Mathematical Literacy Skills of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Capita Selecta Course: A Hermeneutic Phenomenology Approach
), Al Jupri(4)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp527-538
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2025 Reni Nuraeni, Jarnawi Afgani Dahlan, Rizky Rosjanuardi, Al Jupri
The mathematical literacy ability of students is still relatively low, and they have not been trained optimally. This study aims to analyze the level of mathematical literacy of prospective mathematics teacher students in the Selected Capita of Elementary Mathematics Education II course. The material includes the Pythagorean Theorem, Quadrilaterals and Triangles, Curved Side Spaces, and Comparison. The subjects of the study involved 25 students who were taking the Selected Capita of Elementary Mathematics Education II course. The research method used was qualitative with the Phenomenology Hermeneutic approach. The stages of the Phenomenology Hermeneutic approach are deciding on research questions, identifying pre-understanding, gaining understanding through dialogue with participants, gaining knowledge through dialogue with text, and building trust. Data were collected through descriptions of student answers and selected interviews. The data analysis technique follows the steps of Miles & Huberman. Question number 3 has a literacy indicator, namely interpreting solutions in problem-solving (interpret). The focus of the analysis is on students' answers to question number 3. Three students answered correctly, while one student answered with a few errors. While answers from 20 students contain significant errors, 1 student did not provide an answer. 3 students, who correctly answered question number 3, belong to moderate-ability students. Nevertheless, none of the students from the high-ability group were able to answer perfectly. This shows that students with moderate ability are better at answering question number 3 than students with high ability. Of the 20 student answers with the criteria of many errors, two answer patterns were found, errors in process skills and errors in writing the final answer. Efforts are needed to improve literacy skills through the presentation of literacy questions and learning that supports the development of students' mathematical literacy.
Keywords: capita selecta course, mathematical literacy skills, prospective mathematics teacher, hermeneutic phenomenology.
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Problem posing merupakan kemampuan matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 163-180.
Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by gadamer’s philosophy: a framework to facilitate data analysis. Sage Journals: International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820
Amelia, I., Novaliyosi., Santosa, C. A. H. F., dan Fatah, A. (2023). Systematic literature review: Kemampuan literasi matematis ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. TIRTAMATH: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika, 5(1), 31-43.
Clemen, M. N. (1980). The newman procedure for analysing errors on written mathematical tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
De Lange. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from oecd-pisa perspective. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics 25, 13-35.
Dosinaeng, W. B. N. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematika (mathematical literacy). Journal Prodi Metmatika Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Juli 2019.
Fatahillah, A., Wati, Y. F., & Susanto. (2017). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan tahapan newman beserta bentuk scaffolding yang diberikan. Kadikma, 8(1), 40-51.
Fatwa, V. C., Septian, A., & Inayah, S. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematis siswa melalui model pembelajaran problem based instruction. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 389-398.
Jeheman, A. A., Gunur, B., & Jelatu, S. (2019). Pengaruh pendekatan matematika realistik terhadap pemahaman konsep matematika siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 191-202.
Kemdikbud. (2020). Pusat asesmen dan pembelajaran badan penelitian dan pengembangan dan perbukuan kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan akm dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran.
Masfufah, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa melalui soal PISA. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 291-300.
Milles & Huberman. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Mulyadi, M., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2015). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada materi luas permukaan bangun ruang berdasarkan newman’s error analysis (nea) ditinjau dari kemampuan spasial. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(4), 370-382.
Murtiyasa, B., & Wulandari, V. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa materi bilangan pecahan berdasarkan teori newman. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i3.2795
Muzaki, A., & Masjudin. (2019). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 493-502.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM
Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils’ errors on written mathematical tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31- 43.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). Assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: are we able to put the mathematics we learm into everyday use. Journal Of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100.
Oktaviana, D. (2017). Analisis tipe kesalahan berdasarkan teori newman dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada mata kuliah matematika diskrit. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains&Matematika, (5)2, 22-32.
Oktiani, I. (2017). Kreativitas guru dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik. Jurnal kependidikan, 5(2), 216-232.
Prabawati, M. N. (2018). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematik mahasiswa calon guru matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 113-120.
Pranyata, Y. I. P. (2019). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa pendidikan matematika universitas kanjuruhan malang dalam menyelesaikan soal geometri. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 77-84.
Purnomo, B. W., & Sari, A. F. (2021). Literasi matematika siswa ips dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa konteks saintifik. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 357-368.
Rahman, S. (2021). Pentingnya motivasi belajar dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, ISBN 978-623-98648-2-8, hal 289-302.
Rohmah, M., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). Analysis problem solving in mathematical using theory newman. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80630
Sari, R. H. N. (2015). Literasi matematika: apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana?. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. UNY.
Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and scientific literacy: PISA for school mathematics. Springer.
Warmi, A. (2019). Pemahaman konsep matematis siswa kelas VIII pada materi lingkaran. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 297-30.
Widjaja, W. (2011). Towards mathematical literacy in the 21st century: perspectives from indonesia. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 75-84.
Zahrah, M. (2024). Penelitian literasi matematis di sekolah: pengertian dan kesulitan kesulitan siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jakarta, 6(1), 27-36.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.