Problems Analysis in High School Biology Textbooks Based on Cognitive Domain of Bloom Taxonomy
), Syarifah Widya Ulfa(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp833-843
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Amna Fika Sari, Syarifah Widya Ulfa
The purpose of this study is to understand the consistency of questions in class X biology textbooks based on the types of Lower order thinking skills (LOTS) and Higher order thinking skills (HOTS). This descriptive study analyzed questions in high school biology textbook with publishers Erlangga and Prawira Intan. The results showed that the distribution of the LOTS cognitive domain for Erlangga i.e remembering (C1) of 3.75%, understanding (C2) of 95.4%, applying (C3) of 0.75%. Meanwhile, the appearance of the HOTS cognitive domain for Erlangga i.e analyzing (C4) of 70%, evaluating (C5) of 20%, and creating (C6) of 10%. In other publisher Prawira Intan, the LOTS category for C1 of 65.7%, C2 of 31.8%, C3 of 2.41%. The most HOTS cognitive domain in the book publisher Prawira Intan are C4 which is 66.6%, C5 of 20% , and C6 of 13.3%.
Keywords: problem analysis, Biology textbooks, cognitive domain, Bloom taxonomy.
Abdelrahman, M. S. H. B. (2014). An analysis of the tenth grade English language textbooks questions in Jordan based on the revised edition of Bloom's taxonomy. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 139–151.
Ahmad, K. (2018). The implementation of teaching LOTS and HOTS in English teaching-learning process in senior high school. Retain, 6(1).
Andari, D., Rohiat, S., & Nurhamidah, N. (2021). Analisis soal pada buku teks kimia SMA kelas XI berdasarkan ranah kognitif Taksonomi Bloom. Alotrop, 5(2), 175–182.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Anjani, M. Analisis tingkat kognitif soal pada buku teks biologi SMA/MA di Tangerang Selatan berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi (Skripsi, FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).
Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., & Mohandas, R. (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asadin, T. A. Analisis soal uji kompetensi buku sekolah elektronik (BSE) biologi SMA kelas X berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom pada konsep pencemaran lingkungan (Skripsi, FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: Implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368–381.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Hardani, Andriani, H., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Istiqomah, R. R., Fardani, R. A., Sukmana, D. J., & Auliya, N. H. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
Hariyatmi, & Marsiyah, F. (2018). Profil soal buatan guru biologi berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom di SMA Muhammadiyah Surakarta. SNPBSIII. ISSN: 2527–533X.
Herwelis. (2013). Analisis kualitas soal ujian akhir sekolah (UAS) mata pelajaran matematika tingkat SMK Kabupaten Takalar tahun pelajaran 2012/2013 (Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Makassar).
Jailani, J., Retnawati, H., Bukhori, E. A., Djidu, H., & Arifin, Z. (2018). Desain pembelajaran matematika: Untuk melatihkan higher order thinking skills. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Jaya, F. (2019). Perencanaan pembelajaran. Medan: UINSU.
Juhanda, A. (2016). Analisis soal jenjang kognitif Taksonomi Bloom revisi pada Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Biologi SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(1), 61–66.
Juhanda, A., & Maryanto, Y. (2018). The emergence of biological problems in electronic school books (BSE) class X reviewed from the scientific knowledge domain of scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 121–125.
Juita, N. R. (2021). Analisis level kognitif soal trigonometri buku teks matematika SMA/MA kelas X berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains, 9(2), 167–182.
Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2020). Analisis ranah kognitif soal latihan berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom revisi pada buku fisika kelas X (studi pada buku karya Ni Ketut Lasmi). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 115–123.
Nurnaningsih, L. F. (2021). Analisis soal uji kompetensi pada buku teks biologi SMA kelas XI berdasarkan dimensi kognitif Taksonomi Bloom revisi (Skripsi, FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).
Qasrawi, R., & BeniAbdelrahman, A. (2020). The higher and lower-order thinking skills (HOTS and LOTS) in Unlock English textbooks (1st and 2nd editions) based on Bloom's taxonomy: An analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(3), 744–758.
Rinawati, & Utami, T. H. (2013). Analisis kesesuaian soal-soal latihan pada buku teks matematika SMA kelas X dengan kompetensi dasar berdasarkan ranah kognitif Taksonomi Bloom. Himpunan Matematika Indonesia, 5(1).
Suci, I. E., Martini, M., & Purnomo, A. R. (2021). Analisis muatan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) dalam buku IPA kelas VIII SMP bab struktur dan fungsi tumbuhan. Pensa: e-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(3), 316–324.
Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami hakikat dan karakteristik pembelajaran biologi dalam upaya menjawab tantangan abad 21 serta optimalisasi implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Florea, 2(1).
Sugiono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwarno, S., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Irawati, S. (2022). The decision making strategy of prospective mathematics teachers in improving LOTS to be HOTS problem. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 13(1), 1613–1627.
Tanjung, I. F. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran biologi. Medan: CV. Widya Puspita.
Torres, J. M., Collantes, L. M., Millan, A. R., Alieto, E. O., Estigoy, E. B., & Barredo, C. P. (2021). Classification of learning outcomes and assessment activities in CHED prototype and SUC syllabi based on Kratwohl’s Taxonomy. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 497–510.
Wulan, E. R., & Rusdiana. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.