Analysis of Junior High School Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills in Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Learning Based on Gender
), Suwito Singgih(2), Nuryunita Dewantari(3), Suryandari Suryandari(4) (1) Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Tidar, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Alma Ata, Indonesia
Corresponding AuthorCopyright (c) 2025 Zaky Zakaria, Suwito Singgih, Nuryunita Dewantari, Suryandari Suryandari
| Article Metrics→ |
| Indexing Database→ |  |
 |
10.23960/jpmipa.v26i2.pp987-1006
Abstract
Scientific activities, such as communication, are essential skills in the 21st century. Scientific argumentation is a fundamental component of communication and serves as a foundation for students to engage in a series of scientific processes, leading to valid conclusions based on empirical data. This study aims to examine whether there are differences in the scientific argumentation abilities of male and female students following the implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning, as well as to analyze their respective argumentation patterns. This study employs an experimental research design with a pretest-posttest experimental group approach. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data collection involved pretest and posttest scores. The analysis of research results was tested using Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR), score conversion, normality test, Mann-Whitney test, and N-Gain test. The study population consisted of eighth-grade students at SMP IT Ihsanul Fikri Mungkid, from which two classes were selected through purposive sampling: VIII D (experimental class 1 - male students) and VIII H (experimental class 2 - female students). The findings indicate that the ADI model effectively enhances students’ scientific argumentation skills in both experimental groups. The N-Gain analysis revealed that in the argument completeness aspect, experimental class 1 (male students) achieved an N-Gain of 0.70 (moderate category), whereas experimental class 2 (female students) scored 0.93 (high category). In the scientific validity aspect, experimental class 1 obtained an N-Gain of 0.63 (moderate category), while experimental class 2 scored 0.84 (high category). Regarding overall scientific argumentation, experimental class 1 achieved an N-Gain of 0.67 (moderate category), whereas experimental class 2 reached 0.82 (high category). Further analysis of the argument completeness aspect identified a statistically significant difference between male and female students (p < 0.05); However, in the scientific validity aspect, no significant difference was observed between male and female students (p > 0.05); In the overall scientific argumentation aspect, a significant difference was found between male and female students (p < 0.05).
Keywords: gender, scientific argumentation, argument driven inquiry (ADI).
References
Afgani, T., Hasnunidah, N., & Surbakti, A. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry (ADI) dan gender terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa SMP pada materi pokok sistem pencernaan manusia. Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah, 8(1), 1-10.
Afifah, H., & Faizah, U. N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir ilmiah menggunakan soal berbasis masalah ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(2), 190-199.
Ali, S., & Khaeruddin. (2012). “Evaluasi pembelajaran.” i–101.
Amandus Hutasoit, S. (2021). “Pembelajaran teacher centered learning (tcl) dan project based learning (pbl) dalam pengembangan kinerja ilmiah dan peninjauan karakter siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 2(10):1775–99. doi: 10.59141/japendi.v2i10.294.
Andayani. 2008. “Review: gender dan performansi kognitif.” Gender Differences in Human Cognition 137–52.
Anita, A., & Tenriawaru, A. (2019). Pentingnya keterampilan argumentasi di era ledakan informasi digital. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura, August (pp. 1740-1746).
Aza Mazita, S., Singgih, S., Dewantari, N., & Bimo, D. S. (2024). Implementation of argument driven inquiry instructional model to improve cognitive learning outcomes.
Bashooir, K., & Supahar, S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran Fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal penelitian dan evaluasi pendidikan, 22(2), 219-230.
Bezci, F., & Sungur, S. (2021). How is middle school students' scientific reasoning ability associated with gender and learning environment?. Science Education International, 32(2), 96-106.
Bukifan, D., & Yuliati, L. (2021, March). Conceptual understanding of physics within argument-driven inquiry learning for STEM education: Case study. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
Cahyono, B. (2017). Analisis ketrampilan berfikir kritis dalam memecahkan masalah ditinjau perbedaan gender. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 50-64.
Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1-20.
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High‐school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445.
Dewi, A. C., Yahya, M., & Darmawang, D. (2022). Efektifitas model pembelajaran berbasis proyek pada mata kuliah perencanaan pembelajaran kejuruan. Jurnal Konsepsi, 11(2), 373-379.
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. (No Title).
