How Immersive Digital Technology Learning in Ecology and Environmental Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Dian Samitra(1,Mail), Zico Fakhrur Rozi(2), Reny Dwi Riastuti(3) | CountryCountry:


(1) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia
(2) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia
(3) Department of Biology Education, Universitas PGRI Silampari, Indonesia

MailCorresponding Author

Metrics Analysis (Dimensions & PlumX)

Indexing:
Similarity:

© 2026 Dian Samitra, Zico Fakhrur Rozi, Reny Dwi Riastuti

This study investigates research trends in immersive digital technologies in ecological and environmental education. It also examines how immersive learning environments impact student learning outcomes and engagement across various educational contexts. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA protocol and the SPIDER framework. Publications were searched for between 2015 and 2025. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively. An initial search of the Scopus database identified 253 publications, and the ERIC database identified 43 publications, of which 26 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for in-depth analysis. The results indicate that research interest in immersive digital technologies in ecological and environmental education began in 2019. Most research on immersive digital technologies was conducted in 2025. VOSviewer analysis revealed that the identified keywords were technology, learning, and environmental substance. Among the identified technologies, virtual reality (VR) was the most dominant keyword. Furthermore, the study found that research on virtual reality technologies outnumbered research on augmented reality. Immersive digital technologies are used to enhance learning outcomes across affective, cognitive, behavioral, and engagement domains. This technology helps improve students' affective skills, such as environmental awareness, ecological empathy, positive attitudes toward conservation, and connectedness to nature. Game-based and narrative-based learning contribute to increased affective engagement and learning motivation. In the learning process, immersive digital technology is facilitated by contextual learning designs, such as experiential, inquiry-based, and situated learning. This review shows that immersive digital technologies in ecology and environmental education depend on the learning approach and objectives, enabling these technologies to support learning outcomes such as cognitive, affective, behavioral, and engagement. In addition, learning outcomes are influenced by immersive modality and learning approach.

 

Keywords: augmented reality, virtual reality, virtual field trips, ecology education, environmental education.

Adjanin, N., & Brooks, G. P. (2023). Witnessing the last tropical glaciers: student use of virtual reality technology to learn about climate change and protecting endangered environments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 22(4), 248–257. https://tojet.net/articles/v22i4/22424.pdf

Aguayo, C., Eames, C., & Cochrane, T. (2020). A framework for mixed reality free-choice, self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28(1063519), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2347

Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2016). Digital gaming for evolutionary biology learning: The case study of parasite race, an augmented reality location-based game. Lumat, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.4.1.3

Alene, G. H., Vicari, H., Irshad, S., Perkis, A., Bruland, O., & Thakur, V. (2023). Realistic visualization of debris flow type landslides through virtual reality. Landslides, 20(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01948-x

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241(April 2019), 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Asino, T. I., Colston, N. M., Ibukun, A., & Abai, C. (2022). The Virtual Citizen Science Expo Hall: A Case Study of a Design-Based Project for Sustainability Education. Sustainability, 14(8), 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084671

Badilla-Quintana, M. G., & Sandoval-Henríquez, F. J. (2021). Students’ immersive experience in initial teacher training in a virtual world to promote sustainable education: interactivity, presence, and flow. Sustainability, 13(22), 12780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212780

Blair, C., Walsh, C., & Best, P. (2021). Immersive 360° videos in health and social care education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 590. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03013-y

Bleier, M. (2023). Beyond neat classifications: A case for the in-betweens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(2), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10184-1

Bogerd, N. van den, Hovinga, D., Hiemstra, J. A., & Maas, J. (2023). The potential of green schoolyards for healthy child development: a conceptual framework. Forests, 14(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040660

Brick, C., Nielsen, K. S., & Hofmann, W. (2023). Opportunities for emotion research on biodiversity. Emotion Review, 15(4), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739231193755

Buchanan, J., Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Maher, D. (2019). Promoting environmental education for primary school-aged students using digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100639

