Mapping Newman’s Error Analysis to Mathematical Creative Thinking: A Diagnostic Tool for Identifying Cognitive Disruptions
), Vici Suciawati(2)
| 
Country:
(1) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia
(2) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
This study examines the relationship between Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) stages and dimensions of Mathematical Creative Thinking (MCT) in solving contextual problems on relations and functions. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, 25 eighth-grade students were analyzed through two open-ended contextual essay items and semi-structured interviews. Errors identified at each NEA stage (reading, comprehension, transformation, process skills, encoding) were mapped to corresponding MCT dimensions to investigate correlations between error patterns and limitations in creative thinking. Findings indicate that students’ primary difficulties emerged at higher-order cognitive stages. Most students succeeded in the reading (23 students on item 1) and comprehension stages (19 students), yet substantial errors occurred during transformation (14 errors), process skills (17 errors), and encoding (20 errors), a pattern similarly observed in Item 2. The narrowing of the Sankey diagram flow suggests that the core difficulties lie not in basic literacy skills but rather in increasing representational and procedural complexity, particularly at the transition from transformation to process skills. Case analyses revealed distinct profiles: high-ability students demonstrated strong fluency and flexibility but experienced a “cognitive transparency illusion” that constrained their elaboration; medium-ability students showed inconsistency in strategic execution due to strategic breakdowns and affective instability; and low-ability students encountered cascading failures beginning from the earliest stages. The study positions the NEA–MCT mapping as an interpretive diagnostic helpful framework for identifying cognitive–affective barriers to mathematical creativity. This framework supports differentiated interventions, including metacommunicative scaffolding for high-ability students, integrated cognitive–strategic–affective support for medium-ability students, and foundational representational instruction with affective scaffolding for low-ability students. Limitations include the small sample size and the narrow task context. Future studies should involve larger and more diverse participants, incorporate real-time think-aloud data, explore additional mathematical domains, and evaluate the framework’s potential in digital learning environments.
Keywords: mathematical creative thinking, Newman’s Error Analysis, problem solving, relations and functions.
Arifianti, D., & Baidawi, M. (2024). Improving students ’ creative thinking skills in mathematics through solving open-ended problems. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ibrahimy, 2(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.35316/jummy.v2i1.5551
Asikin, M., Prastiyo, D., & Suhito. (2019). Students ’ mathematical creative thinking ability in creative problem solving learning based on self-esteem. UJME, 8(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v8i1.25263
Bicer, A. (2021). A systematic literature review : discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(2), 252–281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1254
Bicer, A., Aldemir, T., Krall, G., Quiroz, F., Chamberlin, S., Nelson, J. L., Lee, Y., & Kwon, H. (2024). Exploring creativity in mathematics assessment: An analysis of standardized tests. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101652
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buelban, L. B., & Tan, R. (2024). Exploring the pernicious errors in algebra problem-solving among freshmen based-mathematics students of Northern Bukidnon State College. Sci-Int, 36(6), 603–613.
DeVink, I. C., Willemsen, R. H., Lazonder, A. W., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2022). Creativity in mathematics performance : the role of divergent and convergent thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12459
Elgrably, H., & Leikin, R. (2021). Creativity as a function of problem ‑ solving expertise : posing new problems through investigations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01228-3
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
Hartati, N., Jaenudin, A., & Yusuf, Y. (2025). Profile of mathematical creative thinking ability of high school students reviewed from cognitive style. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 09(01), 997–1009.
Hoth, J., Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Identifying and dealing with student errors in the mathematics classroom : cognitive and motivational requirements. Front. Psychol, 13, 1057730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1057730
Ibrahim, Khalil, I. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2024). Mathematics learning orientation : mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition ? Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 253–276. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp253-276
Kania, N., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurlaelah, E., & Kyaruzi, F. (2024). Decoding student struggles in geometry: Newman error analysis of higher- order thinking skills. Journal of Geometry Research and Inventions in Education, 01(01), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.56855/gradient.v1i01.1146
Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast Volume, 16(1), 505–540. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1471
Kurniati, U., Setiyani, & Sagita, L. (2021). Error analysis using Newman procedures and the mathematical representation ability of pre service english teachers. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.6211a
Leikin, R. (2013). Evaluating mathematical creativity : the interplay between multiplicity and. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(4), 385–400.
Leikin, R., & Elgrably, H. (2020). Problem posing through investigations for the development and evaluation of proof-related skills and creativity skills of prospective high school mathematics teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.002
Lu, X., Kaiser, G., Zhu, Y., Ma, H., & Yan, Y. (2025). Mathematical creativity in modelling : further development of the construct, its measurement, and its empirical implementation and flexible thinking necessary for identifying and solving. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01678-z
Lubis, R. S., Pramudya, I., & Subanti, S. (2021). Mathematics literacy : Newman’s error analysis (NEA) review from habits of mind. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 597, 237–245.
Mathaba, P. N., Tîrnovan, D., & Bossé, M. J. (2024). Error analysis in algebra learning : exploring misconceptions and cognitive levels. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 575–592. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp575-592
Newman, A. (1977). Error analysis in mathematics education: reading, comprehension, transformation, process skills and encoding. University of Canberra.
Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, G. T. C., Nguyen, B. N., Truong, D. T., & Thai, L. T. H. (2025). Mathematical communication skills for high school students : a comprehensive review of present practices, challenges, and prospective advancements. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2349–2360. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM143
Nufus, H., Muhandaz, R., Hasanuddin, Nurdin, E., Ariawan, R., Fineldi, R. J., Hayati, I. R., David, D., & Situmorang, B. (2024). Analyzing the students ’ mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of self-regulated learning : how do we find what we are looking for ? Heliyon, 10(3), e24871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871
Säfström, A. I., Lithner, J., Palm, T., Palmberg, B., Sidenvall, J., Andersson, C., Boström, E., & Granberg, C. (2024). Developing a diagnostic framework for primary and secondary students ’ reasoning difficulties during mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115, 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10278-1
Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. J. (2020). Students creative process in mathematics : insights from eye-tracking-stimulated recall interview on students work on multiple solution tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1565–1586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10033-0
Schoevers, E. M., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Kattou, M. (2018). Mathematical creativity : a combination of domain- general creative and domain-specific mathematical skills. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.361
Singer, F. M. (2018). Enhancing creative capacities in mathematically-promising students: challenges and limits. In Mathematical Creativity and Mathematical Giftedness (In F.M. Si, pp. 1–23). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_1
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking : a systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Thomas, D. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Analysis of students’ error in solving quadratic equations using Newman’s procedure. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11760
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking: norms-technical manual. NJ: Personal Press.
Turan, M., Sengil-Akar, S., & Saygı, E. (2025). Fostering mathematical creativity: a case study of middle school teachers’ classroom practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 101848. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101848
Wahyuni, R., Juniati, D., & Wijayanti, P. (2024). How do math anxiety and self-confidence affect mathematical problem solving? TEM Journal, 13(1), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131
Zhang, L., Song, N., Wu, G., & Cai, J. (2025). Understanding the cognitive processes of mathematical problem posing: evidence from eye movements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118(3), 449–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10262-9
No supplementary information available.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.