The Effect of Socratic Questioning-Based Student Worksheets on Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills

Laila Hayati(1), Suyidno Suyidno(2,Mail), Sauqina Sauqina(3), Yasmine Khairunnisa(4), Abd Rahman NF(5) | CountryCountry:


(1) Department of Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(2) Department of Physics Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(3) Department of Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(4) Department of Science Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
(5) Department of Innovative Science and Mathematics Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

MailCorresponding Author

Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:
-

© 2025 Laila Hayati, Sauqina Sauqina, Yasmine Khairunnisa, Suyidno Suyidno

The Effect of Socratic Questioning-Based Student Worksheets on Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Objective: The ability to think critically plays an essential role in students' achievement in the 21st century, yet its development in science classroom instruction continues to be insufficient. Science education can be monotonous, the content is often perceived as complex, and students typically lack confidence during discussions. This study investigates the influence of Socratic Questioning-based Student Worksheets (SQ-SW) on the improvement of critical thinking skills among junior high school students regarding excretory system content. The novelty of this study lies in the deliberate integration of Socratic questioning techniques into student workbooks, a topic that has been scarcely explored in previous research. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental framework with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Participants involved 64 eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 27 Banjarmasin, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. The experimental group used the SQ-SW, while the control group used conventional worksheets. Data were collected through a validated response questionnaire and a critical thinking skills assessment, both of which have been confirmed as valid and reliable. Data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach, normality and homogeneity tests, paired-sample t-tests, and independent-sample t-tests. Findings: The findings indicated that SQ-SW could be efficiently applied with a commendable rating. Students in the experimental group demonstrated notable progress in critical thinking, achieving a moderate N-gain (0.56), whereas the control group achieved only a minimal N-gain (0.11). Four critical thinking dimensions (question formulation, hypothesis creation, self-regulation, and conclusion formation) showed moderate advancement. However, the analytical dimension displayed more constrained growth. Conclusion: The use of SQ-SW significantly influences junior secondary students' mastery of excretory system content and their development of critical thinking. Integrating Socratic questions throughout student worksheets creates a systematic, motivating pedagogical approach that breaks conventional classroom routines while enhancing conceptual depth. This investigation introduces a fresh educational technique adaptable to diverse science subjects and academic stages.  

 

Keywords: critical thinking skill, excretory system, science learning, socratic questioning. 


Alharbi, S. M., Elfeky, A. I., & Ahmed, E. S. (2022). The effect of e-collaborative learning environment on the development of critical thinking and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6, 6849. http://journalppw.com

Arianti, S., & Kusairi, S. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran structured inquiry berbantuan socratic questioning : materi optika geometri [Students’ critical thinking skills in structured inquiry learning assisted by Socratic questioning: geometric optics material]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 30–37. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/article/view/15907

Aribah, L., Sabarudin, & Rofik. (2025). Analisis persepsi mahasiswa terhadap efektivitas strategi pembelajaran socratic questioning dalam meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis [Analysis of students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the Socratic questioning learning strategy in improving . Dimar; Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.58577/dimar.v6i2.339

Ayunda, N., Lufri, & Alberida, H. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) berbantuan LKPD terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik [The influence of the problem based learning (PBL) learning model assisted by LKPD on students’ critical thinking skills]. Journal on Education, 5(2), 5003–5004. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.1232

Bangun, A. V., & Pragholapati, A. (2021). Enhancing critical thinking skills in nursing higher education in preparation for the industrial revolution 4.0. KnE Life Sciences, 2021(1), 794. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v6i1.8756

Blyznyuk, T., & Kachak, T. (2024). Benefits of interactive Learning for students' critical thinking skills improvement. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 94–95. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.94-102

Descartin, D. M. D., Kilag, O. K. T., Groenewald, S. E., Abella, J. L., Cordova Jr, N. A., & Jumalon, M. L. S. (2023). Curricular insights: Exploring the impact of philippine k to 12 on PISA 2022 reading literacy achievement. Excellencia International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(6), 335. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0939-2899

Favero, L., Pérez-Ortiz, J. A., Käser, T., & Oliver, N. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking in education by means of a socratic chatbot. 17(32), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93409-4_2

Fiirdaus, R. J., Wahyuni, S., & Utomo, A. P. (2021). Analisis penggunaan video pembelajaran ipa kontekstual terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP [Analysis of the use of contextual science learning videos on the critical thinking skills of junior high school students]. Physics and Science Education Journal (PSEJ), 1(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.30631/psej.v1i2.702

Ghaleb, B. D. S. (2024). Effect of exam-focused and teacher-centered education systems on students’ cognitive and psychological competencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2(02), 612. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i02.648

Ho, Y. R., Chen, B. Y., & Li, C. M. (2023). Thinking more wisely: using the socratic method to develop critical thinking skills amongst healthcare students. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04134-2

Hu, Z. (2023). Promoting critical thinking through socratic questions in health sciences work-integrated learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 139. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.8

Kooloos, J. G. M., Bergman, E. M., Scheffers, M. A. G. P., Schepens-Franke, A. N., & Vorstenbosch, M. A. T. M. (2020). The effect of passive and active education methods applied in repetition activities on the retention of anatomical knowledge. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(4), 458–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1924

Li, S., Tang, S., Geng, X., & Liu, Q. (2022). Constructing a critical thinking evaluation framework for college students majoring in the humanities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(November), 02. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017885

Lintangsari, A. P., Emaliana, I., & Kusumawardani, I. N. (2022). Improving learners’ critical thinking and learning engagement through socratic questioning in nominal group technique. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.22352

Norillah, Idris, R. G., Hidayah, N., & Niazi, J. A. (2022). Socratic questioning: a philosophical approach in developing critical thinking skills. Al Hikmah International Journal, 5(4), 146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46722/hikmah.y5i4g

O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(August), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110

Ragab, A., Kaid, A., & Sayed, A. K. (2024). Enhancing higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in education: strategies and outcomes. The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 1489. https://journal.tofedu.or.id/index.php/journal/index

Ristanto, R. H., Rahayu, S., & Mutmainah, S. (2021). Conceptual understanding of excretory system: implementing cooperative integrated reading and composition based on scientific approach. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 30–31. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.2.8.1

Rubini, B., Septian, B., & Permana, I. (2019). Enhancing critical thinking through the science learning on using interactive problem based module. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022001

Siagian, B. E., Aziz, T. A., & Hakim, L. El. (2023). Implementasi metode Socrates di era pendidikan modern [Implementation of the Socratic method in the modern education era]. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(1), 188–191. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v3i1.289

Susanto, T. T. D., Solihin, R. R., Fauziyah, E. P., Yanti, N. V. I., & Ramadhania, A. P. (2024). Upaya pemerintah Indonesia dalam meningkatkan kualitas guru ditinjau dari hasil PISA 2022: sebuah kajian pustaka [The Indonesian government’s efforts to improve teacher quality as reviewed from the results of PISA 2022: a literature review]. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 38(1), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.381.6

Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Salam, A. (2020). Creative responsibility based learning. Lambung Mangkurat University Press.

Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.