Cárdenas-Valdivia, J., Flores-Alvines, J., Iparraguirre-Villanueva, O., & Cabanillas-Carbonell, M. (2023). Augmented reality for quechua language teaching-learning: a systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(06), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i06.37793

Carmi, N., & Alkaher, I. (2019). Risk literacy and environmental education: does exposure to academic environmental education make a difference in how students perceive ecological risks and evaluate their risk severity? Sustainability, 11(22), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226350

Cavanaugh, G., Condry, H. M., Afable, C. F., Morris, M., De, S., Madison, H. E., Marshall, J., Victor, C. P., & Weiner, M. (2023). Immersive learning and participatory engagement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.317364

Chandler, T., Richards, A. E., Jenny, B., Dickson, F., Huang, J., Klippel, A., Neylan, M., Wang, F., & Prober, S. M. (2022). Immersive landscapes: modelling ecosystem reference conditions in virtual reality. Landscape Ecology, 37(5), 1293–1309. shttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01313-8

Chiang, T. H. C. (2021). Investigating effects of interactive virtual reality games and gender on immersion, empathy and behavior into environmental education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608407

Cho, Y., & Park, K. S. (2023). Designing immersive virtual reality simulation for environmental science education. Electronics, 12(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020315

Chuang, T. Y., Tsai, S. K., & Lu, Y. H. (2025). Technology-enhanced digital game-based learning for environmental literacy: catalyzing attitude change in learners. Frontiers in Education, 10(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1629670

Dewanto, R., Pujianto, P., Wiyatmo, Y., & Daffa Ghifari Yani, A. (2024). Education Exploring The Role of Augmented Reality in Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes Across Education Levels. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1635-1647

Dunn, M. E., Shah, G., & Veríssimo, D. (2021). Stepping into the Wildeverse: Evaluating the impact of augmented reality mobile gaming on pro-conservation behaviours. People and Nature, 3(6), 1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10273

Duwan, E., Choi, F., & Helmuth, B. (2019). Assessing The Use of Virtual Reality Technology in Teaching Marine Ecological Concepts. The Journal of STEM Outreach, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.14

Essokolo, V.-L. B., & Robinot, E. (2022). Let’s go deep into the game to save our planet! how an immersive and educational video game reduces psychological distance. Sustainability, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105774

Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A., & vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience? - On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100804

Harrington, M. C. R. (2023). Virtual nature makes knowledge beautiful. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4(March), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1100540

Huang, X., Huss, J., North, L., Williams, K., & Boyd-Devine, A. (2023). Cognitive and motivational benefits of a theory-based immersive virtual reality design in science learning. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100124

Indayati, T., Rahayu, W., & Karinsa, H. (2024). Alternate reality game and augmented reality: do they complement in promoting students’ self-efficacy for science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(3), 1329–1346. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i3.pp1329-1346

Ison, M., & Bramwell-Lalor, S. (2023). The arts in environmental education: connecting learners with their talents and nature. Environmental Education Research, 29(7), 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2205062

Jia, F., & Wang, W. (2024). City-level sustainable development impacts on environmental literacy: feelings toward nature, environmental knowledge, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315573

Juergensmeier, N. H. genannt, Schmidt, R., & Stumpe, B. (2024). Virtual Field Trip: A study to analyse the raising awareness of biodiversity loss through biodiversity analyses in Virtual Reality. European Journal of Geography, 15(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.48088/EJG.N.HEU.15.3.214.231

Klippel, A., Zhao, J., Jackson, K. Lou, La Femina, P., Stubbs, C., Wetzel, R., Blair, J., Wallgrün, J. O., & Oprean, D. (2019). Transforming earth science education through immersive experiences: delivering on a long held promise. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1745–1771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854025

Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090

Lampropoulos, G., Barkoukis, V., Burden, K., & Anastasiadis, T. (2021). 360-degree video in education: An overview and a comparative social media data analysis of the last decade. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00165-8

