Developing a POE2WE-Based Interactive Mobile Application to Support Physics Learning
Innovation in learning is an essential requirement, particularly in addressing the challenges of 21st-century education, which demand more effective, interactive, and student-centered learning processes. Fundamentally, innovation activities require strategies and skills to enhance students’ learning effectiveness across the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. One approach to achieving this is to implement an appropriate learning model that aligns with the characteristics of the subject matter and learners’ needs. In this context, the POE2WE learning model (Prediction, Observation, Explanation, Elaboration, Write, and Evaluation) is a relevant alternative, as it promotes active student engagement and supports the development of scientific and reflective thinking skills. This study employed the McKenney development model, which consists of three main stages: Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation. In the design stage, a needs analysis was conducted, followed by the development of a learning structure and the preparation of instructional content integrated with the POE2WE syntax. The development stage focused on creating an Android-based physics learning application equipped with interactive features, learning materials, and evaluation components, aligned with the POE2WE model. Subsequently, the formative evaluation stage was conducted to assess the product's feasibility and practicality through expert validation and limited user trials. The research sample consisted of 124 respondents, including Physics Education students from Siliwangi University and Midwifery students from the Tasikmalaya Health Polytechnic. Data were analyzed using validity and practicality tests to determine the quality of the developed product. The results indicated that the application achieved a very high level of validity, with a POE2WE learning model validity score of 0.92 and a media validity score of 0.88. Furthermore, the practicality test yielded a score of 88.3%, which falls into the “very practical” category. Therefore, the developed Android-based physics learning application is considered highly valid and practical for use as an innovative learning medium to support the physics learning process.
Keywords: android application, POE2WE, and learning media.
Abazi-Bexheti, L., Kadriu, A., Apostolova-Trpkovska, M., Jajaga, E., & Abazi-Alili, H. (2018). LMS solution: Evidence of google classroom usage in higher education. Business Systems Research, 9(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0003
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). The advantages and challenges of augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
•Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2021). Application of learning management system (LMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A sustainable acceptance model of the expansion technology approach. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910991
Ardiansyah, M., & Brorsen, K. R. (2020). Mixed quantum–classical dynamics with machine learning-based potentials via Wigner sampling. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 124(44), 9326–9331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c08253
Arena, F., Collotta, M., Pau, G., & Termine, F. (2022). An overview of augmented reality. Computers, 11(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020028
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (edisi revisi). Bumi Aksara.
Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the Android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a
Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: Establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09872-2
Bradley, V. M. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
Bretos, M. A., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., & Orús, C. (2024). Applying virtual reality and augmented reality to the tourism experience: A comparative literature review. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 28(3), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2023-0052
BSNP. (2014). Instrumen penilaian buku teks pelajaran tahun 2014. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Dhote, S., Vichoray, C., Mankar, V., & Dhote, R. (2024). STEM-based AR physics assisted resources in smart learning system. 2nd International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS 2024). IEEE.
Euler, E., Gregorcic, B., & Linder, C. (2020). Variation theory as a lens for interpreting and guiding physics students’ use of digital learning environments. European Journal of Physics, 41(4), Article 045701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab895c
Eveline, E., Suparno, S., & Ardiyati, T. K. (2019). Development of interactive physics mobile learning media for enhancing students' HOTS. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05206
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., Drummy, M., & Gardner, M. (2020). Education reimagined: The future of learning. New Pedagogies for Deep Learning.
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Hermansyah, H., & Herayanti, L. (2018). Development of virtual laboratory based on Android for physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), Article 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012015
Halim, A., Syafrizal, S., Susanna, S., & Elizar, E. (2021). Physics education in the Industrial Revolution 4.0: Integration of internet of things (IoT) in physics laboratory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), Article 012130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012130
Hanafi, H. F., & Samsudin, K. (2012). Mobile learning environment system (MLES): The case of Android-based learning application on undergraduates. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(3), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2012.030311
Henukh, A., Astra, I. M., Setyaningsih, S., & Sulisworo, D. (2021). The use of Google Classroom as ICT literacy to improve physics students collaboration skill in industrial revolution 4.0. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331(1), Article 030002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041656
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 1–9.
Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J.-B. (Eds.). (2010). Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021). Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2
Karimah, U., Sunarti, T., & Munasir, M. (2023). Digital era for quality education: Effectiveness of discovery learning with Android to increase scientific literacy. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(6), 674–686. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.437
Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), Article 14406. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), Article 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
Kurniati, P., Kelmaskouw, A. L., Deing, A., Bonin, B., & Haryanto, B. A. (2022). Model proses inovasi Kurikulum Merdeka implikasinya bagi siswa dan guru abad 21 [The Independent Curriculum innovation process model and its implications for 21st century students and teachers]. Jurnal Citizenship Virtues, 2(2), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v2i2.1516
Larasati, A. (2022). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya mutu pendidikan di Indonesia [Analysis of the factors causing the low quality of education in Indonesia]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 12(2), 145–156.
