Performance Assessment with Multiple Intelligence Differentiation to Measure Communication Skills: Application of Many Facet Rasch Model

Aulia Rahman(1,Mail), Winny Liliawati(2), Dadi Rusdiana(3) | CountryCountry:


(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author


Indexing:
Integrity:
Similarity:
AI Score:

© 2023 Aulia Rahman, Winny Liliawati, Dadi Rusdiana

Abstract: This research aims to determine the characteristics of the PABMMSB instrument. Comprising seven task types and assessment rubrics measuring communication skills across four indicators. Employing a Mixed Methods Exploratory Sequential: Instrument development model with purposive sampling, the study involved 39 prospective physics teacher students. Data was obtained from 5 types of assignments that were selected and then assessed by seven raters and the result was that IKK01 did not meet the ZStd score criteria with a value of -2.2. However, because the MnSq (0.82) and PtMea (0.59) values have met the criteria, the ZStd value can be ignored and IKK01 is still declared valid, and for IKK02, IKK03, and IKK04 all have met the criteria and all indicators tested have met the criteria and are declared valid to measure communication skills. Apart from that, a reliability value of 0.87 was obtained and was included in the Very Good criteria.

 

Keywords: characteristics, performance assessment, multiple intelligences, communication skills, rasch model, facet.

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui karakteristik instrumen PABMMSB. Instrumen yang dikembangkan terdiri dari tujuh jenis tugas dan rubrik penilaian untuk mengukur keterampilan komunikasi dengan empat indikator. Penelitian ini menggunakan Mixed Methods Exploratory Sequential: Instrument development model dengan teknik purposive sampling. Uji coba dilakukan kepada 39 orang mahasiswa calon guru fisika didapatkan data dari 5 jenis tugas yang dipilih kemudian dinilai oleh tujuh orang rater dan didapatkan hasil bahwa IKK01 tidak memenuhi kriteria nilai ZStd dengan nilai -2.2. akan tetapi karena nilai MnSq (0.82) dan PtMea (0.59) sudah memenuhi kriteria maka nilai ZStdnya bisa diabaikan dan IKK01 tetap dinyatakan valid, dan untuk IKK02, IKK03, dan IKK04 semuanya telah memenuhi kriteria dan seluruh indikator yang di ujikan memenuhi kriteria dan dinyatakan valid untuk mengukur keterampilan komunikasi. Selain itu, didapatkan nilai reliabilitas sebesar 0.87 dan termasuk kedalam kriteria Bagus sekali.

 

Kata kunci: karakteristik, penilaian kinerja, kecerdasan majemuk, keterampilan komunikasi, rasch model, facet.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i4.pp9232-943


Abizar. (1988). Komunikasi organisasi. [organizational communication]. Jakarta: Ministry of Education & Culture, Directorate General of Higher Education P2LPTK.

Anggraeni, R., & Arfa, M. (2017). Efektivitas produk kemas ulang informasi berupa infografis sebagai media pembelajaran mata pelajaran ipa (studi eksperimen pada siswa kelas vii di smpn 1 tembarak kabupaten temanggung). [the effectiveness of repackaged information products in the form of infographics as a Learning Media for Science Subjects (Experimental Study on 7th Grade Students at SMPN 1 Tembarak, Temanggung Regency)]. Library Science Journal, 6(1), 241-250.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. [evaluation of learning]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J.R. and Yale, M.S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecth: Springer.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Reseach design: pendekatan, kualitatif, kuantitatif, & mixed. [research design: qualitative, quantitative, & mixed approaches]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darmana, A., Sutiani, A., & Jasmidi. (2020). Development of the thermochemistry- hots-tawheed multiple choice instrument. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1462. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012057.

Fitria, U., Vianty, M., & Petrus, I. (2015). Using podcast to improve students’ listening & speaking achievements. Journal of English Literacy Education, 2(1), 55–68.

Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basics Book. 235-66.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 409-426.

Hambleton, R.K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Inc.

Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational research methods, 1(1), 104-121.

Jasmine, J. (2007). Panduan praktis mengajar berbasis multiple intelligences. [Practical Guide to Teaching Based on Multiple Intelligences]. Bandung: Nuansa.

