High School Mathematics Teacher’s Ability in Developing Mathematical Literacy Instrument: A Study in East Lampung Regency
), Erimson Siregar(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v21i1.pp35-48
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Mella Triana, Erimson Siregar
High School Mathematics Teacher’s Ability in in Developing Instruments of Mathematical Literacy Test: Study in Lampung Timur Regency. This study aims to describe the ability of high school mathematics teachers in East Lampung Regency in developing instruments of mathematical literacy test. This research is a descriptive study with 19 respondents of high school mathematics teachers. The research data were obtained through test, performance test and questionnaires. Data analyzed using data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The results showed that: a) 63.16% teachers only able to create routine problem which measure employing stage in mathematical process; b) male teachers with more than 25 years teaching experience are only able to develop 5.26% mathematical problems which measure formulating stage; c) Reasoning and argument is the fundamental mathematics skills that was rarely measured in the developed instrument; d) using symbolic, formal and technical language and operations is the most frequently skills that is measured in the developed instrument.
Keywords: mathematical literacy instrument, high school teacher, descriptive research.
Adams, A. E. & Pegg, J. (2012). Teachers‟ enactment of content literacy strategies in secondary science and mathematics classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(2), 151–161.
Afifah, A., Khoiri, M., & Qomaria, N. (2018). Mathematics Preservice Teachers‟ Views on Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(3), 92-94.
Antecol, H., Eren, O., & Ozbeklik, S. (2015). The effect of teacher gender on student achievement in primary school. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1), 63-89.
Botha, H. & Putten, S. (2018). How mathematical literacy teachers facilitate mathematisation in modelling situations. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), 93-102.
Brown, Raymond. (2009). Teaching for social justice: exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy practices of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 171–185.
Budiono, B. (2016). Analisis instrumen asesmen berbasis literasi matematika di SMP [Analysis of mathematical literacy-based assessment instruments in junior high schools]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 542-549. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/ 21691.
Ahmad, D., Suherman, H. M., & Maulana, H. (2018, April). Teacher mathematical literacy: case study of junior high school teachers in Pasaman. In IOP Conference Series: Material Sciences and Engineering (Vol. 335, No. 1, p. 012109). Retrieved April 22, 2020 from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1757-899X/335/1/012109.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen [Law Number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers]. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interactions: Gender of teacher, gender of student, and classroom subject. Sex roles, 45, 579-593.
Eliyanto & Wibowo, U. B. (2013). Pengaruh Jenjang pendidikan, pelatihan dan pengalaman mengajar terhadap profesionaliseme guru SMA Muhammadiyah di Kabupaten Kebumen [Effects of education, training and teaching experience on the professionalism of muhammadiyah high school teachers in kebumen regency]. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1): 34-47.
Juhaevah, F. (2017). Profil kemampuan berpikir reflektif siswa smp dalam mememecahkan masalah matematika standar PISA ditinjau dari perbedaan gender [Profile of reflective thinking skills of junior high school students in solving standard mathematical problems PISA in terms of gender differences]. Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 221-236. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from http://dx.doi.org/10.33477/mp.v5i2.770.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Atas/ Madrasah Aliyah [Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 59 Year 2014 Regarding the 2013 Curriculum of Senior High Schools/Madrasah Aliyah]. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil Ujian Nasional Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!sma! daya_serap!99&99&999!a&03&T&T&1&!1!&.
Keskin, Ö., Çorlu, M. S., & Ayas, A. (2018). Voicing mathematics teachers: A holistic overview of their early career challenges. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 331–371.
Klassen, Robert M.,Chiu, Ming Ming. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756.
Koech, Hellen C., & Mwei, Philip K. (2019). How secondary school mathematics teachers perceive the effectiveness of microteaching and teaching practice in their preservice education. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 7(1), 46-55.
Kyei, L., Apam, B., Nokoe, K. S. (2011). Some gender differences in performance in senior high mathematics examinations in mixed high schools. American Journal Of Social And Management Sciences, 2(4), 348-355.
Lastuti, F. A. O., Maharani, R. M., & Pratini, H. S. (2018, February). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Kelas VIII Menurut Gender. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/etnomatnesia/article/view/2357.
Martin, Andrew., Marsh, Herb. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference?. Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 320–334. Retrieved May 01, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000494410504 900308.
Nizar, H., Putri, R. I. I.; Zulkardi (2018). Developing PISA-Like Mathematics Problem Using the 2018 Asian Games Football and Table Tennis Context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 183-194. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/5246.
Nur, A. S., & Palobo, M. (2018). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari perbedaan gaya kognitif dan gender [Profile of students' mathematical problem solving abilities in terms of differences in cognitive and gender styles]. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(2), 139-148.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 draft mathematics framework. Paris: OECD Publisher.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2013). PISA: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 result in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results combined executive summaries volume I,II & III. PISA: OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from http://educationforatoz.com/images/8.Bobby_Ojose_ Mathematics_Literacy_Are_We_Able_To_Put_The_Mathematics_We_Learn_Into_Everyday_Use.pdf. Podolsky, A., Kini, T. & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of US research. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 4(4), 286-308.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.