MoIP-ST: An Instrument to Measure Students’ Problem Solving Skills on Momentum and Impulse
), Ida Kaniawati(2), Achmad Samsudin(3), Endi Suhendi(4), Supardiyono Supardiyono(5), Andreas Suparman(6), Rona Hegarna(7), Rosi Vera(8)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(5) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(6) Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
(7) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(8) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorDOI: DOI not available
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Itsna Rona Wahyu Astuti, Ida Kaniawati, Achmad Samsudin, Endi Suhendi, Supardiyono Supardiyono, Andreas Suparman, Rona Hegarna, Rosi Vera
This research aims to develop the MoIP-ST (Momentum and Impulse ProblemSolving Test) instrument to measure students' problem-solving abilities according to the stages of problem-solving skills. The research method used is 4). The research participants were 64 students, consisting of 32 rural and 32 urban 10th-grade students in East Java, who were randomly selected. The first analysis is a multi-rater Rasch measurement based on the results of expert validation, which indicates that item I1 needs improvement. The second analysis is the analysis of the MoIP-ST instrument using the Rasch model, which shows that overall the items on the MoIP-ST are valid and reliable with a Cronbach Alpha of 0.87. The third analysis is the use of the MoIP-ST, which shows that the problem-solving ability of rural students is lower than that of urban students. Student problem-solving needs to be improved through models, methods, learning models, and teaching materials that support problem-solving.
Keywords: test instrument, problem solving skills, physics learning.
Baig, M., Ali, S. K., Ali, S., & Huda, N. (1969). Quality evaluation of assessment tools: OSPE, SEQ & MCQ. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 30(1), 3–6.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition 3rd Edition. In Maternal & Child Nutrition (Vol. 11, Issue supplement S2).
Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences.
Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M., & Zientarski, W. A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1902_5
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
Darmana, A., Sutiani, A., Nasution, H. A., Sylvia, N. S. A., Aminah, N., & Utami, T. (2021). Analysis of Multi Rater with Facets on Instruments HOTS of Solution Chemistry based on Tawheed. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012038
Dewi, G. A. C., Sunarno, W., & Supriyanto, A. (2019). The needs analysis on module development based on creative problem solving method to improve students’ problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1).
Diawati, C. (2016). Students’ conceptions and problem-solving ability on topic chemical thermodynamics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941152
Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13.
Fadilah, R., & Yohandri. (2019). Need analysis of student worksheet based on tracker on static fluid learning material in high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1).
Gok, T. (2010). The General Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and Metacognition in Physics Education. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 2(2), 110–122.
Güler, N. (2014). Analysis of Open-Ended Statistics Questions with Many Facet Rasch Model. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.5
Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. Developing and Validating Test Items, 1–446. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850381
Hegde, B., & Meera, B. N. (2012). How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 1–9.
Henderson, C. R., Heller, K., Heller, P., Kuo, H. V., & Yerushalmi, E. (2016). Instructors’ Ideas about Problem Solving – Setting Goals. November 2015.
J. Sirait, L. Sutrisno, N. Balta, & A. Mason. (2017). The Development of Questionnaire To Investigate Students’ Attitudes and Approaches in Physics Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(2), 79–87. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpfi
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems.
Kastner, M., & Stangl, B. (2011). Multiple choice and constructed response tests: Do test format and scoring matter? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 263–273.
Koçak, D. (2020). Investigation of rater tendencies and reliability in different assessment methods with many facet rasch model. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 349–358.
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. D. (2013). Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice, 10th Edition. NJ: Willey. https://books.google.cz/books?id=0VkcAAAAQBAJ
Masitoh, P. N. A., Latifah, S., Saregar, A., Aziz, A., Suharto, & Jamaluddin, W. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of physics problem solving. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1).
Mofreh, S. A. M., Ghafar, M. N. A., Hj Omar, A. H., Mosaku, M., & Ma’ruf, A. (2014). Psychometric properties on lecturers’ beliefs on teaching function: Rasch model analysis. International Education Studies, 7(11), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p47
Nadapdap, A. T. Y., & Istiyono, E. (2017). Developing physics problem-solving skill test for grade X students of senior high school. Research and Evaluation in Education, 3(2)(1), 114–123.
Ng, S. E., Yeo, K. J., & Mohd Kosnin, A. B. (2018). Item Analysis for the Adapted Motivation Scale Using Rasch Model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i4.15376
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems (Volume V): Vol. V. OECD Publishing.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It. In How to Solve It.
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 30, Issue 04).
Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(2), 146–153.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarsho, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assesment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Penilaian Pendidikan dan Ujian. Aplikasi Rasch Pemodelan Pada Assessment Pendidikan, 1–4.
Sutarno, S., Setiawan, A., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2017). Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Problem-solving Skills in Projectile Motion Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1).
Talib, R., Iahad, N. A., Ashari, Z. M., Rameli, M. R. M., Bakar, Z. A., & Dollah, R. (2019). Rasch strategies for evaluating quality of the Conceptions and Alternative assessment Survey (CETAS). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12A), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071902
Wulantri, Distrik, I. W., Suyatna, A., & Rosidin, U. (2020). The Effectiveness of Creative-Inquiry-Based Student Worksheet in Improving Physics Self-Efficacy and Problem Solving of Senior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.