Development of REACT-Based E-Module to Improve Students' Scientific Literacy Ability in Buffer Solution

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Copyright (c) 2022 Aroma Karmila, Desy Kurniawati, Hardeli Hardeli, Umar Kalmar Nizar
Article Metrics→ |
Indexing Database→ | ![]() |
![]() |
Abstract
The buffer solution e-module based on the REACT strategy (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Collaborating, Transferring) has been developed and analysed for its validity and practicality levels to assist the learning process of students to train students' scientific literacy skills. This research belongs to the type of EDR (Educational Design). Research) with the Plomp model. The research tools used were interview forms, validity questionnaires, and practicality. This e-module has been verified by six expert reviews, and 9 students became research subjects in this development research. Data were analysed using Aikens'V formula, and practicality percentage. Analysis of the validity of the questionnaire data showed an Aikens' V average score of 0.89 (for construct validity). Analysis of the practicality questionnaire data showed an average score of 83% and 83% (for small groups and field practice tests). Data analysis shows that the e-module has a high level of validity and practicality. Therefore, it can be concluded that the buffer solution e-module teaching material based on the REACT strategy is valid and practical so that it is feasible to use it in learning to train students' scientific literacy skills.
Keywords: e-module, REACT strategy, buffer solution, scientific literacy
References
Tentu, ini daftar pustaka ketujuh tanpa jarak/enter:
Adriyani, E. L., & Wulandari, T. S. H. (2018). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Berbasis Kontekstual Dilengkapi Glosarium Pada Materi Perubahan Iklim Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 379-387).
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, 45(1), 131-142.
Anggraini, H. G. (2014). Analisis Output dan Outcome Bidang Pendidikan dalam Era Otonomi Daerah di Jawa Tengah. Dinamika Pendidikan, 9(1).
Ariani, R., & Fauzi, A. (2021, April). The practicality of interactive multimedia integrated science based on guided inquiry with theme energy in the life that integrates of learning for the 21st century. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1876, No. 1, p. 012051). IOP Publishing.
Arifin, A. T., Kartono, K., & Sutarto, H. (2014). Keefektifan Strategi Pembelajaran React Pada Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VII Aspek Komunikasi Matematis. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(1), 91-98.
Batooli, Z., Fahimnia, F., Naghshinih, N., & Mirhosseini, F. (2018). Information Literacy Gamified Online Tutorial. In 2018 12th Iranian and 6th International Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICeLeT) (pp. 001-006). IEEE.
Bilgin, A. K., YÜRÜKEL, F. N. D., & YİĞİT, N. (2017). The effect of a developed react strategy on the conceptual understanding of students:" Particulate nature of matter". Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 65-81.
Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching contextually. Research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in mathematics and science. Texas: Cord.
Gilbert, L. A., Gross, D. S., & Kreutz, K. J. (2019). Developing undergraduate students’ systems thinking skills with an InTeGrate module. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 34-49.
Hadinugrahaningsih, T., & Kurniadewi, F. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi “REACT” Terhadap Literasi Kimia Peserta Didik Kelas X MIA Pada Pembelajaran Reaksi Redoks. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 9(1), 14-20.
Handayani, N. (2015). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran react dengan pendekatan rme untuk meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi matematis. J. Semin. Nas. Mat, 233-40.
Handini, D., Gusrayani, D., & Panjaitan, R. L. (2016). Penerapan model contextual teaching and learning meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas IV pada materi gaya. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 451-460.
Harden, R. M., Gessner, I. H., Gunn, M., Issenberg, S. B., Pringle, S. D., & Stewart, A. (2011). Creating an e-learning module from learning objects using a commentary or ‘personal learning assistant’. Medical teacher, 33(4), 286-290.
Hayat, B., & Yusuf, S. (2010). Benchmark internasional mutu pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Herlina, E., & Ilmadi, I. (2022). The Implementation of REACT Strategy in Training Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Ta'dib, 25(1), 47-58.
Jelatu, S., & Ardana, I. (2018). Effect of GeoGebra-Aided REACT Strategy on Understanding of Geometry Concepts. International journal of instruction, 11(4), 325-336.
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9-15.
Karsli, F., & Yigit, M. (2017). Effectiveness of the REACT strategy on 12th grade students’ understanding of the alkenes concept. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(3), 274-291.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Praktis Penyusunan E-Modul [Practical Guide to E-Module Preparation]. Jakarta : Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.
Khairani, S., Asrizal, A., & Amir, H. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Ipa Terpadu Berorientasi Pembelajaran Kontekstual Tema Pemanfaatan Tekanan Dalam Kehidupan Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Pillar of Physics Education, 10(1).
Kimianti, F., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2019). Pengembangan e-modul ipa berbasis problem based learning untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 91-103.
Kumar, P., Saxena, C., & Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-15.
Laili, I. (2019). Efektivitas pengembangan e-modul project based learning pada mata pelajaran instalasi. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3, 306–315.
Laksono, P. J. (2018). Studi Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Pada Materi Pengelolaan Limbah. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 1-12.
Lawshe. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.
Muljono. (2007). Kegiatan penilaian buku teks pelajaran pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Buletin Bsnp Media Komunikasi Dan Dialog Standar Pendidikan, II(1).
Nanto, D., ‘Aini, A. N., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2017). Android worksheet application based on discovery learning on students’ achievement for vocational high school: Mechanical behavior of materials topics. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1848, No. 1, p. 050006). AIP Publishing LLC.
Permana, W. B. (2017). Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Project Based Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Pemrograman Berorientasi Objek Kelas XI RPL di SMK Negeri 2 Tabanan. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika: JANAPATI, 6(2), 140-154.
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research educational design research. Netherlands Institute For Curriculum Development: slo, 1–206.
Raharjo, M. W. C., Suryati, S., & Khery, Y. (2017). Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Menggunakan Adobe Flash Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia Untuk Mendorong Literasi Sains Siswa. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 5(1), 8-13.
Riswandi, B. A. (2013). Peningkatan Kualitas Siswa Terampil Iptek Dengan Edukasi Komputer Bagi Siswa Di Dusun Wonolelo. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(02), 94-98.
Rizka, N. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMAN 2 Payakumbuh (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Padang).
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 559-572). Routledge.
Sapto, A. D., Suyitno, H., & Susilo, B. E. (2015). Keefektifan pembelajaran strategi react dengan model sscs terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematika dan percaya diri siswa kelas VIII. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3).
Saputri, G. L., Wardono, W., & Karisudin, I. (2019). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Pembentukan Kemampuan 4C dengan Strategi REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring). In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 2, pp. 563-571).
Sariningsih, R. (2014). Pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMP. Infinity Journal, 3(2), 150-163.
Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32-45.
Srikandi, N. (2020). Validitas dan praktikalitas buku teks pelajaran mengintegrasikan CTL dan literasi lingkungan materi gelombang mekanik dan persamaan gelombang untuk siswa SMA kelas XI. Pillar Of Physics Education, 13(3).
Tessmer, M. (2013). Planning and conducting formative evaluations. Routledge.
Ültay, N., & Çalik, M. (2015). A comparison of different teaching designs of ‘acids and bases’ subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 57-86.
Warlinda, Y. A., Yerimadesi, Y., Hardeli, H., & Andromeda, A. (2022). Implementation of Guided Discovery Learning Model with SETS Approach Assisted by E-Modul Chemistry on Scientific Literacy of Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 507-514.
Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Shubeck, K., Hu, X., Huang, R., & Zhu, L. (2021). Teachers’ adoption of an open and interactive e-book for teaching K-12 students Artificial Intelligence: a mixed methods inquiry. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-20.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.