Kuo, E. C. Y., Hooper, M. L., & Carney, R. N. (2014). Using public speaking as a measure of communication competence: relationships between perceived & objective measures. Communication Education, 63(2), 107-122.

Liliawati, W., Iryanti, M., dan Ardi, N. D., (2020). Pengembangan earth & space tier test: konsepsi alternatif & sumber penyebab miskonsepsi mahasiswa dengan teknik confidence accuracy quotient. [development of earth & space tier test: alternative conceptions & sources of student misconceptions using the confidence accuracy quotient technique]. Final Report of the Research Grant from UPI.

Liliawati, W., Rustaman, N., Hendriwijaya, D., & Rusdiana, D. (2014). Penerapan perkuliahan IPBA terintegrasi berbasis kecerdasan majemuk untuk menanamkan karakter diri & meningkatkan penguasaan konsep bintang. [Implementation of integrated earth & space education lectures based on multiple intelligences to instill personal character & improve understanding of star concepts]. Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Teaching, 19(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i1.428.

Makiyah, Y. S., Mahmudah, I. R., Sulistyaningsih, D., & Susanti, E. (2021). Hubungan keterampilan komunikasi abad 21 dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa pendidikan fisika. [the relationship between 21st century communication skills and problem-solving skills of physics education students]. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics 6 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.9412.

McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1996). Communication and competence: Basic concepts & issues. Waveland Press, Inc.

Medriati, R., & Risdianto, E. (2020). Penerapan pendekatan student centered learning (SCL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif & komunikatif mahasiswa pendidikan fisika semester III universitas Bengkulu. [Application of the student-centered learning (scl) approach to enhance creative & communicative thinking skills of third semester physics education students at the university of Bengkulu]. Kumparan Physics Journal, 3(1), 67-74.

Miranti, I., Engliana, & Hapsari, F. S. (2015). Penggunaan media lagu anak-anak dalam mengembangkan kemampuan kosakata bahasa inggris siswa di paud. [the use of children's song media in developing english vocabulary skills of kindergarten students]. Factors in Educational Scientific Journals, 2 (2). 167-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/fjik.v2i2.382.

Muhammad, A. (2016). Komunikasi organisasi. [organizational communication]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Myers, K. K., & Anderson, N. R. (2008). Assessing oral communication skills: A review of the literature and strategies for assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 83(5), 298-304.

Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century. Penguin.

Pribadi, B. A., Lestari, S. (2011). Tes performa & kecerdasan majemuk. [performance & multiple intelligences tests]. Education Journal. (12)1. 62–73.doi.org/10.33830/jp.v12i1.491.2011.

Purwanto. (2019). Improving students' communicative competence in speaking through community service. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 10(2), 241-247. doi: 10.17507/jltr.1002.04

Rachmawati, F., Muhajarah, K., & Kamaliah, N. (2019). Mengukur efektivitas podcast sebagai media perkuliahan inovatif pada mahasiswa. Justek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 2(1), 38-44.

Eko. R (2019). Analisis pendidikan indonesia di era revolusi industri 4.0. [analysis of education in indonesia in the era of the fourth industrial revolution]. Bengkulu: University of Bengkulu.

Rizawati, (2022). Meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi (communicationskill) & hasil belajar siswa melalui pembelajaran saintifik dengan memanfaatkan media infografis. [improving communication skills & student learning outcomes through scientific learning using infographic media]. EDUTECH: Journal of Technologically Assisted Educational Innovation, 2(1), 55-62.

Skobelev, P., & Borovik, Y. S. (2017). On the way from industri 4.0 to industri 5.0: from digital manufacturing to digital society. International Scientific Research Journal Industri4.0, 307- 311.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim komunikata.

Supriyono, R. (2010). Desain komunikasi visual, teori, & aplikasi. [visual communication design, theory, & application]. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated Instruction. Fundamentals of Gifted Education, 279-292.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading & managing differentiated instruction. In Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Zellatifanny, C. M. (2020). Tren diseminasi konten audio on demand melalui podcast: sebuah peluang & tantangan di indonesia. [trends in audio on demand content dissemination through podcasts: opportunities & challenges in Indonesia]. Pekommas Journal, vol. 5(2), 117- 132.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.