Items Analysis of Midterm Exam Test on Difficulty Level and Discrimination Index Based on Bloom Taxonomy: A Case of Junior High School Mathematics Problems
), Mamik Suhendarti(2), Hawa Liberna(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp486-495
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Nur Kholifah, Mamik Suhendarti, Hawa Liberna
The purpose of this study was to find out how the level of difficulty on the Middle Semester Assessment of Mathematics class VII SMP Negeri 5 Cibitung for the 2021/2022 academic year was based on Bloom's taxonomy. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 5 Cibitung. The type of research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The data collection technique used is the documentation method, while the data analysis technique uses Microsoft Excel with formulas to test validity, reliability, difficulty level, discriminatory power, and calculate the percentage level of difficulty of questions based on Bloom's taxonomy. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that there are 18 items (90%) which are declared valid, and the items are declared reliable with a reliability coefficient of 0.83. The results of the analysis of questions based on Bloom's taxonomy, obtained questions belonging to the ability to understand (C2) as many as 5 items (25%), belonging to the ability to apply (C3) as many as 10 items (50%), and belonging to the ability to analyze (C4) as many as 5 items (25%). There are no questions belonging to the ability to remember (C1), evaluate (C5), and create (C6), then the questions are classified based on the students' thinking criteria, and the questions that are classified as Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are 5 items (25%) and questions that are classified as Medium Order Thinking Skills (MOTS) as many as 15 items (75%).
Keywords: difficulty level, mid-semester assessment, Bloom's taxonomy.
Ahmad, I. F., & Sukiman, S. (2019). Analisis Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) Pada Soal Ujian Akhir Siswa Kelas 6 Kmi Dalam Kelompok Mata Pelajaran Dirosah Islamiyah Di Pondok Modern Tazakka Batang. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 16(2), 137-164.
Antari, B., Susanta, A., & Siagian, T. A. (2021). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Matematika SMA Negeri 8 Kota Bengkulu Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 9(2), 299-312.
Arzfi, B. P., Ananda, R., & Fitria, Y. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Level Kognitif pada Evaluasi Sumatif Mata Pelajaran Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 129-137.
Azizah, N., Hanifah, H., & Sumardi, H. (2021). Analisis Kualitas dan Tingkat Kognitif Soal Matematika Penilaian Akhir Semester Ganjil Kelas IX di SMP N 10 Kota Bengkulu Tahun 2020/2021. Journal Mathematics Education Sigma, 2(2), 51-60.
Effendi, R. (2017). Konsep revisi taksonomi Bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).
Fadhilaturrahmi, F., & Ananda, R. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPS Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom Dua Dimensi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 1(2), 12-21.
Giani, G., Zulkardi, Z., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2015). Analisis tingkat kognitif soal-soal buku teks matematika kelas VII berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 78-98.
Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2016). Taksonomi Bloom–revisi ranah kognitif: kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Premiere educandum: jurnal pendidikan dasar dan pembelajaran, 2(02).
Kholis, R. A. N. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kesulitan (difficulty level) soal pada buku sejarah kebudayaan Islam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 14(2), 305-315.
Lubis, S. S., Syarifuddin, S., & Dongoran, H. Analisis Butir Soal Dan Kemampuan Siswa Menjawab Tes Un Dan Uas Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas Xi Sman/Man Di Kota Medan. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 5(3).
Pandra, V., & Mardapi, D. (2017). Development of Mathematics Achievement Test for Third Grade Students at Elementary School in Indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 769-776.
Pratomo, R. H. S., & Nur, S. M. (2021). Identifikasi Soal Tes UTS dan UAS Mata Pelajaran Biologi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Anderson terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Pembelajaran. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(1), 407-417.
Sari, L. Y. (2017). Analisis Soal Ulangan Harian Pada Materi Ekologi Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Lembang Jaya Kabupaten Solok. Saintifik, 1(2).
Saragih, F. A. (2019). Penerapan Metode HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Jepang Di SMA. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics, 3(2), 147-166.
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23 (2), 2022, 633-641 641
Septiana, N. (2016). Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester (UAS) biologi tahun pelajaran 2015/2016 kelas X dan XI pada MAN Sampit. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 4(2).
Siagian, M. D. (2016). Kemampuan koneksi matematik dalam pembelajaran matematika. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 2(1).
Sumardi, M. (2020). Teknik Pengukuran Dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Deepublish. Susanna, S., Ani, P., & Hamid, A. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kesulitan Soal Try Out Fisika SMA Negeri 5 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(2), 193-197.
Taufiq, A. U. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Kognitif Berbasis Revisi Taksonomi Bloom pada Materi Sistemreproduksi untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Biotek, 3(2), 1-17.
Wahyuni, E. S., Khaldun, I., & Sulastri, S. (2017). Analisis Soal-Soal Ujian Materi Stoikiometri SMA Negeri Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 5(2), 73-79.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.