The Effect of Science e-Module to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on the Object Classification Topic

Fahmi Fahmi(1,Mail), Yudha Irhasyuarna(2), Suryajaya Suryajaya(3), Hery Fajeriadi(4) | CountryCountry:


(1) Department of Natural Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(2) Department of Natural Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(3) Department of Physics, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(4) Department of Biology Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

DOI 10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp1624-1641
Metrics→
              
Indexing Site→


Download Full Text: PDF

Copyright (c) 2025 Fahmi Fahmi, Yudha Irhasyuarna, Suryajaya Suryajaya, Hery Fajeriadi


This study aims to develop innovative science teaching materials based on higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) to enhance students’ critical thinking skills on the topic of object classification. The research adopted the ADDIE development model, which consists of five stages: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The study involved 60 seventh-grade junior high school students as research subjects. Data were collected using expert validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and pretest-posttest instruments to assess students’ critical thinking skills. The results of expert validation indicated that the developed teaching materials were categorized as “highly valid,” with an average score of 92.5%, reflecting the quality in terms of content, presentation, language, and design. During implementation, students showed an increase in critical thinking performance. The average pretest score was 58.3, which improved to 78.7 in the posttest. A paired sample t-test analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between pretest and posttest scores (t = 8.624; p < 0.001), indicating the effectiveness of the developed material in improving critical thinking skills. Furthermore, student responses to the teaching materials were very positive, with an average score of 88.4%, suggesting that the materials were well-received and engaging. This study provides empirical support for integrating innovative HOTS-oriented learning materials into science instruction, particularly for foundational topics such as object classification. The findings contribute to the field of science education research and offer practical implications for the development of curriculum materials that foster critical thinking in junior high school students. These results can be used as a reference for educators and curriculum developers in designing effective, student-centered science learning tools.   

 

Keywords: ADDIE model, critical thinking, instructional design, object classification, science teaching materials.


Akker, J. van den. (2010). Curriculum design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (pp. 37–52). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Anggraenya, E., & Khongput, S. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of critical thinking instruction in Indonesian senior high schools: a case study. TEFLIN Journal, 33(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i1/1-26

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students’ achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(10), 1038–1046. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380559513_Bilgin.pdf

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills: developing effective analysis and argument. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: an outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://courseware.e-education.psu.edu/downloads/geog882/Critical%20Thinking%20What%20it%20is%20and%20why%20it%20counts.pdf

Fahmi, F., Chalisah, N., Istyadji, M., Irhasyuarna, Y., & Kusasi, M. (2022). Scientific literacy on the topic of light and optical instruments in the innovation of science teaching materials. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i2.41343

Fajeriadi, H., Zaini, M., Dharmono, D., Nugroho, B. A., Fahmi, F., & Fitriani, A. (2024). The popular scientific book-based coastal gastropod’s diversity as local potential: Practicality and effectiveness on students’ critical thinking ability. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(2), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.32255

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University. https://physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: what it is and why it is here to stay. Corwin Press.

Khaeruddin, K., Indarwati, S., Sukmawati, S., Hasriana, H., & Afifah, F. (2023). An analysis of students’ higher order thinking skills through the project-based learning model on science subject. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v19i1.34259

Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Cocoradă, E., Dovleac, L., Lixăndroiu, R. C., Maican, M. A., & Cocoradă, S. A. (2024). The role of contextual and individual factors in successful e-learning experiences during and after the pandemic–a two-year study. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 589-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00323-0

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

MoEC. (2008). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508

Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research - Part A: An Introduction (pp. 152–169). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Routledge.

Nurhasanah, M., Suprapto, P. K., & Ardiansyah, R. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning assisted by articulate storyline interactive students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v10i1.64847

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Pahrudin, A., Misbah, M., Alisia, G., Saregar, A., Asyhari, A., Anugrah, A., & Susilowati, N. E. (2021). The effectiveness of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics inquiry learning for 15–16-year-old students based on the K-13 Indonesian Curriculum: The impact on the critical thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu jer.10.2.681

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research – part a: an introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Pursitasari, I. D., Suhardi, E., Putra, A. P., & Rachman, I. (2020). Enhancement of students’ critical thinking skills through science context-based inquiry learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21884

Rahmawati, S., Masykuri, M., & Sarwanto, S. (2021). The effectiveness of discovery learning module classification of materials and its changes to enhance critical thinking skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v7i1.33253

Rukoyah, S., & Bektiningsih, K. (2024). Development of interactive learning media based on a smart app creator to enhance elementary school students’ science learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(10), 8127–8135. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.8046

Sari, F. R. (2019). Needs analysis in the development of natural science teachers’ book of Junior High School based on local wisdom of West Sumatra. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1185, No. 1, p. 012101). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012101

Shalihah, F., Harlita, H., & Saputra, A. (2023). Differences in students’ critical thinking skills and interest with guided inquiry and learning videos. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 9(3), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i3.26715

Sinaga, P., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, A. (2017). Improving secondary school student scientific literacy ability through the design of better science textbook. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10215a

Solihati, N., & Hikmat, A. (2018). Critical thinking tasks manifested in Indonesian language textbooks for senior secondary students. SAGE Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018802164

Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402

UNESCO. (2002). Information and communication technology in education: a curriculum for schools and programme of teacher development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000129531

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Walsh, C., Quinn, K. N., Wieman, C., & Holmes, N. G. (2019). Quantifying critical thinking: development and validation of the physics lab inventory of critical thinking (PLIC). arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.06961. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.06961

Wibowo, A. (2015). Pendidikan karakter berbasis kearifan lokal di sekolah. Pustaka Pelajar.

Wijayanti, D., Jailani, J., & Retnowati, E. (2020). Development of interactive multimedia with ADDIE model to improve mathematical reasoning ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13453a

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.