The Effect of Argumentation Skills and Problem Based Learning on Science Literacy of High School Students
), Khairuna Khairuna(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp1286-1295
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Mawaddah Handayani, Khairuna Khairuna
rgumentation is one of the methods used to strengthen students' scientific concepts, especially in biology learning. This quantitative study aims to determine the effect of argumentation skills on students' scientific literacy and also to find out the improvement of students' scientific literacy by using argumentation skills of class X IPA-1 MAS CIPTA students of Simpang Dolok village. The population in this study involved the entire class X IPA-1 MAS CIPTA Simpang Dolok village, the sampling in this study used a simple random sampling technique without a control class. The instruments in this study were Essay test questions with scoring that adapted from TAP (Toulmin's Argumentation Petteren) for argumentation skills and essay tests for scientific literacy. The data was collected using a tabular sheet obtained from the argumentation Skill scores and the pretest and posttest scores for scientific literacy. As well as document documentation and photos. The data analysis technique uses the calculation of the N-gain score of scientific literacy due to the influence of Argumentation Skills, while the hypothesis testing uses a simple linear regression test and a paired simple t-test. The results of this study indicate that there is a positive and significant linear effect between argumentation skills on students' scientific literacy and a significant increase in students' scientific literacy using argumentation skills.
Keywords: scientific literacy, problem based learning, argumentation skill.
Abbas, S., & Sawamura, H. (2009). Developing an argument learning environment using agent-based ITS (ALES). EDM’09 - Educational Data Mining 2009: 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 200–209.
Anelli, C. (2011). Scientific literacy: what is it, are we teaching it,and does it matter American Entomologist, 57(4), 235–244.
Dani, D. (2009). Scientific literacy and purposes for teaching science: A case study of lebanese private school teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 289–299.
Devi, N. D. C., Susanti VH, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of high school students’ argumentation ability in the topic of buffer solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 14-26.
Dinata, A. N., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Amprasto, A. (2018). Pengaruh field trip terhadap kemampuan literasi sains dan sikap terhadap sains siswa SMA pada materi ekosistem [The effect of field trip on science literacy ability and attitude towards science of high school students on ecosystem materials]. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 8–13.
Dinatha, N. M., & Laksana, D. N. L. (2017). Kesulitan belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran IPA terpadu [Studens' learning difficulties in integrated science subject], Archipelago Basic Education. 1(2), 214–223.
Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan kemampuan penalaran dengan keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep sistem pencernaan melalui pembelajaran Problem Based Learning [The reliationship between reasoning abiliti and studens' argumentation skills on the concept of the digestive system through Problem Based Learning], Biodidactica, Journal of Biology and Its Learning. 13(2). 36-77
Fakhriyah, F. (2014). Penerapan Problem Based Learning dalam upaya
mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa [Application of Problem Based Learning in an effort to develop studens' critical thinking skills]. Indonesian Science Education Journal, 3(1), 95–101.
Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–8. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377.
Harp, F. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from sientific text and ilustrations: On the distintion between emotional interest in conitive interest. Journal of Education Psyhology, 81(2), 240–246.
Hui, F,. & Komplin, M. (2016). The implementation of authetic activities for learning: A case study in finance education. E-Journal Of Bussines Education &
Scholarship Of Thiching, 5(1), 59–72.
Kwan, A. (2009). Problem-based learning. The Routledge interntional handbook of higher education, 91-109.
Maros, H., & Juniar, S. (2016). Penerapan pembelajaran kontekstual untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dan kualitas argumentasi siswa pondok pesantren Daarul Uluum Pui Majalengka pada diskusi sosiosaintifik IPA [Application of contextual learning to improve scientific literacy and argumentation quality of Daarul Uluum Pui Majalengka Islamic Boarding School students in science socioscientific discussions], Tarbiyah Journal. 21(1), 1–23.
Mayis, O., & Genç, M. (2015). Ondokuz mayıs universitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi the effect of scientific studies on students’ scientific literacy and attitude. Fak. Derg. / OMU J. Fac. Educ, 34(1), 141–152.
Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2018). Upaya peningkatan literasi sains siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis keunggulan lokal [Efforts to improve students' scientific literacy through local excellence-based learning] Biosphere: Tadris Biology Journal, 9(1), 24.
Ogunkola, B. J. (2013). Scientifict literacy: Conceptual overview, importance, and strategis for improvement. Journal of Education and Social Research, 3(1), 265– 274.
Perkins, D. N. (1985). Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasioning.
Journal Of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Segarra, V. A., Hughes, N. M., Ackerman, K. M., Grider, M. H., Lyda, T., & Vigueira, P. A. (2018). Student performance on the test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 1–5.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The us of sientific literacy taxonomy for asessing the develoment of chemical literacy among high-school student.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.
Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami hakikat dan karakteristik pembelajaran biologi dalam upaya menjawab tantangan abad 21 serta optimalisasi implementasi kurikulum [Understanding the nature and characteristics of learning biology in an effort to answer the challenges of the 21st century and optimizing curriculum 2013 implementation]. Florea: Journal of Biology and Its Learning, 2(1), 29–35.
Sugiyono. (2012). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Quantitative Research Methods and R&D (Cet.21). Bandung: Alphabeta.
Suharsimi A. (2019). Research Procedure A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sumarno, U., Hidayat, W., Zukarnaen, R., Hamidah, & Sariningsih, R. (2012). Kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir logis, kritis, dan kreatif matematik [Ability and disposition to think logically, critically, and creatively in mathematics]. MIPA Teaching Journal, 10–27.
Sutrisna, N. (2021). Analisis kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik SMA di kota Sungai Penuh [Analysis of the scientific literacy skills of high school students in the city of Sungai Penuh]. Journal of Research Innovation, (12), 2683.
Udompong, L., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Diagnosis of the scientific literacy characteristics of primary students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5091–5096.
Ulpa, M., Abdurrahman, & Wahyudi, I. (2014). Perbandingan hasil belajar fisika ditinjau dari kemampuan argumentasi oral dan tertulis [Comparison of physics learning outcomes in terms of oral and written argumentation skills]. Journal of Learning Physics, University of Lampung, 2(3), 1–13.
Wulandari, R. (2017). Berpikir ilmiah siswa dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan literasi sains [Students' scientific thinking in science learning to improve scientific literacy]. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 1(1), 29–35.
Yordanka, S., Minevska, M., & Evtimova, S. (2010). Scientific literacy : Problems of science education in bulgarian school. Problems of Education in the 21st Century,PROBLEMS O(mic), 113–118.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.