The Effect of e-Worksheets in Eco-Friendly Technology Oriented with Argument Driven Inquiry Model to Improve Students Argumentation Skills
), Devi Andriani(2), Abdurrahman Abdurrahman(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp744-753
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Neni Hasnunidah, Devi Andriani, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman
This study aims to describe the effect of implementing e-worksheets on environmentally friendly technology materials with the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in improving students' argumentation skills. This study involved 60 grade IX students in a junior high school in South Lampung, Lampung province. The research design used was a non equivalent pretest-posttest control group design with an experimental class of 30 students and a control class of 30 students. Students in the experimental class get learning assisted by e worksheet with the ADI model, while students in the control class are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The results showed that students who were taught using the e worksheets with the ADI model had a higher N-gain (g=0.61 with medium criteria) than students taught using the PBL model (g=0.17 with low criteria). Furthermore, the effectiveness of learning environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model shows a high category (ES=0.84). This shows that the e-worksheet material on environmentally friendly technology using the ADI model was effective in improving students' argumentation skills.
Keywords: e-worksheet, argumentation skills, argument-driven inquiry.
Andriani, Y., & Riandi. (2015). Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu di SMP Kelas VII [Improving Students' Concept Mastery through Argument Driven Inquiry Learning in Integrated Science Learning in Class VII for Junior High School]. Edusains, 7(2), 114-120.
Aufschnaiter, V. C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101–131.
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99–108.
Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2012). The effect of argument-driven inquiry on preservice science. Educational Science; Theory and Practice. 15(1), 267-283.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Ginanjar, W.S., Utari, S., & Muslim. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry Dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP [Application of the Argument-Driven Inquiry Model in
Science Learning to Improve Scientific Argumentation Skills for Junior High School Students]. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-37.
Hadiwidodo, S., Taufikurahmah, T., & Tukiran. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kimia Model Argument Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa [Development of Argument Driven Inquiry Model Chemistry Learning Tools to Improve Argumentation Skills and Student Learning Outcomes]. Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 7(1), 1416–1421.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain score. Retrieved 30 March, 2021 from http://www.physics.indiana.edu/nsdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf.
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M. H., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument- Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skill of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Education Research, 3 (9), 1185-1192.
Hazeltine. (2017). Toulmin Argumentation Rubric. Retrieved 2 January , 2022 from https://www.ccusd93.org/cms/lib/AZ02204140/Centricity/Domain/1089/Toulmin %20Rubric.pdf.
Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. Allyn and Bacon. Boston.
Kardono. (2009). Teknologi Ramah Lingkungan Kriteria Verifikasi, dan Arah Pengembangan [Eco-Friendly Technology Verification Criteria, and Development Direction]. Jakarta: Lokakarya (BPPT, Jakarta).
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2005). The Features of Peer Argumentation in Middle School Students’ Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211-213.
Lismawati., Hasnunidah, N., & Abdurrahman. (2021). Design and Validation of Science Student Worksheet Based on Argument Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentation Skills for Junior High School Students. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 250-258.
Marhamah, O.S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang [Application of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Improving Students' Argumentation Ability on the Concept of Environmental Pollution in
Class X for Senior High School 1 Ciawigebang]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 9(2): 39–45.
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of argumentation skills in science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457–461.
Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., & Indrowati, M. (2016). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan [Profile of Scientific Argumentation Skills for Biology Education FKIP UNS Students in Plant Anatomy Course]. Bioedukasi, 9(1), 29–33.
Retno, R. S., & Yuhanna, W. L. (2018). Implementasi green living berbasis scientific inquiry pada pembelajaran IPA terhadap kinerja ilmiah mahasiswa [Implementation of green living based on scientific inquiry in science learning on student scientific performance]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 31–40.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257.
Santa., Noerida., Widjajanto, E.T., & Dyah, L. A. (2017). Modul Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Teknologi Ramah Lingkungan, Listrik, dan Magnet [Sustainable Professional Development Module Natural Science Subjects Environmentally Friendly Technology, Electricity, and Magnetism]. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad city mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5–29.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D [Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Watson, J. R., Swain, J. R. L., & Mcrobbie, C. (2007).Students’ discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Research Report, 26(1), 37-41.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering Students ’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.