Applying the Education for Sustainable Development Approach to Energy Instruction Design for Encouraging Scientific Literacy of Junior High School Students
), Hernani Hernani(2), Ida Kaniawati(3) (1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2022 Wahyu Eka Fath Dieni, Hernani Hernani, Ida Kaniawati
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to produce learning designs on energy materials with the Educational for Sustainable Development (ESD) approach to develop scientific literacy that is validated and tested on a limited scale. This research uses Design and Development Research model, which uses 6 stages of the D&D model, namely 1) Identify the problems motivating the research; 2) Describe the objectives; 3) Design and develop the artifact; 4) Subject the artifact to testing; 5) Evaluating test results; and 6) Communicating test results. Interview guidelines, lesson plans, validation sheets, and worksheets are the main instruments in this research. The results are indicators derived from content standards can be found with ESD elements, and the learning design developed is considered feasible to be applied in learning. The principle in implementing ESD elements in learning is student-oriented, making the environment a source of learning and connecting local and global issues.
Keywords: education for sustainable development, scientific learning, learning design
References
Tentu, ini daftar pustaka ketiga yang sudah saya rapikan:
Alexandar, R., & Poyyamoli, G. (2014). The effectiveness of environmental education for sustainable development based on active teaching and learning at high school level-a case study from Puducherry and Cuddalore regions, India. Journal of Sustainability Education, 7(1), 1–20.
Allison, E., & Goldston, M. J. (2018). Modern scientific literacy: A case study of multiliteracies and scientific practices in a fifth grade classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(3), 270–283.
Asyhari, A., & Silvia, H. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berupa buletin dalam bentuk buku saku untuk pembelajran IPA terpadu [Development of learning media in the form of a bulletin in the form of a pocket book for integrated science learning]. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni [Journal of Physics Education Al-Biruni], 5(1), 1–13.
Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59–68.
Churchill, D., King, M., & Fox, B. (2013). Learning design for science education in the 21st century. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 45(2), 404–421.
Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158.
Ekantini, A., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). The Development of Science Student Worksheet Based on Education for Environmental Sustainable Development to Enhance Scientific Literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1339–1347.
Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2010, June). A guide for novice researchers: Design and development research methods. In Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE) (Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 107–117).
Fatiyah, H. N., & Solihat, R. (2021, March). Development of learning tools education for sustainable development (ESD) integrated problem-solving for high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012157). IOP Publishing.
Guevara, C. A. (2015). Science Literacy, Awareness, and Attitude Enhancement through Integration of Sustainable Development Education in General Ecology. IAMURE International Journal of Ecology and Conservation, 14(1), 1–1.
Hestiana, H., & Rosana, D. (2020). The effect of problem based learning based sosio-scientific issues on scientific literacy and problem-solving skills of junior high school students. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 15–21.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Holdsworth, S., & Sandri, O. (2014). Sustainability education and the built environment: Experiences from the classroom. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 9(1), 48–68.
Jegstad, K. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2015). Chemistry teaching for the future: A model for secondary chemistry education for sustainable development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 655–683.
Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific Literacy and Science Learning Achievement at Junior High School. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636.
Kaya, V. H., & Elster, D. (2019). Dimensions affecting environmental literacy, and environmental perceptions influencing science literacy. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 3(6), 70–77.
Karaarslan, G., & Teksöz, G. (2016). Integrating Sustainable Development Concept into Science Education Program Is Not Enough; We Need Competent Science Teachers for Education for Sustainable Development--Turkish Experience. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 8403–8425.
Kemdiknas. (2010). Ringkasan Eskekutif: Model Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan [Executive Summary: Education Model for Sustainable Development]. Tim Studi Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan.
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan [Implementation of Curriculum 2013 Concept and Application]. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–162.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do - Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). OECD Publishing. Paris-France.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. Paris-France.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. Paris-France.
Oghenekohwo, J. E., & Frank-Oputu, E. A. (2017). Literacy education and sustainable development in developing societies. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 126–131.
Pradipta, D. D., & Hariyono, E. (2021). The Effectiveness of Science Learning Tools Based on Education Sustainable Development (ESD) to Improve Problem-Solving Skills. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(3), 342–353.
Putri, S. D., Ulhusna, M., Zakirman, Z., & Gusta, W. (2020). Improvement Of Student Science Literacy Skills Through Edmodo-based Teaching Materials In Learning Science In Elementary School. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(3), 4649–4652.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 141–150). Springer, New York, NY.
Spiropoulou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S., & Bouras, S. (2007). Primary teachers’ literacy and attitudes on education for sustainable development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 443–450.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.