Using E-Comics Based on Realistic Mathematics Education in Transformation Geometry
), Pukky Tetralian Bantining Ngastiti(2), Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Khasanah(3)
| 
Country:
(1) Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Billfath, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1769-1776
| Metrics→ |
| Indexing Site→ |  |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright (c) 2022 Lusi Rachmiazasi Masduki, Pukky Tetralian Bantining Ngastiti, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Khasanah
The very rapid development of technology in the era of Society 5.0, requires lecturers to package learning that is interesting for students, one of which is with media and learning approaches from abstract material to concrete material. The purpose of this research is to produce e-comic products with a realistic approach. mathematics education in geometry transformation courses that can be used in online tutorials for 4th semester mathematics education study program students at Universitas Terbuka. This research method uses the Dick & Carey development design by including eight steps. Based on the results of student questionnaire responses using e-comic media with a realistic mathematics education approach, namely based on the results of student assessment responses, an average value of 86% was obtained, which means that e-comic media is classified as good as a learning medium. Meanwhile, based on the test of the effectiveness of the use of media on students, it is obtained tcount 3.285 > ttable 2.002 from the two results from the t-test through comparison it can be concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that it means that there is a difference in the average learning outcomes between tutor class scores and the class media score. This means that the e-comic media learning outcomes with the RME approach to this transformation geometry material is effectively used for students of mathematics education program at the Universitas Terbuka.
Keywords: research & development, e-comics, realistic mathematics education.
Aggleton, J. (2019). Defining digital comics: A British Library perspective. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 10(4), 393–409.
Albab, I. U., Hartono, Y., & Darmawijoyo. (2014). Kemajuan belajar siswa pada geometri transformasi menggunakan aktivitas refleksi geometri [Student learning progress in transformational geometry using geometry reflection activities]. Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(3), 338–348.
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in m-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412.
Dimitris, K., & Nikolaos, K. (2014). Electronic textbooks: Advantages and challenges for the Hellenic higher education and publishing community. Library Review, 63(6), 531–543.
Ebied, M. A., & Rahman, S. A. A. (2015). The effect of interactive e-book on students' achievement at Najran University in computer in education course. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 71–82.
Edwards, L. D. (1997). "Explore Ring the terrority before proof": Students' generalization in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 187–215.
Enteria, O., & Casumpang, P. F. H. (2019). Effectiveness of developed comic strips as instructional materials in teaching specific science concepts. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(10), 876–882.
Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C. L., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(1), 91–103.
Hosler, J., & Boomer, K. (2011). Are comic books an effective way to engage nonmajors in learning and appreciating science? CBE Life Science Education, 10(3), 309–317.
Hollebrands, K. F. (2003). High school students’ understanding of geometric transformations in the context of a technological environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 55–72.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Shin, E. K. (2017). Students' expectation, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use digital textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 83–90.
Khalid, A. (2014). Textbooks: eBook vs. print. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 243–258.
Khayriah, M., Bshouty, D., & Verner, I. M. (2010). An ethnomathematics exercise in analyzing and constructing ornaments in a geometry class. Journal of Mathematics & Culture, 5(1), 1–20.
Khor, E. T. (2014). An analysis of ODL student perception and adoption behavior using the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 275–288.
Lazarinis, F., Mazaraki, A., Verykios, V. S., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2015). E-comics in teaching: Evaluating and using comic strip creator tools for educational purposes. In 2015 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 305–309).
Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern distance learning technologies in higher education: Introduction problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–8.
Martha, Z. D., Adi, E. P., & Soepriyanto, Y. (2018). E-book berbasis mobile learning [E-book based mobile learning]. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 109–114.
Mamolo, L. (2019). Analysis of senior high school students' competency in general mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1938–1944.
Morris, T., & Paulsen, R. (2011). Using tracing paper to teach transformation geometry. Johannensberg: Amesa.
Naidoo, J. (2010). Strategies used by grade 12 mathematics learners in transformation geometry. Natal: University of Kwazulu.
Özdemir, E. (2017). Humor in elementary science: Development and evaluation of comic strips about sound. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 837–850.
Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Rossa, B., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A. M. (2017). Print versus digital texts: Understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25(1), 1–12.
Schultz, K. A., & Austin, J. D. (1983). Directional effects in transformation tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 95–101.
Siregar, N., Suherman, Masykur, R., & Sari, R. N. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran e-comic dalam pembelajaran matematika [Development of e-comic learning media in mathematics learning]. Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 2(1), 11–19.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sri, G. (2019). Research and development (R&D) method as a model design in educational research and its alternatives. Holistics: Journal Hospitality and Linguistics, 11(2), 12–22.
Tafiardi. (2005). Meningkatkan mutu pendidikan melalui e-learning [Improving the quality of education through e-learning]. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, 4(4), 85–97.
Wu, B., & Zhang, C. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027–1038.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.