How Immersive Digital Technology Learning in Ecology and Environmental Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Country:
(1) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia
(2) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia
(3) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia
This study investigates research trends in immersive digital technologies in ecological and environmental education. It also examines how immersive learning environments impact student learning outcomes and engagement across various educational contexts. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA protocol and the SPIDER framework. Publications were searched for between 2015 and 2025. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively. An initial search of the Scopus database identified 253 publications, and the ERIC database identified 43 publications, of which 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for in-depth analysis. The results indicate that research interest in immersive digital technologies in ecological and environmental education began in 2019. Most research on immersive digital technologies was conducted in 2025. VOSviewer analysis revealed that the identified keywords were technology, learning, and environmental substance. Among the identified technologies, virtual reality (VR) was the most dominant keyword. Furthermore, the study found that research on virtual reality technologies outnumbered research on augmented reality. Immersive digital technologies are used to enhance learning outcomes across affective, cognitive, behavioral, and engagement domains. This technology helps improve students' affective skills, such as environmental awareness, ecological empathy, positive attitudes toward conservation, and connectedness to nature. Game-based and narrative-based learning contribute to increased affective engagement and learning motivation. In the learning process, immersive digital technology is facilitated by contextual learning designs, such as experiential, inquiry-based, and situated learning. This review shows that immersive digital technologies in ecology and environmental education depend on the learning approach and objectives, enabling these technologies to support learning outcomes such as cognitive, affective, behavioral, and engagement. In addition, learning outcomes are influenced by immersive modality and learning approach.
Keywords: augmented reality, virtual reality, virtual field trips, ecology education, environmental education.
Adjanin, N., & Brooks, G. P. (2023). Witnessing the last tropical glaciers: student use of virtual reality technology to learn about climate change and protecting endangered environments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 22(4), 248–257. https://tojet.net/articles/v22i4/22424.pdf
Aguayo, C., Eames, C., & Cochrane, T. (2020). A framework for mixed reality free-choice, self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2347
Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2016). Digital gaming for evolutionary biology learning: The case study of parasite race, an augmented reality location-based game. Lumat, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.4.1.3
Alene, G. H., Vicari, H., Irshad, S., Perkis, A., Bruland, O., & Thakur, V. (2023). Realistic visualization of debris flow type landslides through virtual reality. Landslides, 20(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01948-x
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241(April 2019), 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
Asino, T. I., Colston, N. M., Ibukun, A., & Abai, C. (2022). The Virtual Citizen Science Expo Hall: A Case Study of a Design-Based Project for Sustainability Education. Sustainability, 14(8), 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084671
Badilla-Quintana, M. G., & Sandoval-Henríquez, F. J. (2021). Students’ immersive experience in initial teacher training in a virtual world to promote sustainable education: interactivity, presence, and flow. Sustainability, 13(22), 12780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212780
Blair, C., Walsh, C., & Best, P. (2021). Immersive 360° videos in health and social care education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 590. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03013-y
Bleier, M. (2023). Beyond neat classifications: A case for the in-betweens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10184-1
Bogerd, N. van den, Hovinga, D., Hiemstra, J. A., & Maas, J. (2023). The potential of green schoolyards for healthy child development: a conceptual framework. Forests, 14(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040660
Brick, C., Nielsen, K. S., & Hofmann, W. (2023). Opportunities for emotion research on biodiversity. Emotion Review, 15(4), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739231193755
Buchanan, J., Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Maher, D. (2019). Promoting environmental education for primary school-aged students using digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100639
Cárdenas-Valdivia, J., Flores-Alvines, J., Iparraguirre-Villanueva, O., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2023). Augmented reality for quechua language teaching-learning: a systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(06), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i06.37793
Carmi, N., & Alkaher, I. (2019). Risk literacy and environmental education: does exposure to academic environmental education make a difference in how students perceive ecological risks and evaluate their risk severity? Sustainability, 11(22), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226350
Cavanaugh, G., Condry, H. M., Afable, C. F., Morris, M., De, S., Madison, H. E., Marshall, J., Victor, C. P., & Weiner, M. (2023). Immersive learning and participatory engagement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.317364
Chandler, T., Richards, A. E., Jenny, B., Dickson, F., Huang, J., Klippel, A., Neylan, M., Wang, F., & Prober, S. M. (2022). Immersive landscapes: modelling ecosystem reference conditions in virtual reality. Landscape Ecology, 37(5), 1293–1309. shttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01313-8
Chiang, T. H. C. (2021). Investigating effects of interactive virtual reality games and gender on immersion, empathy and behavior into environmental education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608407
Cho, Y., & Park, K. S. (2023). Designing immersive virtual reality simulation for environmental science education. Electronics, 12(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020315
Chuang, T. Y., Tsai, S. K., & Lu, Y. H. (2025). Technology-enhanced digital game-based learning for environmental literacy: catalyzing attitude change in learners. Frontiers in Education, 10(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1629670
