Inquiry Learning Model in Chemistry Education: A Systematic Literature Review
), Sri Rahayu(2), I Wayan Dasna(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp681-691
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Intan Diah Purwandari, Sri Rahayu, I Wayan Dasna
Currently in the 21st century, students are required to master various abilities and thinking skills. Students' abilities do not develop well with learning that only focuses on convergent thinking training. As a result, students have difficulty in developing and improving their ability to master the learning material. Therefore, it is necessary to have an appropriate learning model to improve students' abilities. Based on this, one of the alternative learning models that can improve students' abilities is the Inquiry Learning model. This article aims to provide an overview of the application of the Inquiry Learning model to the achievement of learning objectives in chemistry so that it can improve students' abilities. The method used is a systematic literature review from a literature review with relevant and reputable sources during the period 2017 to 2021. The results show that the inquiry learning model was able to improve students' ability to learn chemistry.
Keywords: chemistry, critical thinking, inquiry learning model.
Adnan, G., Zulfikar, T., Armia, M. S., Gade, S., & Walidin, W. (2021). Impacts of inquiry learning model on students’ cognitive and critical thinking ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(3), 1290–1299.
Aisyah, R. S. S. (2016). Penerapan Peer Instruction with Structure Inquiry (PISI) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia siswa [Application of Peer Instruction with Structure Inquiry (PISI) to improve students' chemistry learning outcomes]. EduChemia, 1(2), 2502–4787.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomnyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959.
Cartwright, T. J., & Hallar, B. (2018). Taking risks with a growth mindset: Long-term influence of an elementary pre-service after school science practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 348–370.
Dewi, C. A., & Mashami, R. A. (2019). The effect of chemo-entrepreneurship oriented inquiry module on improving students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 253–263.
Jonathon, G., Visctor, S., & Barry, G. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of verification and inquiry laboratories in supporting undergraduate science students in constructing arguments around socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1412–1433.
Nalan, A., & Melis, A. (2017). Step by step learning using the I diagram in the systematic qualitative analyses of cations within a guided inquiry learning approach. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 641–658.
Perdana, R., Rudibyani, R. B., Budiyono, Sajidan, & Sukarmin. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry social complexity to improving critical and creative thinking skills of senior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 477–490.
Pitukpong, K., Sirinapa, K., & Wipharat, C. C. (2018). An action research on enhancing grade 10 student creative thinking skills using argument-driven inquiry model in the topic of chemical environment. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 9–13.
Rasmawan, R. (2020). Development of SETS-based teaching materials in acid base accompanied by critical thinking exercises and moral forming. EduChemia, 5(2), 2502–4787.
Treagust, D. F., Sheila, S. Q., Venkat, R. V., Joseph, O., Mauro, M., & Daniel, C. S. (2018). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) as a culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A perspective from grade 10 chemistry classes. Research in Science Education, 50, 813–831.
Vishnumolakala, V. R., et al. (2018). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences in a modified process-oriented guided inquiry learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 340–352.
Zuiker, S. J., & Whitaker, J. R. (2014). Refining inquiry with multiform assessment: Formative and summative assessment functions for flexible inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 1037–1059.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.