Analysis of The Creativity of Senior High School Students Through The C-R-E-A-T-E Learning Model
), Ali Kusrijadi(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1673-1682
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Wawan Wahyu, Ali Kusrijadi
This study aims to analyze students' creativity through the C-R-E-A-T-E learning model in a blended system. Voltaic Cell was chosen as the material studied because the process of making Voltaic Cells can support the development of students' creativity. The research method used was Design Based Research (DbR). The research instrument used was a creativity observation sheet according to William's creativity indicator and an assessment sheet for students' creative products which included three main skills: creating, investigating, and problem-solving skills. The results of this study indicate that the step-by-step C-R-E-A-T-E learning model implemented through a blended system supported by Google Classroom can develop students' creativity, both in terms of creative processes and creative products. It was shown from the observation results of students' creativity on the indicators of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, originality, and evaluation each included in the very good category. In addition, the average score of students' creative product assessment is also in the very good category. These results indicate that the learning model is feasible to be applied in learning as an effort to develop student creativity.
Keywords: students’ creativity, the C-R-E-A-T-E model, senior high school.
Ana, A., Azmi, C., Widiaty, I., Widaningsih, I., Dwiyanti, V., Subekti, S., & Muktiarni, M. (2022). Development of learning guide with Project-based blended learning in vocational high schools during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(2), 131-136.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Dasar dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Armitage, R., Pihl, O., & Ryberg, T. (2015). PBL and creative process. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 1-4.
Asih, D. N., Wijayanti, I. E., & Langitasari, I. (2020). Development of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) integrated chemical module on voltaic cells. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 5(1), 91-103.
Bakhtiar, M. I., Saman, A., Irfan, I., Irfan, A., Bakhtiar, B., Syamsuardi, S., & Ratnawulandari, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of classical tutoring services through blended learning based on google classroom applications to improve students’ self-regulated learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(2), 819-830.
Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541-550.
Briskman, L. (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and art. Inquiry, 23(1), 83-106.
Bliersbach, M., & Reiners, C. S. (2017). “Creating creativity”: improving pre-service teachers’ conceptions about creativity in chemistry. In Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research (pp. 55-68). Cham: Springer.
Davydove, V. V. (1995). The influence of L.S. Vigotsky on education theory, research, and practice. Education Researcher, 24(3), 12-21.
Delia, J. G. (1977). Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63(1), 66-83.
Heliawati, L., & Rubini, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of STEM-Modeling-based e-modules of voltaic cell-material on creativity and concept mastery through online learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(7), 783-798.
Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 4089-4097). Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2015). Pengaruh project based learning terhadap motivasi belajar, kreativitas, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan kognitif siswa pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1), 9-21.
Isabekov, A., & Sadyrova, G. (2018). Project-based learning to develop creative abilities in students. In Vocational Teacher Education in Central Asia (pp. 43-49). Springer, Cham.
Jegstad, K. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2015). Chemistry teaching for the future: A model for secondary chemistry education for sustainable development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 655-683.
Labuske, K., & Streb, J. (2008). Technological creativity and cheap labor? Explaining the growing international competitiveness of German mechanical engineering before World War I. German Economic Review, 9(1), 65-86.
Lou, S., Chou, Y., & Shih, R. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404.
Moore, D. (1999). Toward a theory of work-based learning. IEE Brief. Retrieved from http://www.tc.columbia.edu/iee/BRIEFS/Brief23.htm
Morphew, V. N. (2002). Web-based learning and instruction: A constructivist approach. In Web-based instructional learning (pp. 1-14). IGI Global.
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In Educational Design Research (pp. 152-169). Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
Nuswowati, M., Susilaningsih, E., Ramlawati, R., & Kadarwati, S. (2017). Implementation of problem-based learning with green chemistry vision to improve creative thinking skill and students’ creative actions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 221-228.
Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(436), 1-8.
Sani, R.A. (2015). Pembelajaran saintifik untuk implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teacher. Retrieved from htpp://www.bgsu.edu/organization/ctl/proj.html
Tran, L. T. B., Ho, N. T., & Hurle, R. J. (2016). Teaching for creativity development: Lessons learned from a preliminary study of Vietnamese and international upper (high) secondary school teachers’ perceptions and lesson plans. Creative Education, 7(1), 1024-1043.
Treffinger, D. J., County, V., Gifted, N. S. L. T. I. O. T., & Talented, T. (1980). Encouraging creative learning for the gifted and talented: A handbook of methods and techniques. Camarillo: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
Trivić, D., Tomašević, B., & Vuković, I. (2012). Students creativity in chemistry classes. Giornale di Didattica e Cultura della Società Chimica Italian. Proceedings of 22nd ICCECRICE, 393-398 July 2012. Rome, Italy.
Tuan, N. N., Hanh, B. T., & Ninh, T. T. (2020). Project based learning in general chemistry to develop the problem-solving and creativity. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 475-479.
Van den Akker et al. (2010). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. The Netherlands: Netzodruk, Enchede. http://www.slo.nl/organisatie/international/publication.
Voorhees, R. A., & Bedard-Voorhees, A. (2016). Principles for competency-based education. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV (pp. 33-64). Routledge.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.
Wahyu, W., Kurnia, & Eli, R. N. (2016). Using problem-based learning to improve students’ creative thinking skills on water purification. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1708, No. 1, p. 040008). AIP Publishing LLC.
Wahyu, W., Oktiani, R., & Komalia, K. (2020). Effectiveness of CREATE model on building student creativity in making natural voltaic cells. In Borderless Education as a Challenge in the 5.0 Society: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Sciences (ICES 2019). London: Routledge.
Yoon, H., Woo, A. J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Second-year college students’ scientific attitudes and creative thinking ability: Influence of a problem-based learning (PBL) chemistry laboratory course. In Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 217-233). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Yonwilad, W., & Sinlapaninman, U. (2022). Blended learning and creativity-based learning for promoting mathematics achievement and information technology performance. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 535-545.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.