Development of a Prophetic-Based Physics Classroom Management Model Using the ADDIE Approach to Promote Holistic Student Learning
This study aims to develop a prophecy-based physics classroom management model through the ADDIE approach to support student learning holistically. This study used a Research and Development (R&D) method consisting of five stages: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The analysis stage revealed that physics learning management is still dominated by cognitive aspects and has not been optimally integrated with prophetic values. Therefore, a classroom management model was developed that integrates the values of shiddiq (honesty), amanah (responsibility), tabligh (communicative and collaborative attitude), and faṭonah (wisdom and critical thinking) into physics learning. The model was validated by three experts in the fields of physics education, educational management, and Islamic education. The validation results showed a feasibility level of 91.5%, which is categorized as very feasible. Implementation was carried out with physics education students for 14 learning sessions. The findings indicate improvements in prophecy-based classroom planning, collaborative implementation, spiritual reflection, holistic evaluation, and student participation, with an average N-Gain score of 0.61 in the moderate category and an effect size of 1.03 in the large category. Qualitatively, this learning model creates a more participatory, reflective, collaborative, and meaningful learning environment. The integration of prophetic values into classroom management also contributes to strengthening students' scientific character, spiritual awareness, and active engagement in learning. The novelty of this research lies in the development of a prophecy-based physics classroom management model that systematically integrates the values of shiddiq, amanah, tabligh, and faṭonah in the ADDIE cycle and examines its quantitative and qualitative impacts on physics learning. The developed model shows potential for wider application in other science learning to realize education that is not only oriented toward academic achievement, but also toward character building and sustainably strengthening students' prophetic values.
Keywords: classroom management, physics learning, prophetic values, ADDIE, holistic learning.
Aliyyah, R. R., Djuanda, U. (2018). Management of lower grade at amaliah elementary school ciawi. 81–95. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/z26fq
Afrialdi, R. M., Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A. (2026). Reconstruction of teachers' strategies in cultivating honest character through physics learning: a systematic synthesis based on values, affective, and cognitive. Integrated Science Education Journal, 7(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v7i2.2313
Anu Laine, Maija Ahtee , Liisa Näveri. (2020). Impact of teacher’s actions on emotional atmosphere in mathematics lessons in primary school, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09948-x
American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2009). VALUE rubrics (valid assessment of learning in undergraduate education).
https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics
Arends, R I. (2012). Learning to teach, ninth edition. new york: mcgraw-hill.
Branch, R. M. (2020). Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. springer.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, M., McGrath, R. E., Bier, M. C., Johnson, K., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2023). A comprehensive meta-analysis of character education programs. Journal of Moral Education, 52(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2060196
Chan, F., Kurniawan, A. R., N., Herawati, N., Efendi, R. N., & Mulyani, J. S. (2019). Teachers’ strategies in classroom management in elementary schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i4.21749
Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108
Darwin et al. (2025). A systematic approach in curriculum administration and management to achieve holistic learning. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 5(1). https://e-journal.stakanakbangsa.ac.id/index.php/ijce/article/view/234
Dou, R., Brewe, E., Potvin, G., Zwolak, J. P., & Hazari, Z. (2018). Understanding the development of interest and self-efficacy in active-learning undergraduate physics courses. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1488088
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson Education
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Ermawati, I. R., Sugianto, S., & Hartini, T. I. (2023). Development of a statistical physics module based on the learning cycle integrated with prophetic values. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro, 12(2), 123–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v11i2.8785
Fraser, B. J. (2015). Classroom learning environments. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education. 154–157. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hartini, T. I., Martin, Ermawati, I.R. (2022). The effectiveness of virtual laboratories in prophetic-integrated electronics practicum learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika dan Riset Ilmiah, 6(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v6i2.1623
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2006). Basic Management: Concepts and Problems. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hussin, W. N. T. W. (2018). Integrating spiritual values in science education: A holistic approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1149a
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2020). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 1–20.
Jack Holbrook & Miia Rannikmae. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy, International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Khan, S., & Alam, M. (2017). Outcome-based quality assessment framework for higher education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.06063
Kim, C., Hannafin, M. J. (2021). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1–25.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2021). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler.
Kuntowijoyo. (2006). Islam as Science: Epistemology, Methodology, and Ethics. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Koutrouba, K., Markarian, D. A., & Sardianou, E. (2018). Classroom management style: Greek teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11440a
Lickona, T. (2021). Character education revisited. Journal of Moral Education, 50(1),1–15.
Lili Rahmawati, Romizah, & Zulhadi. (2024). The important role of curriculum administration in education. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (PJPI), 1(2), 263–268. https://ejournal.lapad.id/index.php/pjpi
Maelasari, N., Sunendar, D., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2019). Mind mapping learning model based on prophetic values to improve exposition writing skills of Grade X students at SMAN 1 Baleendah Bandung. In Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/1024
Majid, N. (2025). The epistemology of prophetic education as the foundation of Islamic education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 1–16.
Mestre, J. P. (2001). Implications of research on learning for the education of prospective science teachers. Physics Education, 36(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/36/1/307
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Miller, J. P. (2005). Holistic Learning and Spirituality in Education: Breaking New Ground. New York: State University of New York Press.
Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461
Mulyadi. (2018). Diagnosis of learning difficulties in schools. Jurnal Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(1), 18–23.https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/alawlad/article/view/1596
Nasir, M., Rijal, M. K., Primarni, A., Lima, L., & Prastawa, S. (2024). Philosophical foundations of holistic education in the 21st century. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 471-482.
Novak, J. D. (2021). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change. Science Education, 105(2), 1–15.
Plomp, T., Nieveen, N. (2020). Educational design research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Rahmawati, Y. (2023). Value-based science learning and student engagement. Journal of Science Education Research.
Reeves, T. C., Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1–10.
Ramma, Y., Bholoa, A., Watts, M., & Nadal, P. S. (2018). Teaching and learning physics using technology: making a case for the affective domain. Education Inquiry, 9(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1343606
Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
Robbins, S. P. (2016). Organizational behavior. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sanusi Herman. (2019). Implementation of holistic learning in improving students’ interest and motivation. In Proceedings of the National Seminar, 1, 3–34. https://www.ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/351
Schraw, G., Moshman, D. (2022). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1–20.
Siroj, M., Untung, S. (2024). Islamic education management in shaping students’ character. Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, 6(4), 152–165. https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/jpm/article/view/3234/3714
Sriyanta, K., Mujahid. (2025). Holistic education in developing student character. TsaQofah: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Indonesia, 5(2), 1639–1646. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i2.4899
Sugiyono. (2019). Educational research methods: quantitative, qualitative, and r&d approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syukri Fathudin, Ahmad Widodo, Touheed Ahmed. (2024). Implementation and impact of environment-based holistic education on students: A case study in nature schools. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 24(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v24i2.76954
Vahlia, I., Sholiha, S., Afwan, B. (2022). Implementation of prophetic value-based learning in entrepreneurship courses to build students’ character. Jurnal Lentera Pendidikan Pusat Penelitian LPPM UM Metro, 7(1), 1–9. https://ojs.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/lentera/article/view/2089
Wallace, C. S., Prather, E. E., Milsom, J. A., Johns, K., & Manne, S. (2021). Students taught by a first-time instructor using active learning teaching strategies outperform students taught by a highly regarded traditional instructor. Journal of College Science Teaching, 50(4), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.09684
Widiastuti, A., Nurhasanah, N. (2021). Development of character-based teaching materials to improve students’ scientific thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v11i2.39482
Zohar, A., Barzilai, S. (2023). Higher-order thinking in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 1–25.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.