Lestari, A., & Rohmani, R. (2024). Trends of augmented reality in science education studies in elementary schools: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 – 2023. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(2), 814–826. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp814-826

Lo, J.-H., Lai, Y.-F., & Hsu, T.-L. (2021). The Study of AR-Based Learning for Natural Science Inquiry Activities in Taiwan’s Elementary School from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(11), 6283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116283

Lo, S. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2022). Design of 3D virtual reality in the metaverse for environmental conservation education based on cognitive theory. Sensors, 22(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218329

Lovren, V. O., & Jablanovic, M. M. (2023). Bridging the gap: the affective dimension of learning outcomes in environmental primary and secondary education. Sustainability, 15(8), 6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086370

Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186

Mäkelä, M., & Aktaş, B. M. (2023). Learning with the natural environment: how walking with nature can actively shape creativity and contribute to holistic learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12447

Mallam, S. C., Nazir, S., & Renganayagalu, S. K. (2019). Rethinking maritime education, training, and operations in the digital era: applications for emerging immersive technologies. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(12), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7120428

Marinelli, M., Male, S. A., Valentine, A., Guzzomi, A., van der Veen, T., & Hassan, G. M. (2023). Using VR to teach safety in design: what and how do engineering students learn? European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2172382

Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381

Masmuzidin, M. Z., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Suhaimi, S. (2022). A systematic review of the design of augmented reality applications for young children. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(17), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i17.31837

Masruroh, H., Sahrina, A., Khalidy, D. Al, & Trihatmoko, E. (2024). Generating mobile virtual tour using uav and 360 degree panorama for geography-environmental learning in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i02.45961

Mei, B., & Yang, S. (2019). Nurturing environmental education at the tertiary education level in China: Can mobile augmented reality and gamification help? Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164292

Mercier, J., Ertz, O., & Bocher, E. (2025). “Look at the trees”: A verbal nudge to reduce screen time when learning biodiversity with augmented reality. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18(February), 100614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100614

Mercier, J., Leon Perez, L., Audrin, C., Bocher, E., Ertz, O., & Sander, E. (2025). The impact of augmented reality on biodiversity learning: An experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 20(April), 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100801

Meronda, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Yahmin, Y. (2025). Virtual laboratories in science education: a systematic review of effectiveness on conceptual understanding and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(3), 2020–2042. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i3.pp2020-2042

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Mohsen, M. A., & Alangari, T. S. (2024). Analyzing two decades of immersive technology research in education: Trends, clusters, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3571–3587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11968-2

Mulders, M., & Träg, K. H. (2023). Presence and flow as moderators in xr-based sustainability education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316496

Mulders, M., Träg, K. H., & Kirner, L. (2025). Go green: evaluating an XR application on biodiversity in German secondary school classrooms. Instructional Science, 53(3), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09697-1

Olsen, E. K., Lawson, D. F., McClain, L. R., & Plummer, J. D. (2024). Heads, hearts, and hands: a systematic review of empirical studies about eco/climate anxiety and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 30(12), 2131–2158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2315572

Oriti, D., Manuri, F., Pace, F. De, & Sanna, A. (2023). Harmonize: a shared environment for extended immersive entertainment. Virtual Reality, 27(4), 3259–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00585-4

Ou, K. L., Chu, S. T., & Tarng, W. (2021). Development of a virtual wetland ecological system using VR 360◦ panoramic technology for environmental education. Land, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080829

Ou, K. L., Liu, Y. H., & Tarng, W. (2021). Development of a virtual ecological environment for learning the Taipei tree frog. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115911

Pande, P., & Jepsen, P. M. (2024). Science lab safety goes immersive: An ecological media-comparison study with gender analyses assessing iVR’s learning effectiveness. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, 001. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20001

Park, J., Jang, S., & Bolter, J. D. (2025). Me, the elephant, and the virtual world: exploring copresence in VR. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(6), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1145/3748632