Dewanto, R., Pujianto, P., Wiyatmo, Y., & Daffa Ghifari Yani, A. (2024). Education Exploring The Role of Augmented Reality in Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Across Education Levels. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1635-1647
Dunn, M. E., Shah, G., & Veríssimo, D. (2021). Stepping into the Wildeverse: Evaluating the impact of augmented reality mobile gaming on pro-conservation behaviours. People and Nature, 3(6), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10273
Duwan, E., Choi, F., & Helmuth, B. (2019). Assessing The Use of Virtual Reality Technology in Teaching Marine Ecological Concepts. The Journal of STEM Outreach, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.14
Essokolo, V.-L. B., & Robinot, E. (2022). Let’s go deep into the game to save our planet! how an immersive and educational video game reduces psychological distance. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105774
Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A., & vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience? - On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804
Harrington, M. C. R. (2023). Virtual nature makes knowledge beautiful. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4(March), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1100540
Huang, X., Huss, J., North, L., Williams, K., & Boyd-Devine, A. (2023). Cognitive and motivational benefits of a theory-based immersive virtual reality design in science learning. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100124
Indayati, T., Rahayu, W., & Karinsa, H. (2024). Alternate reality game and augmented reality: do they complement in promoting students’ self-efficacy for science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1329-1346
Ison, M., & Bramwell-Lalor, S. (2023). The arts in environmental education: connecting learners with their talents and nature. Environmental Education Research, 29(7), 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2205062
Jia, F., & Wang, W. (2024). City-level sustainable development impacts on environmental literacy: feelings toward nature, environmental knowledge, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315573
Juergensmeier, N. H. genannt, Schmidt, R., & Stumpe, B. (2024). Virtual Field Trip: A study to analyse the raising awareness of biodiversity loss through biodiversity analyses in Virtual Reality. European Journal of Geography, 15(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.48088/EJG.N.HEU.15.3.214.231
Klippel, A., Zhao, J., Jackson, K. Lou, La Femina, P., Stubbs, C., Wetzel, R., Blair, J., Wallgrün, J. O., & Oprean, D. (2019). Transforming earth science education through immersive experiences: delivering on a long held promise. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1745–1771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854025
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090
Lampropoulos, G., Barkoukis, V., Burden, K., & Anastasiadis, T. (2021). 360-degree video in education: An overview and a comparative social media data analysis of the last decade. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00165-8
Lestari, A., & Rohmani, R. (2024). Trends of augmented reality in science education studies in elementary schools: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 – 2023. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(2), 814–826. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp814-826
Lo, J.-H., Lai, Y.-F., & Hsu, T.-L. (2021). The Study of AR-Based Learning for Natural Science Inquiry Activities in Taiwan’s Elementary School from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(11), 6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116283
Lo, S. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2022). Design of 3D virtual reality in the metaverse for environmental conservation education based on cognitive theory. Sensors, 22(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218329
Lovren, V. O., & Jablanovic, M. M. (2023). Bridging the gap: the affective dimension of learning outcomes in environmental primary and secondary education. Sustainability, 15(8), 6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086370
Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186
Mäkelä, M., & Aktaş, B. M. (2023). Learning with the natural environment: how walking with nature can actively shape creativity and contribute to holistic learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12447
Mallam, S. C., Nazir, S., & Renganayagalu, S. K. (2019). Rethinking maritime education, training, and operations in the digital era: applications for emerging immersive technologies. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(12), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7120428
Marinelli, M., Male, S. A., Valentine, A., Guzzomi, A., van der Veen, T., & Hassan, G. M. (2023). Using VR to teach safety in design: what and how do engineering students learn? European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2172382
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381
Masmuzidin, M. Z., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Suhaimi, S. (2022). A systematic review of the design of augmented reality applications for young children. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(17), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i17.31837
Masruroh, H., Sahrina, A., Khalidy, D. Al, & Trihatmoko, E. (2024). Generating mobile virtual tour using uav and 360 degree panorama for geography-environmental learning in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i02.45961
Mei, B., & Yang, S. (2019). Nurturing environmental education at the tertiary education level in China: Can mobile augmented reality and gamification help? Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164292
Mercier, J., Ertz, O., & Bocher, E. (2025). “Look at the trees”: A verbal nudge to reduce screen time when learning biodiversity with augmented reality. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18(February), 100614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100614
Mercier, J., Leon Perez, L., Audrin, C., Bocher, E., Ertz, O., & Sander, E. (2025). The impact of augmented reality on biodiversity learning: An experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 20(April), 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100801
Meronda, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Yahmin, Y. (2025). Virtual laboratories in science education: a systematic review of effectiveness on conceptual understanding and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(3), 2020–2042. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp2020-2042
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
Mohsen, M. A., & Alangari, T. S. (2024). Analyzing two decades of immersive technology research in education: Trends, clusters, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3571–3587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11968-2
