengan Menggunakan Metode TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) [Analysis of User Satisfaction on the Implementation of the Go-Jek Application Using the TAM Method]. Jurnal PROSISKO, 7(1), 1–7.
Iqbal, J., & -, A. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Modelling (TAM) Untuk Pembelajaran Akuntansi. InFestasi, 14(2), 116.
Irawati, T., Rimawati, E., & Pramesti, N. A. (2020). Penggunaan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Analisis Sistem Informasi Alista (Application Of Logistic And Supply Telkom Akses). 04(2019), 106–120.
Khairudin, K., Rahmi, E., Rahmidani, R., Rusdinal, R., & Gistituati, N. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Penggunaan E-Learning Di Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 97.
Tselios, N., Daskalakis, S., & Papadopoulou, M. (2011). Assessing the acceptance of a blended learning university course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 224–235.
Martín‐García, A. V., Martínez‐Abad, F., & Reyes‐González, D. (2019). TAM and stages of adoption of blended learning in higher education by application of data mining techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2484–2500.
Bachtiar, F. A., Rachmadi, A., & Pradana, F. (2014, February). Acceptance in the deployment of blended learning as a learning resource in information technology and computer science program, Brawijaya university. In 2014 Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Aided System Engineering (APCASE) (pp. 131–135). IEEE.
Nadlifatin, R., Miraja, B., Persada, S., Belgiawan, P., Redi, A. A. N., & Lin, S. C. (2020). The measurement of University students’ intention to use blended learning system through technology acceptance model (TAM) and theory of planned behavior (TPB) at developed and developing regions: Lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(9), 219–230.
Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students’ acceptance of Moodle in a blended learning setting using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3), 300–318.
Tshabalala, M., Ndeya-Ndereya, C., & van der Merwe, T. (2014). Implementing Blended Learning at a Developing University: Obstacles in the Way. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 12(1), 101–110.
Al-Maroof, R., Al-Qaysi, N., Salloum, S. A., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Blended Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Information Systems Models. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–36.
Songsangyos, P., Kankaew, S., & Jongsawat, N. (2016, July). Learners' acceptance toward blended learning. In 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI) (pp. 890–892). IEEE.
Lazar, I. M., Panisoara, G., & Panisoara, I. O. (2020). Digital technology adoption scale in the blended learning context in higher education: Development, validation and testing of a specific tool. PloS one, 15(7), e0235957.
Olivier, J. (2016). Blended learning in a first-year language class: Evaluating the acceptance of an interactive learning environment. Literator (Potchefstroom. Online), 37(2), 1–12.
Wen, M. H., Chen, C. M., & Hsu, I. T. (2016). An integrated BIM and cost estimating blended model–acceptance differences between experts and novice. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 12(5), 1347–1363.
Yeop, M. A., Yaakob, M. F. M., Wong, K. T., Don, Y., & Zain, F. M. (2019). Implementation of ICT policy (Blended Learning Approach): Investigating factors of behavioural intention and use behaviour. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 767–782.
Liu, X. (2021). Primary science curriculum student acceptance of blended learning: structural equation modeling and visual analytics. Journal of Computers in Education, 1–27.
Haron, H., Abbas, W. F., & Abd Rahman, N. A. (2012). The adoption of blended learning among Malaysian academicians. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 175–181.
Lee, L. T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-Learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 1–15.
Alaidarous, K., & Madini, A. A. (2016). Exploring EFL students’ perception in blended learning environment in Saudi technical education context. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(6), 69–81.
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2).
Wong, K. T., Hamzah, M. S. G., Goh, P. S. C., & Yeop, M. A. B. (2016). Blended e-learning acceptance as smart pedagogical tools: An initial study in Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(4), 25–31.
Hidayat, M. L., Prasetiyo, W. H., & Wantoro, J. (2019). Pre-service Student Teachers’ Perception of using Google Classroom in A Blended Course. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 363–368.
Sidek, S. F., Yatim, M. H. M., Ariffin, S. A., & Nurzid, A. (2020). The Acceptance Factors and Effectiveness of MOOC in the Blended Learning of Computer Architecture and Organization Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 909–915.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.