Erdiana, N., Bahri, S., & Akhmal, C. N. (2019). Male vs. female EFL students: Who is better in speaking skill?. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 131-140.
Eti, N. (2014). Psikologi perempuan dalam berbagai perspektif.
Eymur, G. (2019). The influence of the explicit nature of science instruction embedded in the argument-driven inquiry method in chemistry laboratories on high school students’ conceptions about the nature of science. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 17-29.
Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., & Susilaningsih, E. (2021). Argument-driven inquiry learning model: a systematic review. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 767-784.
Grooms, J., Enderle, P., & Sampson, V. (2015). Coordinating scientific argumentation and the Next Generation Science Standards through argument driven inquiry. Science Educator, 24(1), 45-50.
Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi peserta didik. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1).
Ikhsan, M. H. (2023). Pendidikan karakter berbasis gender. INCARE, International Journal of Educational Resources, 4(4), 365-387.
Baharsyah, A. I., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa berbasis pola toulmins argument pattern (TAP) menggunakan model argument driven inquiry dan diskusi pada pembelajaran fisika SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 318-324.
Lenaini, I. (2021). Teknik pengambilan sampel purposive dan snowball sampling. Historis: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33-39.
Lestari, S. (2018). Peran teknologi dalam pendidikan di era globalisasi. EDURELIGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 94-100.
Mahanal, S. (2014, September). Peran guru dalam melahirkan generasi emas dengan keterampilan abad 21. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan HMPS Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Halu Oleo (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16).
Nurisyani, A. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran argument driven inquiry untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada materi usaha dan energi (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).
Muhajir, S. N., Oktaviani, V., Yuningsih, E. K., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2016, December). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan fisika dengan bantuan ICT. In Seminar Kontribusi Fisika 2016 (pp. 447-450).
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babaee, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. (2023). Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6302-6316.
Nuryadi, N., Astuti, D., Utami, S., & M Budiantara, M. B. (2017). Dasar-dasar statistik penelitian.
OECD. 2023. “PISA 2022 Results factsheets Indonesia.” The Language of Science Education 1:1–9.
Piraksa, C., Srisawasdi, N., & Koul, R. (2014). Effect of gender on student's scientific reasoning ability: A case study in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 486-491.
Rahayu, D. P., Wiyarsi, A., & Utami, A. (2022). Eksplorasi keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa melalui media sosial: topik kasus bioteknologi. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(3), 859-867.
Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. American journal of psychiatry, 170(1), 59-70.
Rousso, H. (2003). “Education for All: A gender and disability perspective.” Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2003/4, The Leap to Equality 1–35.
Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi argumentasi ilmiah dalam pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56-66.
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-driven inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology. The American biology teacher, 71(8), 465-472.
Sekaran, U. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Siregar, N., & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi ipa siswa melalui pembelajaran argument driven inquiry (ADI). LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94-103.
Siswanto, S., Hartono, H., Subali, B., & Masturi, M. (2022, September). Analisis keterampilan berargumentasi mahasiswa calon guru ipa dari aspek keilmiahan dan kelengkapan organ. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 988-992).
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1-22.
Sulistiana, S., Sriyono, S., & Nurhidayati, N. (2013). Pengaruh gender, gaya belajar, dan reinforcement guru terhadap prestasi belajar fisika siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri se-Kabupaten Purworejo Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 102-106.
Sulistyowati, Y. (2020). Kesetaraan gender dalam lingkup pendidikan dan tata sosial. Ijougs: Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 1-14.
Tamin, K. B., Ubadah, U., & Mashuri, S. (2022). Tantangan pendidikan dalam era abad 21. Prosiding Kajian Islam dan Integrasi Ilmu di Era Society (KIIIES) 5.0, 1(1), 338-342.
Toulmin, S. E., (2003). The uses of argument: updated edition.
Wuryanto, H., & Abduh, M. (2022). Mengkaji kembali hasil PISA sebagai pendekatan inovasi pembelajaran untuk peningkatan kompetensi literasi dan numerasi. Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar.
Zahara, I. K., Rosidin, U., Helina, K., & Hasnunidah, N. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model argument driven inquiry (ADI) pada pembelajaran IPA terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa SMP berdasarkan perbedaan kemampuan akademik. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 2(2), 53-61.
Zubaidah, S. (2016, December). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-17).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.