Lestari, S., Setyarsih, W., & Qosyim, A. (2019). The role of physics learning in Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), Article 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012018
Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Nesbit, J. C., Belfer, K., & Leacock, T. L. (2007). Learning object review instrument (LORI) version 1.5. Simon Fraser University.
Panggabean, D. D., Naibaho, G. D. M., & Simangunsong, I. T. (2023). Improving students’ concept with POE2WE learning model assisted by PhET Android simulation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 2351–2357. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.2892
Ramadani, E. M., & Nana, N. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis aplikasi Android menggunakan Power Point Ispring Suite 9 dengan model POE2WE pada materi teori kinetik gas [Development of Android application-based learning media using Power Point Ispring Suite 9 with the POE2WE model on the kinetic theory of gases material]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online (JPFT), 8(3), 85–91.
Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-Google Classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
Ramandani, A. (2021). Literatur review penerapan augmented reality pada pendidikan. ResearchGate.
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (Panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Rusdiana, A., Sulhan, M., Arifin, I. Z., & Kamludin, U. A. (2020). Penerapan model POE2WE berbasis blended learning Google Classroom pada pembelajaran masa WFH pandemic Covid-19. Pusat Penelitian dan Penerbitan UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Sain, N., Ahmad, J., & Halim, A. (2024). Educational transformation in the 21st century: Shifting towards dynamic and technology-integrated approaches. International Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 23–35.
Scarsella, R., & Stofega, W. (2018). Worldwide smartphone forecast, 2018–2022. International Data Corporation (IDC).
Scheel, L., Vladova, G., & Ullrich, A. (2022). The influence of digital competences, self-organization, and independent learning abilities on students’ acceptance of digital learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00350-w
Setyawan, B., & Fatirul, A. N. (2019). Pemanfaatan teknologi e-learning dalam pembelajaran konsep abstrak bagi mahasiswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(2), 112–124.
Siswanto, J., Tri Jaka Harjanta, A., Kurnia Prahani, B., & Suminar, I. (2022). The validity and practicality of the integrated learning model: Physics, digital, and local wisdom. KnE Social Sciences, 7(19), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12489
Sitepu, T. E. (2022). Pengaruh digitalisasi pendidikan terhadap nilai kearifan lokal Indonesia di sekolah dasar. Seminar Nasional 2022-NBM Art. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
Sugiyanto, S., Sukardiyono, S., & Aznam, N. (2020). The implementation of POE2WE model to improve students' critical thinking skills in physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), Article 022031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022031
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). Effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Syahrial, S., Asrial, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Chan, F. (2021). Integrating TPACK framework into physics learning media innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 650–658. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21049
Tinoca, L., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., & Henriques, S. (2022). Iterative product refinement through systematic evaluation cycles in educational technology design-based research. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100412
Walker, D. F., & Hess, R. D. (1984). Instructional software: Principles and perspectives for design and use. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Werdiningsih, W. (2021). Manajemen sumber daya manusia dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru melaksanakan pembelajaran daring [Human resource management in improving teacher competency in implementing online learning]. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19109/sajiem.v2i1.7371
Wibowo, F. C., Hasbey, H., Aziz, T. A., Darman, D. R., Kusuma, A. F. A. K., Ihsan, & Bunyami, M. A. H. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence chatbot climate change with physics digital modules for student learning assistants. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(12), Article 2025583. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025583
Wirjawan, J. V. D., Pratama, D., Batlolona, J. R., Netrida, N., Wijaya, A., & Loupatty, M. (2020). Android-based physics learning-media apps for high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1428(1), Article 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1428/1/012024
Yasin, M., Jauhariyah, M. N. R., & Shodiqin, M. A. (2022). Interactive learning media innovation in physics to enhance students' problem-solving skills in the digital era. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), Article em2084. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11696
Yul, F. A. (2023). Perancangan aplikasi media pembelajaran berbasis Android mata kuliah sistem operasi [Design of Android-based learning media applications for operating systems courses]. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 8(1), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v8i1.3906
Yunita, Y., & Nana, N. (2020). Penggunaan model pembelajaran POE2WE dengan bantuan aplikasi Zenius Education untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dalam pembelajaran fisika [The use of the POE2WE learning model with the help of the Zenius Education application to improve conceptual understanding in physics learning]. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/ecxyw
Zou, Y., Kuek, F., Feng, W., & Cheng, X. (2025). Digital learning in the 21st century: Trends, challenges, and innovations in technology integration. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1358354.
Zulkarnain, Z., Zulhafizh, Z., & Atika, N. (2020). Digital transformation in physics education: Challenges and opportunities in the Industry 4.0 era. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.901
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.