Mulders, M., & Träg, K. H. (2023). Presence and flow as moderators in xr-based sustainability education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316496
Mulders, M., Träg, K. H., & Kirner, L. (2025). Go green: evaluating an XR application on biodiversity in German secondary school classrooms. Instructional Science, 53(3), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09697-1
Olsen, E. K., Lawson, D. F., McClain, L. R., & Plummer, J. D. (2024). Heads, hearts, and hands: a systematic review of empirical studies about eco/climate anxiety and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 30(12), 2131–2158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315572
Oriti, D., Manuri, F., Pace, F. De, & Sanna, A. (2023). Harmonize: a shared environment for extended immersive entertainment. Virtual Reality, 27(4), 3259–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00585-4
Ou, K. L., Chu, S. T., & Tarng, W. (2021). Development of a virtual wetland ecological system using VR 360◦ panoramic technology for environmental education. Land, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080829
Ou, K. L., Liu, Y. H., & Tarng, W. (2021). Development of a virtual ecological environment for learning the Taipei tree frog. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115911
Pande, P., & Jepsen, P. M. (2024). Science lab safety goes immersive: An ecological media-comparison study with gender analyses assessing iVR’s learning effectiveness. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, 001. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20001
Park, J., Jang, S., & Bolter, J. D. (2025). Me, the elephant, and the virtual world: exploring copresence in VR. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(6), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1145/3748632
Pasca, L. (2022). Pride and guilt as mediators in the relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental intention. Climatic Change, 175(1–2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03458-0
Petersson-Bloom, L., Leifler, E., & Holmqvist, M. (2023). The use of professional development to enhance education of students with autism: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090966
Riva, F., Graco-Roza, C., Daskalova, G. N., Hudgins, E. J., Lewthwaite, J. M. M., Newman, E. A., Ryo, M., & Mammola, S. (2023). Toward a cohesive understanding of ecological complexity. Science Advances, 9(25). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4207
Roy, T., Sparra, H. J., Skripnikov, A., & Gilchrist, S. (2025). Fostering environmental responsibility with JellyBean: a Google Cardboard VR-based case study on cultivating awareness in middle and high school students about marine ecology and the impact of everyday pollutants. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6(March), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1469409
Safitri, D., Marini, A., Irwansyah, P., & Sudrajat, A. (2025). Transforming environmental education with augmented reality: A model for learning outcome. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12(July), 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101796
Samala, A. D., Usmeldi, Taali, Ambiyar, Bojic, L., Indarta, Y., Tsoy, D., Denden, M., Tas, N., & Dewi, I. P. (2023). Metaverse technologies in education: a systematic literature review using PRISMA. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(05), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.35501
Sandbrook, C., Tait, E., & Adams, W. M. (2025). “Race the Wild”: Encountering non-human life through the gamification of wildlife movement. Conservation and Society, 23(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_122_22
Schneider, I. E., Weber, M. M., Khadka, A., & Bahlmann, B. (2025). Influencing aquatic invasive species prevention behaviors: an exploration and experiment with augmented reality. Environmental Management, 3449–3460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02283-2
Sedlák, M., Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Chmelík, J., & Doležal, M. (2022). Collaborative and individual learning of geography in immersive virtual reality: An effectiveness study. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0276267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276267
Selvakumar, S., & Sivakumar, P. (2025). Immersive learning technology for teacher education: a systematic literature review. Journal of Learning for Development, 12(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v12i1.1500
Stone, W., Loizzo, J., Aenlle, J., & Beattie, P. (2022). Labs and landscapes virtual reality: student-created forest conservation tours for informal public engagement. Journal of Applied Communications, 106(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2395
Su, Y.-S., Cheng, H.-W., & Lai, C.-F. (2022). Study of virtual reality immersive technology enhanced mathematics geometry learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760418
Sviridova, E., Yastrebova, E., Bakirova, G., & Rebrina, F. (2023). Immersive technologies as an innovative tool to increase academic success and motivation in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1192760
Turan, Z., & Karabey, S. C. (2023). The use of immersive technologies in distance education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16041–16064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11849-8
Vercelloni, J., Peppinck, J., Santos-Fernandez, E., McBain, M., Heron, G., Dodgen, T., Peterson, E. E., & Mengersen, K. (2021). Connecting virtual reality and ecology: a new tool to run seamless immersive experiments in R. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e544. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.544
Walkington, C., Nathan, M. J., Huang, W., Hunnicutt, J., & Washington, J. (2024). Multimodal analysis of interaction data from embodied education technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2565–2584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10254-9
Wang, M., Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (2020). Preface to the special issue on Cross Reality (XR) and Immersive Learning Environments (ILE) in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696845
Yang, Y., Hu, J., Jing, F., & Nguyen, B. (2018). From awe to ecological behavior: the mediating role of connectedness to nature. Sustainability, 10(7), 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072477
Zain, F. M., Sailin, S. N., Kasim, M., Abdul Karim, A. M., & Zameri, N. N. (2022). Developing an augmented reality immersive learning design (ailead) framework: a fuzzy delphi approach. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(11), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i11.30063
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