Pasca, L. (2022). Pride and guilt as mediators in the relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental intention. Climatic Change, 175(1–2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03458-0

Petersson-Bloom, L., Leifler, E., & Holmqvist, M. (2023). The use of professional development to enhance education of students with autism: a systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(9), 966. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090966

Riva, F., Graco-Roza, C., Daskalova, G. N., Hudgins, E. J., Lewthwaite, J. M. M., Newman, E. A., Ryo, M., & Mammola, S. (2023). Toward a cohesive understanding of ecological complexity. Science Advances, 9(25). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4207

Roy, T., Sparra, H. J., Skripnikov, A., & Gilchrist, S. (2025). Fostering environmental responsibility with JellyBean: a Google Cardboard VR-based case study on cultivating awareness in middle and high school students about marine ecology and the impact of everyday pollutants. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6(March), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1469409

Safitri, D., Marini, A., Irwansyah, P., & Sudrajat, A. (2025). Transforming environmental education with augmented reality: A model for learning outcome. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12(July), 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101796

Samala, A. D., Usmeldi, Taali, Ambiyar, Bojic, L., Indarta, Y., Tsoy, D., Denden, M., Tas, N., & Dewi, I. P. (2023). Metaverse technologies in education: a systematic literature review using PRISMA. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(05), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.35501

Sandbrook, C., Tait, E., & Adams, W. M. (2025). “Race the Wild”: Encountering non-human life through the gamification of wildlife movement. Conservation and Society, 23(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_122_22

Schneider, I. E., Weber, M. M., Khadka, A., & Bahlmann, B. (2025). Influencing aquatic invasive species prevention behaviors: an exploration and experiment with augmented reality. Environmental Management, 3449–3460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02283-2

Sedlák, M., Šašinka, Č., Stachoň, Z., Chmelík, J., & Doležal, M. (2022). Collaborative and individual learning of geography in immersive virtual reality: An effectiveness study. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0276267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276267

Selvakumar, S., & Sivakumar, P. (2025). Immersive learning technology for teacher education: a systematic literature review. Journal of Learning for Development, 12(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v12i1.1500

Stone, W., Loizzo, J., Aenlle, J., & Beattie, P. (2022). Labs and landscapes virtual reality: student-created forest conservation tours for informal public engagement. Journal of Applied Communications, 106(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2395

Su, Y.-S., Cheng, H.-W., & Lai, C.-F. (2022). Study of virtual reality immersive technology enhanced mathematics geometry learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760418

Sviridova, E., Yastrebova, E., Bakirova, G., & Rebrina, F. (2023). Immersive technologies as an innovative tool to increase academic success and motivation in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1192760

Turan, Z., & Karabey, S. C. (2023). The use of immersive technologies in distance education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16041–16064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11849-8

Vercelloni, J., Peppinck, J., Santos-Fernandez, E., McBain, M., Heron, G., Dodgen, T., Peterson, E. E., & Mengersen, K. (2021). Connecting virtual reality and ecology: a new tool to run seamless immersive experiments in R. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e544. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.544

Walkington, C., Nathan, M. J., Huang, W., Hunnicutt, J., & Washington, J. (2024). Multimodal analysis of interaction data from embodied education technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2565–2584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10254-9

Wang, M., Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (2020). Preface to the special issue on Cross Reality (XR) and Immersive Learning Environments (ILE) in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696845

Yang, Y., Hu, J., Jing, F., & Nguyen, B. (2018). From awe to ecological behavior: the mediating role of connectedness to nature. Sustainability, 10(7), 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072477

Zain, F. M., Sailin, S. N., Kasim, M., Abdul Karim, A. M., & Zameri, N. N. (2022). Developing an augmented reality immersive learning design (ailead) framework: a fuzzy delphi approach. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(11), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i11.30063

extraction data and articles

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.