Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy: Effects on Students’ Achievement and Attitude towards Physics


(1) Bical High School, Philippines
(2) College of Education, Pampanga State Agricultural University, Philippines


Metrics→ |
Indexing Site→ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Copyright (c) 2025 Ariel Corral Venida, Eivan Mark Sunga Sigua
This study employed a quasi-experimental research using the pretest-posttest design to determine the effect of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy on students‟ achievement and attitude towards physics. A total of fifty-nine grade seven students from two intact heterogeneous classes participated in this study. The engage-explore-explain-elaborate-evaluate (5E‟s) learning cycle was utilized in teaching the control group while the POE strategy was utilized in teaching the experimental group. T-test was used in determining the significant differences between the two groups and within each group in terms of achievement and attitude. The findings of the study showed a significant difference (p = 0.00) in the achievement scores of the two groups in the posttest. It was further revealed that the experimental group (m = 11.47) performed better in the posttest than the control group (m = 8.86), and registered a significant change in attitude towards physics (p = 0.00) from neutral (m = 3.38) to positive (m = 3.76), while the control group maintained a neutral attitude. This suggests that the POE strategy positively influenced the academic performance and attitude of the students towards physics.
Keywords: predict-observe-explain, 5E‟s learning cycle, attitude towards physics, students‟ achievement.
Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students‟ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41.
Adebayo, F. & Olufunke, B. T. (2015). Generative and predict-observe-explain instructional strategies: Towards enhancing basic science practical skills of lower primary school pupils. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 86-92.
Aina, J. K. & Philip, Y. J. (2013). Imperative of environment in science learning. Open Science Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-6.
Akinbobola, A. O. & Afolabi, F. (2010). Constructivist practices through guided discovery approach: The effect on students‟ cognitive achievement in Nigerian senior secondary school physics. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(1),16-25.
Bahtaji, M. A. A. (2016). Predicting students‟ conception in physics using the Eccles et al. expectancy-value model. Proceedings of the De La Salle University Research Congress 4, 2449-3309.
Bajar-Sales, P., Avilla, R. A. & Camacho, V. I. (2015). Predict-explain observe-explain approach: Tool in relating metacognition to achievement in chemistry. Electronic Journal on Science Education, 19(7), 1-21.
Bernardo, A. B. I., Limjap, A. A., Prudente, M. S. & Roleda, L. S. (2008). Students‟ perceptions of science classes in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(3), 285-295.
Bybee, R. W. (2014, April-May). The BSCS instructional model: Personal reflection and contemporary implications. Science & Children, 51(8), 10-13.
Demirbaş, M. & Pektaş, H. M. (2015). Evaluation of experiments conducted about 5 E learning cycle model and determination of the problems encountered. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 51-64.
Gernale, J. P., Arañes, F. Q. & Duad V. (2015). The effects of predict-observe-explain approach on students‟ achievement and attitude towards science. The Normal Lights, 9(2), 1-23.
Guido, R. M. (2013). Attitude and motivation towards learning physics. International Journal of Engineering & Research Technology, 2(11), 2087-2094.
Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Collaborative professional learning through lesson study: Identifying the challenges of inquiry-based teaching. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 118-134.
Haysom, J. & Bowen, N. (2010). Predict, observe, explain: Activities enhancing scientific understanding. Retrieved from http://static.nsta.org.
Hilario, J. S. (2015). The use of predict-observe-explain-explore as a new teaching strategy in general chemistry-laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 37-48.
Joyce, C. (2006). Predict, observe, explain. Retrieved from https://arbs.nzcer.org.nz.
Kala, N., Yaman, F. & Ayas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain technique in probing students‟ understanding about acid-base chemistry: A case for the concepts of pH, pOH and strength. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 555-574.
Khalid, A. & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist vs. traditional: Instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170-177.
Kearney, M., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S. & Zadnik, M. G. (2001). Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported predict-observe-explain tasks to probe understanding. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 589-615.
Kibirige, I. & Hodi, T. (2013). Learners‟ performance in physical sciences using laboratory investigations. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(24), 425-432.
Kibirige, I., Osodo, J. & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on learners‟ misconception about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 300-310.
Mirana, V. P. (2017). Lesson exemplars in electricity and students‟ epistemological beliefs. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(3), 112-117.
Montebon, D. R. T. (2014). K12 science program in the Philippines: Student perception on its implementation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 153-164.
Nurhuda, Lukito, A., & Masriyah (2018). Effectiveness of cooperative learning instructional tools with predict-observe-explain strategy on the topic of cuboid and cube volume. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947, 012052.
Özdemir, H., Bağ, H. & Bilen, K. (2011). Effect of laboratory activities designed based on prediction-observation-explanation strategy on pre-service science teachers‟ understanding of acid-base subject. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science, 169-174.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.