The Development of Test Instrument on The Excretion System to Measure Creative Thinking Skills
), Lukman Nulhakim(2), Dwi Indah Suryani(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v22i1.pp10-23
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Ummu Maghfiroh, Lukman Nulhakim, Dwi Indah Suryani
The creative thinking ability test instrument is a form tool to measure student creative thinking skills. This study aims to develop a creative thinking ability test instrument and determine is validity level. The research method used in developing the test instrument is the Borg and Gall development method (1983). The research instrument used in this study was a validation sheet. The results of this study indicate that the research and development process carried out by the researchers is a potential problem, data collection, planning, product design development, design validation, and design revision. The validity level of the creative thinking ability test instrument on the concept of the human excretion system that the researcher developed was in the valid category with a value of 76.94%. The test instrument for the ability to think creatively on the concept of the human excretion system is valid for use in student trials.
Keywords: Test instrument, creative thinking, excretion system
Anwar, M. N., Aness, M., Khizar, A., Naseer, M., & Muhammad, G. (2012). Relationship of creative thinking with the academic achievements of secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3), 44-47.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An introduction. 4th Ed. New York: Longman, Inc.
Elaine, B. J. (2014) Contextual Teaching & Learning. Bandung: Kaifa.
Florida, R., Charlotta M., & Karen K. (2015). The Global Creativity Index. Rotman: The Martin Prosperity Institute.
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno. (2014). Development of high physical thinking skills (PysTHOTS) development students in high school. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1-12.
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Kerangka Dasar Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity test?: A Review of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3-14.
Kiryak, Z., & Çalik, M. (2017). Improving grade 7 students’ conceptual understanding of water pollution via common knowledge construction model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1-22.
Kusumaningrum, S., & Djukri, D. (2016). Development of project based learning (PjBL) learning tools to improve skills in the process of science and creativity. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 241-251.
Mardapi, D., Kumaidi. & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala baru. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 15(2): 326-341.
Mardapi, D. (2018). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non tes. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Munandar, U. (2016). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Murfiah, U. (2017). Pembelajaran Terpadu (Teori & Praktik Terbaik di Sekolah). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Nuswowati, M. et al. (2017). Implementation of problem-based learning with green chemistry vision to improve creative thinking skill and students’ creative actions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 221-228.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2016. Jakarta: Mendikbud.
Perry, A., & Karpova, E. (2017). Efficacy of teaching creative thinking skills: A comparison of multiple creativity assessments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 1-25.
Purwanto, M. N. (2013). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya.
Putranta, H. and Supahar. (2019). Development of Physics-Tier Test (PysTT) to measure students’ conceptual understanding and creative thinking skill: A qualitative synthesis. Journal For The Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 747-775.
Rabanos, N. L and Torres, P. A. (2012). Effects of a program for developing creative thinking skills. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(3), 1139-1158.
Redhana, I W. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 48(1-3), 27-34.
Riduwan. (2012). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Turkmen, H. and Sertkahya, M. (2015). Creative thinking skills analyzes of vocational high school students. Journal of Education and Instructional Students in The World, 5(10), 74-84.
Van den Berg, G. (2008). The use of assessment in the development of higher-order thinking skills. Africa Education Review, 1(2), 279-294.
Verlinden, J. (2005). Critical Thinking and Everyday Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning, Inc.
Williams, F. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.