Using Discovery Learning Method to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes in the Topics of Matrix
), Dwi Priyo Utomo(2), Arif Hidayatul Khusna(3)
| 
Country:
(1) SMAN 3 Malang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v20i2.pp54-59
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2019 Retno Trisniwati, Dwi Priyo Utomo, Arif Hidayatul Khusna
The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of discovery learning in a
matrix material. This type of research is a classroom action research study consisting of two cycles with each cycle consisting of four stages: planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 35 students in grade XI. The research instrument used was the observation sheet and test. Data analysis techniques consist of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results showed that there was an increase in student learning outcomes after learning discovery learning was applied. It was proven that in the first cycle there were 15 students (42.8%) who were complete and in the second cycle there were 29 students (82.8%) who were complete.
Keywords: discovery learning, classroom action research, matrix.
de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2014). The guided discovery learning principle in multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition, 371-388.
de Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, 68(2), 179-201.
Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 315-323.
Haeruman, L. D., Rahayu, W., & Ambarwati, L. (2017). Pengaruh model discovery learning terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan selfconfidence ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematis siswa SMA di Bogor Timur.Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2).
National Research Council, & Mathematics Learning Study Committee.
(2002). Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E., & Sweller, J. (2006). Work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological science, 15(10), 661-667.
Laelasari, L. (2013). Upaya menjadi guru profesional. Edunomic: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ekonomi.
Casad, B. J., & Jawaharlal, M. (2012, June). Learning through guided discovery: an engaging approach to K-12 STEM education. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25-886).
Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. S., Lin, S. S., Changlai, M. L., Yang, K. Y., & Lai, T. L. (2012). A review of empirical evidence on scaffolding for science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 437-455.
Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 42(3), 305-326.
Muhson, A. (2010). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2).
Nugrahaeni, A., Redhana, I. W., & Kartawan, I. M. A. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 1(1), 23-29.
Saab, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout‐Wolters, B. H. (2005). Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(4), 603-621.
Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2018). Improving students’ mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in local culture context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-72.
Spronken‐Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research?. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723-740.
Sutawidjaja, A., & Afgani, J. (2015). Konsep dasar pembelajaran
matematika. Pembelajaran Matematika, 1-25.
Taleb, Z., Ahmadi, A., & Musavi, M. (2015). The effect of m-learning on mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 83-89.
Wahjudi, E. (2015). Penerapan Discovery Learning Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Sebagai Upaya untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IX-I di SMP Negeri 1 Kalianget. Jurnal Lensa, 5(1), 1-15.
Widyastuti, E. S. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning pada Materi Konsep Ilmu Ekonomi. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional (Vol. 9, pp. 33-40)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.